Screening for thyroid disease in pregnancy: a study of Danish clinical practice.

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Thyroid Research Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.1186/s13044-023-00151-x
Line Cleman Hatting, Marie Østergaard Kristensen, Maja Hjelm Lundgaard, Anne Sørensen, Stine Linding Andersen
{"title":"Screening for thyroid disease in pregnancy: a study of Danish clinical practice.","authors":"Line Cleman Hatting,&nbsp;Marie Østergaard Kristensen,&nbsp;Maja Hjelm Lundgaard,&nbsp;Anne Sørensen,&nbsp;Stine Linding Andersen","doi":"10.1186/s13044-023-00151-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thyroid disease in pregnant women is a matter of clinical awareness, and current clinical guidelines recommend a risk-based screening strategy. This study aimed to evaluate current clinical practice regarding screening for thyroid disease in pregnancy in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed in the North Denmark Region with consecutive inclusion of 150 pregnant women from Aalborg University Hospital each year in 2020 and 2021. Medical records were reviewed according to the recommended risk-based screening criteria for thyroid disease in pregnancy. Any measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) was assessed 3 months prior to and in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether 292 pregnant women who received no current treatment for thyroid disease were included. A total of 81 (27.7%) had a measurement of TSH before or during the pregnancy, and 30 women (10.3%) in the early pregnancy specifically. One or more of the screening criteria for thyroid disease recommended in the Danish clinical practice guideline were fulfilled in 37 of the 81 women (45.7%) with thyroid function tested and among 41 of the 211 (19.4%) women who did not have thyroid function tested before or during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a Danish regional investigation, 1 in 4 women had their thyroid function tested in relation to a pregnancy. However, recommended risk-based screening criteria for thyroid disease in pregnancy were heterogeneously distributed. Results encourage considerations on the current practice for the screening of thyroid function in Danish pregnant women and inform the general debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":39048,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-023-00151-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thyroid disease in pregnant women is a matter of clinical awareness, and current clinical guidelines recommend a risk-based screening strategy. This study aimed to evaluate current clinical practice regarding screening for thyroid disease in pregnancy in Denmark.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in the North Denmark Region with consecutive inclusion of 150 pregnant women from Aalborg University Hospital each year in 2020 and 2021. Medical records were reviewed according to the recommended risk-based screening criteria for thyroid disease in pregnancy. Any measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) was assessed 3 months prior to and in pregnancy.

Results: Altogether 292 pregnant women who received no current treatment for thyroid disease were included. A total of 81 (27.7%) had a measurement of TSH before or during the pregnancy, and 30 women (10.3%) in the early pregnancy specifically. One or more of the screening criteria for thyroid disease recommended in the Danish clinical practice guideline were fulfilled in 37 of the 81 women (45.7%) with thyroid function tested and among 41 of the 211 (19.4%) women who did not have thyroid function tested before or during pregnancy.

Conclusion: In a Danish regional investigation, 1 in 4 women had their thyroid function tested in relation to a pregnancy. However, recommended risk-based screening criteria for thyroid disease in pregnancy were heterogeneously distributed. Results encourage considerations on the current practice for the screening of thyroid function in Danish pregnant women and inform the general debate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期甲状腺疾病筛查:丹麦临床实践研究
背景:孕妇甲状腺疾病是一个临床意识问题,目前的临床指南推荐基于风险的筛查策略。本研究旨在评估目前丹麦妊娠期甲状腺疾病筛查的临床实践。方法:在北丹麦地区进行横断面研究,于2020年和2021年每年连续纳入150名来自奥尔堡大学医院的孕妇。根据建议的基于风险的妊娠甲状腺疾病筛查标准对医疗记录进行了审查。任何促甲状腺激素(TSH)的测量在怀孕前3个月和怀孕期间进行评估。结果:共有292名目前未接受甲状腺疾病治疗的孕妇被纳入研究。共有81人(27.7%)在怀孕前或怀孕期间测量了TSH, 30人(10.3%)在怀孕早期。81名接受甲状腺功能检测的妇女中有37名(45.7%)达到了丹麦临床实践指南中推荐的一项或多项甲状腺疾病筛查标准,211名未在怀孕前或怀孕期间接受甲状腺功能检测的妇女中有41名(19.4%)达到了标准。结论:在丹麦的一项地区调查中,四分之一的妇女在怀孕期间进行了甲状腺功能测试。然而,推荐的基于风险的妊娠甲状腺疾病筛查标准分布不均。结果鼓励对丹麦孕妇甲状腺功能筛查的现行做法进行考虑,并为一般性辩论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid Research
Thyroid Research Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Losartan is more effective than angiotensin (1-7) in preventing thyroxine-induced renal injury in the rat. The diagnostic performance of neck ultrasound in follow-up of advanced stage differentiated thyroid cancer. Sonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules with a Halo. Correlation between gene mutations and clinical characteristics in papillary thyroid cancer: a retrospective analysis of BRAF mutations and RET rearrangements. Identification of LINC02454-related key pathways and genes in papillary thyroid cancer by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1