What Frequency of Ankle Pump Exercise is Optimal to Improve Lower Limb Hemodynamics? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING Asian Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.001
Xin Wang , Rongsong Tang , Heli Zhang , Fan Li , Jing Wang , Baohua Li
{"title":"What Frequency of Ankle Pump Exercise is Optimal to Improve Lower Limb Hemodynamics? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis","authors":"Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Rongsong Tang ,&nbsp;Heli Zhang ,&nbsp;Fan Li ,&nbsp;Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Baohua Li","doi":"10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Ankle pump exercises (APE) have been widely used in clinical practice. However, best practices for APE have not been established. Recognize the most effective frequency of APE for improving lower extremity hemodynamics and establish recommendations in clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Therefore, a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed according to PRISMA-NMA. Six English databases (Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane library and ProQuest) and four Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and Sinomed) were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies investigating the effects of different frequencies of APE on lower limb hemodynamics published before July 2022 were included. The reference list was also searched. Seven studies (one RCTs and six quasi-experimental studies) were included in the systematic review and five studies (one RCTs and four quasi-experimental studies) were included in the NMA. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The NMA was performed using the R software (version 4.2.1) and OpenBUGS (version 3.2.3).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results of the NMA showed that a frequency of every 3–4 s the most effective in improving lower extremity hemodynamics (P =.85), followed by every 1–2 s (P = .81), every 5–6 s (P=.32) and less than every 10 s (P =.02). Subgroup analysis failed to find a difference between healthy participants and those with unilateral total hip arthroplasty or fracture (MD = −0.23, 95% CI-5.92 to 4.61).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Consequencely, for adult patients, with or without lower extremity disease, a frequency of every 3–4 s can be recommended as the optimal frequency of APE in clinical care practice.</p></div><div><h3>Registered number on PROSPERO</h3><p>CRD42022349365. <span>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=349365</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55450,"journal":{"name":"Asian Nursing Research","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131723000130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Ankle pump exercises (APE) have been widely used in clinical practice. However, best practices for APE have not been established. Recognize the most effective frequency of APE for improving lower extremity hemodynamics and establish recommendations in clinical practice.

Methods

Therefore, a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed according to PRISMA-NMA. Six English databases (Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane library and ProQuest) and four Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and Sinomed) were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies investigating the effects of different frequencies of APE on lower limb hemodynamics published before July 2022 were included. The reference list was also searched. Seven studies (one RCTs and six quasi-experimental studies) were included in the systematic review and five studies (one RCTs and four quasi-experimental studies) were included in the NMA. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The NMA was performed using the R software (version 4.2.1) and OpenBUGS (version 3.2.3).

Results

The results of the NMA showed that a frequency of every 3–4 s the most effective in improving lower extremity hemodynamics (P =.85), followed by every 1–2 s (P = .81), every 5–6 s (P=.32) and less than every 10 s (P =.02). Subgroup analysis failed to find a difference between healthy participants and those with unilateral total hip arthroplasty or fracture (MD = −0.23, 95% CI-5.92 to 4.61).

Conclusions

Consequencely, for adult patients, with or without lower extremity disease, a frequency of every 3–4 s can be recommended as the optimal frequency of APE in clinical care practice.

Registered number on PROSPERO

CRD42022349365. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=349365.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
踝关节泵运动的频率对改善下肢血流动力学是最佳的?系统回顾与网络元分析
目的踝关节泵运动(APE)在临床上得到了广泛的应用。然而,APE的最佳实践尚未确立。认识APE改善下肢血流动力学的最有效频率,并在临床实践中提出建议。方法根据PRISMA-NMA进行系统回顾和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。检索了6个英文数据库(Pubmed、Medline、CINAHL、Embase、Cochrane library和ProQuest)和4个中文数据库(CNKI、Wanfang、VIP和Sinomed)。包括2022年7月之前发表的随机对照试验(RCT)和准实验研究,研究不同频率的APE对下肢血流动力学的影响。还搜索了参考名单。系统综述中包括7项研究(1项随机对照试验和6项准实验研究),NMA中包括5项研究(一项随机对照研究和4项准实验性研究)。使用Cochrane和Joanna Briggs研究所的工具评估了偏倚的风险。使用R软件(4.2.1版)和OpenBUGS(3.2.3版)进行NMA。结果NMA的结果显示,每3-4秒的频率对改善下肢血流动力学最有效(P=.85),其次是每1-2秒(P=.81),每5-6秒(P=.32)和少于每10秒(P=.02)。亚组分析未能发现健康参与者与单侧全髋关节置换术或骨折参与者之间的差异(MD=-0.23,95%CI-5.92至4.61)。结论因此,对于患有或不患有下肢疾病的成年患者,在临床护理实践中,每3-4秒的频率可以被推荐为APE的最佳频率。PROSPEROCRD42022349365上的注册号。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=349365.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Asian Nursing Research is the official peer-reviewed research journal of the Korean Society of Nursing Science, and is devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will contribute to the body of nursing science and inform the practice of nursing, nursing education, administration, and history, on health issues relevant to nursing, and on the testing of research findings in practice.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of nurses' intention to stay: Examining the Impact of Healthcare Policy Involvement. Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form 34 for Patients with Cancer: A Methodological Study. Poor Nutritional Status Predicts Mortality in Patients with Acute Heart Failure Admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Mediating Role of Resilience between Dyadic Perceived Social Support and Depression at the Older Adults with Disabilities and their Family Caregivers in China: an Actor-partner Interdependence Model Extended to Mediation. Health Literacy in Fall Prevention Strategy: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1