[New Methods of Evaluating Health Effects of Combined Exposures to Chemicals and Their Problems to Be Solved].

Q3 Medicine Japanese Journal of Hygiene Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1265/jjh.22009
Hideki Imai, Yuki Mizuno, Cindy Rahman Aisyah, Momoka Masuda, Shoko Konishi
{"title":"[New Methods of Evaluating Health Effects of Combined Exposures to Chemicals and Their Problems to Be Solved].","authors":"Hideki Imai,&nbsp;Yuki Mizuno,&nbsp;Cindy Rahman Aisyah,&nbsp;Momoka Masuda,&nbsp;Shoko Konishi","doi":"10.1265/jjh.22009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are several basic prerequisites for the risk assessment of combined exposures to pesticides and dioxins using human health effects as the endpoint. First, all the target chemical substances exert the same toxicity to humans through the same mechanisms. Second, there is a linear dose-response relationship between the toxicity and effects of individual chemicals. With these two prerequisites, the effects of combined exposures are estimated as the sum of the toxicities of individual chemicals. For example, the toxicities of dioxins are calculated using their toxic equivalent quantities (TEQ) by considering the assigned toxic equivalent factor (TEF) of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) set individually from their isomers and homologs. In conventional epidemiological studies, when the impact of each of multiple chemical substances is examined, methods such as multiple regression analysis or using a generalized linear model (GLM) have been used on the basis of the same prerequisites. However, in practice, some of the chemicals exhibit collinearity in their effects or do not show a linear dose-response relationship. In recent years, there have been several methods developed in the field of machine learning being applied to epidemiological research. Typical examples were methods using Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) and weighted quantile sum (WQS), and the shrinkage method, i.e., using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) and elastic network model (ENM). In the future, while taking into account the findings of experimental studies in biology, epidemiology, and other fields, it is expected that various methods will be applied and selected.</p>","PeriodicalId":35643,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.22009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several basic prerequisites for the risk assessment of combined exposures to pesticides and dioxins using human health effects as the endpoint. First, all the target chemical substances exert the same toxicity to humans through the same mechanisms. Second, there is a linear dose-response relationship between the toxicity and effects of individual chemicals. With these two prerequisites, the effects of combined exposures are estimated as the sum of the toxicities of individual chemicals. For example, the toxicities of dioxins are calculated using their toxic equivalent quantities (TEQ) by considering the assigned toxic equivalent factor (TEF) of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) set individually from their isomers and homologs. In conventional epidemiological studies, when the impact of each of multiple chemical substances is examined, methods such as multiple regression analysis or using a generalized linear model (GLM) have been used on the basis of the same prerequisites. However, in practice, some of the chemicals exhibit collinearity in their effects or do not show a linear dose-response relationship. In recent years, there have been several methods developed in the field of machine learning being applied to epidemiological research. Typical examples were methods using Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) and weighted quantile sum (WQS), and the shrinkage method, i.e., using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) and elastic network model (ENM). In the future, while taking into account the findings of experimental studies in biology, epidemiology, and other fields, it is expected that various methods will be applied and selected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[评价化学物质联合暴露对健康影响的新方法及其有待解决的问题]。
以人类健康影响为终点对农药和二恶英联合接触进行风险评估,有几个基本先决条件。首先,所有的目标化学物质通过相同的机制对人体产生相同的毒性。其次,个别化学品的毒性和作用之间存在线性剂量反应关系。有了这两个先决条件,综合接触的影响就可以估计为单个化学品毒性的总和。例如,二恶英的毒性是通过考虑2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并-对二恶英(2,3,7,8- tcdd)与其异构体和同源物分别设定的指定毒性当量因子(TEF),使用其毒性当量(TEQ)来计算的。在传统的流行病学研究中,当检查多种化学物质中的每一种的影响时,在相同的先决条件的基础上使用了多元回归分析或使用广义线性模型(GLM)等方法。然而,在实践中,有些化学物质在其作用中表现出共线性或不表现出线性剂量-反应关系。近年来,在机器学习领域已经开发了几种方法应用于流行病学研究。典型的例子是使用贝叶斯核机回归(BKMR)和加权分位数和(WQS)的方法,以及收缩方法,即使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(Lasso)和弹性网络模型(ENM)。未来,在考虑到生物学、流行病学等领域的实验研究结果的同时,预计将应用和选择各种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Hygiene
Japanese Journal of Hygiene Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
[Development of a Comprehensive Health Literacy Scale and Relationship between Health Literacy and Health-Related Behaviors among Japanese Workers]. [To the memory of the late Dr. Akira Okada]. [Awareness of issues in research and educational activities and expectations for young researchers' activities and supporting]. [Health Idea from Altruistic Perspective]. [Responses to "A Review of the Book 'Minamata Disease and the Responsibility of Medical Authorities'"].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1