Study of Efficacy and Toxicity of Capecitabine Maintenance After Response to Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluracil-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Carcinoma Stomach.
Udip Maheshwari, Pankaj Goyal, Varun Goel, Nivedita Patnaik, Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala, Krushna Chaudhari, D C Doval, Vineet Talwar
{"title":"Study of Efficacy and Toxicity of Capecitabine Maintenance After Response to Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluracil-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Carcinoma Stomach.","authors":"Udip Maheshwari, Pankaj Goyal, Varun Goel, Nivedita Patnaik, Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala, Krushna Chaudhari, D C Doval, Vineet Talwar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced gastric cancer is associated with poor survival despite chemotherapy. Maintenance chemotherapy has been successfully tried in lung cancer and colorectal cancers however there is scarce literature on maintenance therapy in advanced gastric cancer. We report a prospective non-randomized single-arm trial of capecitabine maintenance after response to docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-Flurouracil-based chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 patients with advanced gastric cancer, who had achieved response or had stable disease after 6 cycles of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Flurouracil (D 75 mg/m2, C 75 mg/m2, FU 750 mg/m2/d d1-d5, q3 weeks) chemotherapy were prospectively selected to receive maintenance chemotherapy with capecitabine (1000mg/ m2 bid d1-d14 q21 days) until progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the median follow-up period of 18 months all patients had progressed, however, there was no treatment-related death, the median time to tumor progression was 10.3 months, with grade 3 and 4 toxicities in 10-15% of patients, and treatment delays in 75% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study has shown that maintenance chemotherapy with capecitabine post-first-line docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU-based chemotherapy is effective and delays tumor progression. However, toxicity was a concern in our study which led to treatment-related delays but without any treatment-related death. Most patients continued therapy till progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Advanced gastric cancer is associated with poor survival despite chemotherapy. Maintenance chemotherapy has been successfully tried in lung cancer and colorectal cancers however there is scarce literature on maintenance therapy in advanced gastric cancer. We report a prospective non-randomized single-arm trial of capecitabine maintenance after response to docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-Flurouracil-based chemotherapy.
Methods: 50 patients with advanced gastric cancer, who had achieved response or had stable disease after 6 cycles of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Flurouracil (D 75 mg/m2, C 75 mg/m2, FU 750 mg/m2/d d1-d5, q3 weeks) chemotherapy were prospectively selected to receive maintenance chemotherapy with capecitabine (1000mg/ m2 bid d1-d14 q21 days) until progression.
Results: During the median follow-up period of 18 months all patients had progressed, however, there was no treatment-related death, the median time to tumor progression was 10.3 months, with grade 3 and 4 toxicities in 10-15% of patients, and treatment delays in 75% of patients.
Conclusions: Our study has shown that maintenance chemotherapy with capecitabine post-first-line docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU-based chemotherapy is effective and delays tumor progression. However, toxicity was a concern in our study which led to treatment-related delays but without any treatment-related death. Most patients continued therapy till progression.