An equity-focused approach to improving access to COVID-19 vaccination using mobile health clinics

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100690
Carlene A. Mayfield , Jennifer S. Priem , Michael Inman , Trent Legare , Jennifer Snow , Elizabeth Wallace
{"title":"An equity-focused approach to improving access to COVID-19 vaccination using mobile health clinics","authors":"Carlene A. Mayfield ,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Priem ,&nbsp;Michael Inman ,&nbsp;Trent Legare ,&nbsp;Jennifer Snow ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Wallace","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article describes the implementation of an equity-focused strategy to increase the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among communities of color and in traditionally underserved geographic areas using mobile health clinics (MHCs). The MHC Vaccination Program was implemented through a large integrated healthcare system in North Carolina using a grassroots development and engagement strategy along with a robust model for data-informed decision support to prioritize vulnerable communities. Several valuable lessons from this work can replicated for future outreach initiatives and community-based programming:</p><p>•Health systems can no longer operate under the assumption that community members will come to them, particularly those experiencing compounding social and economic challenges. The MHC model had to be a proactive outreach to community members, rather than a responsive delivery mechanism.</p><p>•Barriers to access included financial, legal, and logistical challenges, in addition to mistrust among historically underserved and marginalized communities.</p><p>•A MHC model can be adaptable and responsive to data-informed decision-making approaches for targeted service delivery.</p><p>•A MHC model is not a one-dimensional solution to access, but part of a broader strategy to create diverse points of entry into the healthcare system that fall within the rhythm of life of community members.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"11 2","pages":"Article 100690"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076423000179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes the implementation of an equity-focused strategy to increase the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among communities of color and in traditionally underserved geographic areas using mobile health clinics (MHCs). The MHC Vaccination Program was implemented through a large integrated healthcare system in North Carolina using a grassroots development and engagement strategy along with a robust model for data-informed decision support to prioritize vulnerable communities. Several valuable lessons from this work can replicated for future outreach initiatives and community-based programming:

•Health systems can no longer operate under the assumption that community members will come to them, particularly those experiencing compounding social and economic challenges. The MHC model had to be a proactive outreach to community members, rather than a responsive delivery mechanism.

•Barriers to access included financial, legal, and logistical challenges, in addition to mistrust among historically underserved and marginalized communities.

•A MHC model can be adaptable and responsive to data-informed decision-making approaches for targeted service delivery.

•A MHC model is not a one-dimensional solution to access, but part of a broader strategy to create diverse points of entry into the healthcare system that fall within the rhythm of life of community members.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以公平为重点的方法,利用流动卫生诊所改善COVID-19疫苗接种
本文介绍了一项以公平为重点的战略的实施情况,该战略旨在利用流动卫生诊所(MHCs)在有色人种社区和传统上服务不足的地理区域增加COVID-19疫苗接种。MHC疫苗接种计划是通过北卡罗莱纳州的一个大型综合医疗保健系统实施的,该系统采用基层发展和参与战略以及数据知情决策支持的稳健模型,以优先考虑弱势社区。从这项工作中获得的一些宝贵经验可以复制到未来的推广行动和社区规划中:•卫生系统不能再假设社区成员会来找他们,特别是那些面临复杂社会和经济挑战的人。MHC模式必须是一种主动向社区成员伸出援手的模式,而不是一种响应式的交付机制。•获取服务的障碍包括金融、法律和后勤方面的挑战,以及历史上服务不足和边缘化社区之间的不信任。•MHC模型可以适应并响应数据知情的决策方法,以提供有针对性的服务。•MHC模式不是一种单一的获取解决方案,而是一个更广泛战略的一部分,该战略旨在创建符合社区成员生活节奏的医疗保健系统的不同入口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Reading the crystal ball: Primary care implications while awaiting outcomes for multi-cancer early detection tests" [Healthcare 11 (2023) 100705]. The national ambulatory medical care survey (NAMCS) at fifty: Past and future Implementation and adaptation of clinical quality improvement opioid measures Association between patient-reported financial burden and catastrophic health expenditures in cancer survivors Outpatient remdesivir treatment program for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019: Patient perceptions, process and economic impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1