Survival Outcomes of Post-mastectomy Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Hypofractionated Radiation Treatment Compared to Conventional Fractionation -a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Q3 Medicine The gulf journal of oncology Pub Date : 2023-05-01
Ciniraj Raveendran, Suma Susan Meloot, I Yadev
{"title":"Survival Outcomes of Post-mastectomy Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Hypofractionated Radiation Treatment Compared to Conventional Fractionation -a Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ciniraj Raveendran, Suma Susan Meloot, I Yadev","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For post-mastectomy patients, radiation treatment with conventional fractionation with a treatment duration of five weeks was the frequently used regimen, whereas hypofractionated regimens are recently used in the adjuvant treatment, which has a shorter treatment time over three weeks. We determined to estimate the treatment outcome by survival analysis between these two fractionation schedules to determine if any difference exists between these two groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the data of 348 breast cancer patients who had received adjuvant radiation treatment to the breast from January 2010 to December 2013. After assessing the eligibility criteria, 317 patients had received post-mastectomy radiation treatment to the chest wall and axilla and followed up till December 2018. The conventional fractionation schedule consisted of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, 2 Gy per fraction over five weeks, whereas the hypofractionated schedule was 42.6 Gy in 16 fractions with 2.66 Gy per fraction, over 3.2 weeks. Survival outcomes using 5- year Overall survival and 5-year Disease-free survival between these two fractionations were estimated and compared between the conventional and hypofractionated radiation treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were females with a median age of 50 [IQR 45 to 58] and a median follow-up of 60 months. Of the 317 patients, 194 (61%) received hypofractionated radiation and 123(39%) conventional fractionation. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 5- year survival rate were 81% (95% CI = 74.9 to 87.6%) for the hypofractionated group (n = 194) and 87.8% (95% CI = 81.5 to 94.6%) for the conventional fractionation group (n = 123). The log-rank test revealed no evidence of a difference between the survival rates over time (p= 0.1 ). Restricted mean survival time in the hypofractionated group was 54.5 months, and in the conventional fractionation group was 57 months. Further investigation with cox proportional hazards regression analysis, which controlled for age, N stage, and T stage, showed that patients with conventional fractionation radiotherapy were 0.6 times less likely to die than those with hypofractionated radiation (95% CI for the hazard or risk ratio = 0.31 to 1.21; P = 0.2). However, there is no statistical evidence to say the reduction in mortality is different from null. 5-year disease-free survival for the hypofractionated group (n= 194) was 62.6% (55.7-70.2) whereas that for the conventional fractionation group (n=123) was 67.8% (59.8-76.8). However, there was no evidence to say any difference between the disease-free survival rates on the log-rank test (p=0.39). Restricted mean diseasefree survival time in the hypofractionated group was 45.1 months compared to 46.9 months for the conventional fractionation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In post-mastectomy breast cancer patients receiving radiation treatment, the survival outcome with conventional and hypofractionated radiation therapy is comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For post-mastectomy patients, radiation treatment with conventional fractionation with a treatment duration of five weeks was the frequently used regimen, whereas hypofractionated regimens are recently used in the adjuvant treatment, which has a shorter treatment time over three weeks. We determined to estimate the treatment outcome by survival analysis between these two fractionation schedules to determine if any difference exists between these two groups.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 348 breast cancer patients who had received adjuvant radiation treatment to the breast from January 2010 to December 2013. After assessing the eligibility criteria, 317 patients had received post-mastectomy radiation treatment to the chest wall and axilla and followed up till December 2018. The conventional fractionation schedule consisted of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, 2 Gy per fraction over five weeks, whereas the hypofractionated schedule was 42.6 Gy in 16 fractions with 2.66 Gy per fraction, over 3.2 weeks. Survival outcomes using 5- year Overall survival and 5-year Disease-free survival between these two fractionations were estimated and compared between the conventional and hypofractionated radiation treatment.

Results: All patients were females with a median age of 50 [IQR 45 to 58] and a median follow-up of 60 months. Of the 317 patients, 194 (61%) received hypofractionated radiation and 123(39%) conventional fractionation. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 5- year survival rate were 81% (95% CI = 74.9 to 87.6%) for the hypofractionated group (n = 194) and 87.8% (95% CI = 81.5 to 94.6%) for the conventional fractionation group (n = 123). The log-rank test revealed no evidence of a difference between the survival rates over time (p= 0.1 ). Restricted mean survival time in the hypofractionated group was 54.5 months, and in the conventional fractionation group was 57 months. Further investigation with cox proportional hazards regression analysis, which controlled for age, N stage, and T stage, showed that patients with conventional fractionation radiotherapy were 0.6 times less likely to die than those with hypofractionated radiation (95% CI for the hazard or risk ratio = 0.31 to 1.21; P = 0.2). However, there is no statistical evidence to say the reduction in mortality is different from null. 5-year disease-free survival for the hypofractionated group (n= 194) was 62.6% (55.7-70.2) whereas that for the conventional fractionation group (n=123) was 67.8% (59.8-76.8). However, there was no evidence to say any difference between the disease-free survival rates on the log-rank test (p=0.39). Restricted mean diseasefree survival time in the hypofractionated group was 45.1 months compared to 46.9 months for the conventional fractionation group.

Conclusion: In post-mastectomy breast cancer patients receiving radiation treatment, the survival outcome with conventional and hypofractionated radiation therapy is comparable.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与传统分次放射治疗相比,乳腺癌切除术后采用低分次放射治疗的患者的生存结果--一项回顾性队列研究。
简介对于乳房切除术后的患者,常用的放射治疗方案是治疗时间为五周的常规分次疗法,而最近在辅助治疗中使用的是治疗时间较短的三周以上的低分次疗法。我们决定通过生存分析来估算这两种分次方案的治疗效果,以确定这两组之间是否存在差异:我们回顾性审查了 2010 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间接受乳腺辅助放射治疗的 348 名乳腺癌患者的数据。在对资格标准进行评估后,有317名患者接受了乳房切除术后胸壁和腋窝的放射治疗,并随访至2018年12月。常规分次治疗计划包括25次分次,每次50Gy,每次2Gy,疗程5周;低分次治疗计划包括16次分次,每次42.6Gy,每次2.66Gy,疗程3.2周。对这两种分次放疗的 5 年总生存率和 5 年无病生存率进行了估算,并对传统放疗和低分次放疗的生存率进行了比较:所有患者均为女性,中位年龄为 50 岁[IQR 45 至 58],中位随访时间为 60 个月。在317名患者中,194人(61%)接受了低分次放射治疗,123人(39%)接受了常规分次放射治疗。根据 Kaplan-Meier 估计,低分次照射组(194 人)的 5 年生存率为 81%(95% CI = 74.9 至 87.6%),常规分次照射组(123 人)的 5 年生存率为 87.8%(95% CI = 81.5 至 94.6%)。对数秩检验显示,随着时间的推移,存活率之间没有差异(P= 0.1)。低分次治疗组的限制性平均存活时间为54.5个月,常规分次治疗组为57个月。通过控制年龄、N分期和T分期的cox比例危险回归分析进行的进一步调查显示,接受常规分次放疗的患者的死亡几率是接受低分次放疗患者的0.6倍(危险或风险比的95% CI = 0.31至1.21;P = 0.2)。不过,没有统计证据表明死亡率的降低与零有差异。低分次治疗组(194人)的5年无病生存率为62.6%(55.7-70.2),而常规分次治疗组(123人)的5年无病生存率为67.8%(59.8-76.8)。不过,没有证据表明无病生存率之间存在对数秩检验差异(P=0.39)。低分化组的限制性平均无病生存期为45.1个月,而传统分化组为46.9个月:结论:对于乳房切除术后接受放射治疗的乳腺癌患者,常规分次放射治疗和低分次放射治疗的生存期相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The gulf journal of oncology
The gulf journal of oncology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Assessing Mismatch Repair Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma -Insight from a Tertiary Care Centre. Assessment of Radiation Induced Pneumonitis and Pericarditis in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Treatment Using Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique. Comparison of Acute Toxicities, Overall Treatment Time and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy. Cost of Healthcare Services in Geriatric Neuro-oncology: A descriptive Analysis. Establishing and Monitoring an Effective Management of Benign Nontoxic Multinodular Goitre in Kuwait "Utilizing Two Different Dose Levels of Recombinant Human TSH in Combination with Radioactive Iodine".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1