Clinical and biochemical characteristics of diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes at a tertiary hospital in the United Arab Emirates.

Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare Pub Date : 2022-08-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcdhc.2022.918253
Raya Almazrouei, Amatur Rahman Siddiqua, Mouza Alnuaimi, Saif Al-Shamsi, Romona Govender
{"title":"Clinical and biochemical characteristics of diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes at a tertiary hospital in the United Arab Emirates.","authors":"Raya Almazrouei,&nbsp;Amatur Rahman Siddiqua,&nbsp;Mouza Alnuaimi,&nbsp;Saif Al-Shamsi,&nbsp;Romona Govender","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2022.918253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA) is a well-known acute complication of diabetes. This study aims to describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of adult patients with different diabetes types and DKA severities attending a tertiary hospital in the UAE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively extracted sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data from the electronic medical records of 220 adult patients with DKA admitted to Tawam Hospital between January 2017 and October 2020.<b>Results:</b> The average age was 30.6 ± 16.6 years of whom 54.5% were women, 77.7% were UAE nationals and 77.9% were Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). 12.7% were newly diagnosed with diabetes. Treatment noncompliance (31.4%), and infection (26.4%) were the main precipitating factors. Most patients presented with moderate DKA (50.9%). Compared to T1DM, patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were older (53.6 vs 23.9 years, p < 0.001), had longer hospital stay (12.1 days vs 4.1 days, p < 0.001), had more complications (52.1%, vs 18.9% p <0.001), and a higher mortality rate (6.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.035). Patients with severe DKA had a shorter diabetes duration compared to mild and moderate DKA (5.7 vs 11.0 vs 11.7 years, respectively, p = 0.007), while complications were significantly lower in the mild group compared to both the moderate and severe groups (11.6% vs 32.1% vs 33.3%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of DKA is higher for patients with T1DM than for those with T2DM. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with T2DM differ from those with T1DM highlighting the importance of educating all patients about DKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012054/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2022.918253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA) is a well-known acute complication of diabetes. This study aims to describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of adult patients with different diabetes types and DKA severities attending a tertiary hospital in the UAE.

Methods: We retrospectively extracted sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data from the electronic medical records of 220 adult patients with DKA admitted to Tawam Hospital between January 2017 and October 2020.Results: The average age was 30.6 ± 16.6 years of whom 54.5% were women, 77.7% were UAE nationals and 77.9% were Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). 12.7% were newly diagnosed with diabetes. Treatment noncompliance (31.4%), and infection (26.4%) were the main precipitating factors. Most patients presented with moderate DKA (50.9%). Compared to T1DM, patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were older (53.6 vs 23.9 years, p < 0.001), had longer hospital stay (12.1 days vs 4.1 days, p < 0.001), had more complications (52.1%, vs 18.9% p <0.001), and a higher mortality rate (6.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.035). Patients with severe DKA had a shorter diabetes duration compared to mild and moderate DKA (5.7 vs 11.0 vs 11.7 years, respectively, p = 0.007), while complications were significantly lower in the mild group compared to both the moderate and severe groups (11.6% vs 32.1% vs 33.3%, respectively).

Conclusion: The risk of DKA is higher for patients with T1DM than for those with T2DM. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with T2DM differ from those with T1DM highlighting the importance of educating all patients about DKA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉伯联合酋长国一家三级医院1型或2型糖尿病成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒的临床和生化特征。
背景:糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)是一种常见的糖尿病急性并发症。本研究旨在描述阿联酋一家三级医院就诊的不同糖尿病类型和DKA严重程度的成年患者的社会人口学、临床和生化特征,以及2017年1月至2020年10月期间入住塔瓦姆医院的220名DKA成年患者的电子医疗记录中的实验室数据。结果:平均年龄为30.6岁 ± 16.6 其中54.5%为女性,77.7%为阿联酋国民,77.9%为1型糖尿病(T1DM)。12.7%的患者新诊断为糖尿病。治疗依从性(31.4%)和感染(26.4%)是主要诱因。大多数患者表现为中度DKA(50.9%)。与T1DM相比,2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者年龄较大(53.6 vs 23.9 结论:T1DM患者患DKA的风险高于T2DM患者。T2DM患者的临床特征和结果与T1DM患者不同,这突出了对所有患者进行DKA教育的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy: a review of key concepts and an evidence-based surgical management algorithm. A systematic review of diabetic foot infections: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management strategies. The effects of diabetes self-management programs on clinical and patient reported outcomes in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Supporting healthy lifestyles for First Nations women and communities through co-design: lessons and early findings from remote Northern Australia. Metabolic syndrome and pharmacotherapy outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1