Peptic Ulcer Disease and its Treatments and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: a Meta-analysis.

Q3 Medicine The gulf journal of oncology Pub Date : 2023-05-01
Nasser Alkhushaym, Goot Albuainain, Tuqa A AbuShaheen, Mohammed Y Alshami, Ali S Almutairi, Ayman Ahmed Sakr, Ayat S Almuhayshi
{"title":"Peptic Ulcer Disease and its Treatments and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: a Meta-analysis.","authors":"Nasser Alkhushaym,&nbsp;Goot Albuainain,&nbsp;Tuqa A AbuShaheen,&nbsp;Mohammed Y Alshami,&nbsp;Ali S Almutairi,&nbsp;Ayman Ahmed Sakr,&nbsp;Ayat S Almuhayshi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the seventh leading cause of death among cancers mortality. Pancreatic carcinogenesis remains poorly understood. There is still an urge to allocate other related risk factors that may help in better recognition of this pathogenesis. There is increasing evidence suggested that peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and its treatment might affect the development of PC however, studies findings reported conflicting results. Our meta-analysis aimed to study the association between PUD and its treatments (proton pump inhibitors [PPIs] and histamine-2 receptor antagonists [H2RAs]) and risk of PC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library databases from inception through January 2022. We included case-control studies, cohort, and randomized control trials which reported the association between PUD, PPIs, and H2RAs and the risk of PC. Odds ratio (OR) were used to calculate pooled estimates for PC risk. The association were evaluated using random-effects models, in two sided statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 publications were retained for the meta-analysis. PUD was associated with a significant increase in PC risk (OR 1.26, 95% CI= 1.01-1.57, P= 0.038, I2= 92%). The risk of developing PC were significant in patients receiving PPIs (OR 1.76, 95% CI= 1.26-2.46, P=0.001, I2= 98%) and H2RAs (OR 1.25, 95% CI = 1.042- 1.49, P= 0.016, I2= 80%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a 1.26-fold increase risk of PC in patients with PUD. The elevated PC is also attributable to 1.76-fold greater risk in PPIs group compared to 1.25-fold in H2RAs group.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the seventh leading cause of death among cancers mortality. Pancreatic carcinogenesis remains poorly understood. There is still an urge to allocate other related risk factors that may help in better recognition of this pathogenesis. There is increasing evidence suggested that peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and its treatment might affect the development of PC however, studies findings reported conflicting results. Our meta-analysis aimed to study the association between PUD and its treatments (proton pump inhibitors [PPIs] and histamine-2 receptor antagonists [H2RAs]) and risk of PC.

Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library databases from inception through January 2022. We included case-control studies, cohort, and randomized control trials which reported the association between PUD, PPIs, and H2RAs and the risk of PC. Odds ratio (OR) were used to calculate pooled estimates for PC risk. The association were evaluated using random-effects models, in two sided statistical tests.

Results: A total of 22 publications were retained for the meta-analysis. PUD was associated with a significant increase in PC risk (OR 1.26, 95% CI= 1.01-1.57, P= 0.038, I2= 92%). The risk of developing PC were significant in patients receiving PPIs (OR 1.76, 95% CI= 1.26-2.46, P=0.001, I2= 98%) and H2RAs (OR 1.25, 95% CI = 1.042- 1.49, P= 0.016, I2= 80%).

Conclusions: There is a 1.26-fold increase risk of PC in patients with PUD. The elevated PC is also attributable to 1.76-fold greater risk in PPIs group compared to 1.25-fold in H2RAs group.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消化性溃疡疾病及其治疗与胰腺癌风险:一项荟萃分析
背景与目的:胰腺癌(PC)是癌症死亡的第七大原因。胰腺癌的发生机制仍然知之甚少。人们仍然迫切需要分配其他相关的危险因素,这可能有助于更好地认识这种发病机制。越来越多的证据表明,消化性溃疡疾病(PUD)及其治疗可能影响PC的发展,然而,研究结果报告了相互矛盾的结果。我们的荟萃分析旨在研究PUD及其治疗(质子泵抑制剂[PPIs]和组胺-2受体拮抗剂[H2RAs])与PC风险之间的关系。方法:检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索时间从成立到2022年1月。我们纳入了病例对照研究、队列研究和随机对照试验,这些研究报告了PUD、PPIs和H2RAs与PC风险之间的关系。比值比(OR)用于计算PC风险的汇总估计。在双侧统计检验中,使用随机效应模型评估这种关联。结果:共有22篇出版物被保留用于meta分析。PUD与PC风险显著增加相关(OR 1.26, 95% CI= 1.01-1.57, P= 0.038, I2= 92%)。接受PPIs的患者发生PC的风险显著(OR 1.76, 95% CI= 1.26-2.46, P=0.001, I2= 98%)和H2RAs (OR 1.25, 95% CI= 1.042- 1.49, P= 0.016, I2= 80%)。结论:PUD患者患PC的风险增加1.26倍。PPIs组PC升高的风险是H2RAs组的1.25倍,而PPIs组是1.76倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The gulf journal of oncology
The gulf journal of oncology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Assessing Mismatch Repair Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma -Insight from a Tertiary Care Centre. Assessment of Radiation Induced Pneumonitis and Pericarditis in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Treatment Using Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique. Comparison of Acute Toxicities, Overall Treatment Time and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy. Cost of Healthcare Services in Geriatric Neuro-oncology: A descriptive Analysis. Establishing and Monitoring an Effective Management of Benign Nontoxic Multinodular Goitre in Kuwait "Utilizing Two Different Dose Levels of Recombinant Human TSH in Combination with Radioactive Iodine".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1