Impact of Bracing and Therapy Services on Perioperative Costs for Patients Undergoing Distal Biceps Tendon Repair.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.019
Jessica L Baylor, Austin Kloc, Stephanie Delma, Brian K Foster, Louis C Grandizio
{"title":"Impact of Bracing and Therapy Services on Perioperative Costs for Patients Undergoing Distal Biceps Tendon Repair.","authors":"Jessica L Baylor, Austin Kloc, Stephanie Delma, Brian K Foster, Louis C Grandizio","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to quantify and assess perioperative costs in an integrated healthcare system for patients undergoing distal biceps tendon (DBT) repair with and without the use of postoperative bracing and formal physical (PT) or occupational (OT) therapy services. In addition, we aimed to define clinical outcomes after DBT repair using a brace-free, therapy-free protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed all cases of DBT repairs within our integrated system from 2015 to 2021. We performed a retrospective review of a series of DBT repairs utilizing the brace-free, therapy-free protocol. For patients with our integrated insurance plan, a cost analysis was conducted. Claims were subdivided to assess total charges, costs to the insurer, and patient costs. Three groups were created for comparisons of total costs: (1) patients who had both postoperative bracing and PT/OT, (2) patients who had either postoperative bracing or PT/OT, and (3) patients who had neither postoperative bracing nor PT/OT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 patients had our institutional insurance plan and were included in the cost analysis. For patients using both bracing and PT/OT, these services contributed 12% and 8% of the total perioperative costs, respectively. Implant costs accounted for 28% of the overall cost. Forty-four patients were included in the retrospective review with a mean follow-up of 17 months. The overall QuickDASH was 12; two cases resulted in unresolved neuropraxia, and there were no cases of re-rupture, infection, or reoperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within an integrated healthcare system, postoperative bracing and PT/OT services increase the cost of care for DBT repair and account for 20% of the total perioperative charges in cases where bracing and therapy are used. Considering the results of prior investigations indicating that formal PT/OT and bracing offer no clinical advantages over immediate range of motion (ROM) and self-directed rehabilitation, upper-extremity surgeons should forego routine brace and PT/OT utilization after DBT repair.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"94.e1-94.e8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to quantify and assess perioperative costs in an integrated healthcare system for patients undergoing distal biceps tendon (DBT) repair with and without the use of postoperative bracing and formal physical (PT) or occupational (OT) therapy services. In addition, we aimed to define clinical outcomes after DBT repair using a brace-free, therapy-free protocol.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of DBT repairs within our integrated system from 2015 to 2021. We performed a retrospective review of a series of DBT repairs utilizing the brace-free, therapy-free protocol. For patients with our integrated insurance plan, a cost analysis was conducted. Claims were subdivided to assess total charges, costs to the insurer, and patient costs. Three groups were created for comparisons of total costs: (1) patients who had both postoperative bracing and PT/OT, (2) patients who had either postoperative bracing or PT/OT, and (3) patients who had neither postoperative bracing nor PT/OT.

Results: A total of 36 patients had our institutional insurance plan and were included in the cost analysis. For patients using both bracing and PT/OT, these services contributed 12% and 8% of the total perioperative costs, respectively. Implant costs accounted for 28% of the overall cost. Forty-four patients were included in the retrospective review with a mean follow-up of 17 months. The overall QuickDASH was 12; two cases resulted in unresolved neuropraxia, and there were no cases of re-rupture, infection, or reoperation.

Conclusions: Within an integrated healthcare system, postoperative bracing and PT/OT services increase the cost of care for DBT repair and account for 20% of the total perioperative charges in cases where bracing and therapy are used. Considering the results of prior investigations indicating that formal PT/OT and bracing offer no clinical advantages over immediate range of motion (ROM) and self-directed rehabilitation, upper-extremity surgeons should forego routine brace and PT/OT utilization after DBT repair.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支具和治疗服务对二头肌远端肌腱修复患者围手术期费用的影响。
目的:本研究旨在量化和评估综合医疗保健系统中接受远端肱二头肌腱(DBT)修复的患者的围手术期成本,无论是否使用术后支架和正式的物理(PT)或职业(OT)治疗服务。此外,我们的目的是确定使用无支架、无治疗方案的DBT修复后的临床结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年至2021年我们综合系统内所有DBT修复病例。我们对采用无支架、无治疗方案的一系列DBT修复进行了回顾性回顾。对于我们的综合保险计划的患者,进行了成本分析。索赔被细分以评估总费用、保险公司的费用和患者的费用。为了比较总成本,我们创建了三组:(1)同时使用术后支架和PT/OT的患者,(2)既使用术后支架又使用PT/OT的患者,以及(3)既不使用术后支架也不使用PT/OT的患者。结果:共有36例患者参加了我们的机构保险计划,并被纳入成本分析。对于同时使用支具和PT/OT的患者,这些服务分别占围手术期总费用的12%和8%。植入费用占总费用的28%。44例患者纳入回顾性研究,平均随访时间为17个月。总体QuickDASH为12;2例导致未解决的神经失用症,无再破裂、感染或再手术病例。结论:在综合医疗保健系统中,术后支具和PT/OT服务增加了DBT修复的护理成本,在使用支具和治疗的情况下,占围手术期总费用的20%。考虑到先前的研究结果表明,正规的PT/OT和支具与即时活动范围(ROM)和自主康复相比没有临床优势,上肢外科医生应该在DBT修复后放弃常规的支具和PT/OT的使用。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Palmar Radiocarpal Artery Vascularized Bone Graft with Alternatives for Unstable Scaphoid Nonunions: A Retrospective Analysis. Tendon Inversion Improves Tendon-to-Bone Healing in a Rat Bicep Tenodesis Model. Incidence and Presentation of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Primary Metacarpophalangeal and Proximal Interphalangeal Arthroplasty. The Displaced Fleck Sign: Description of a Radiographic Finding Consistent with Grade III Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears with Stener Lesions. Time to Recovery of Radial Nerve Palsy After Surgically Treated Humeral Shaft Fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1