Improving primary care team functioning through evidence based quality improvement: A comparative case study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100691
Helen Ovsepyan , Emmeline Chuang , Julian Brunner , Alison B. Hamilton , Jack Needleman , MarySue Heilemann , Ismelda Canelo , Elizabeth M. Yano
{"title":"Improving primary care team functioning through evidence based quality improvement: A comparative case study","authors":"Helen Ovsepyan ,&nbsp;Emmeline Chuang ,&nbsp;Julian Brunner ,&nbsp;Alison B. Hamilton ,&nbsp;Jack Needleman ,&nbsp;MarySue Heilemann ,&nbsp;Ismelda Canelo ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Yano","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Provision of team-based primary care (PC) is associated with improved care quality, but limited empirical evidence guides practices on how to optimize team functioning. We examined how evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) was used to change PC team processes. EBQI activities were supported by research-clinical partnerships and included multilevel </span>stakeholder engagement, external facilitation, technical support, formative feedback, QI training, local QI development and across-site collaboration to share proven practices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a comparative case study in two VA medical centers (Sites A and B) that engaged in EBQI between 2014 and 2016. We analyzed multiple qualitative data sources: baseline and follow-up interviews with key stakeholders and provider team (“teamlet”) members (n = 64), and EBQI meeting notes, reports, and supporting materials.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Site A's QI project entailed engaging in structured daily huddles using a huddle checklist and developing a protocol clarifying team member roles and responsibilities; Site B initiated weekly virtual team meetings that spanned two practice locations. Respondents from both sites perceived these projects as improving team structure and staffing, team communications, role clarity, staff voice and personhood, accountability, and ultimately, overall team functioning over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EBQI enabled local QI teams and other stakeholders to develop and implement innovations to improve PC team processes and characteristics in ways that improved teamlet members’ perceptions of team functioning.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>EBQI's multi-level approach may empower staff and facilitate innovation by and within teams, making it an effective implementation strategy for addressing unique practice-based challenges and supporting improvements in team functioning across varied clinical settings.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>VI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"11 2","pages":"Article 100691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076423000180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Provision of team-based primary care (PC) is associated with improved care quality, but limited empirical evidence guides practices on how to optimize team functioning. We examined how evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) was used to change PC team processes. EBQI activities were supported by research-clinical partnerships and included multilevel stakeholder engagement, external facilitation, technical support, formative feedback, QI training, local QI development and across-site collaboration to share proven practices.

Methods

We used a comparative case study in two VA medical centers (Sites A and B) that engaged in EBQI between 2014 and 2016. We analyzed multiple qualitative data sources: baseline and follow-up interviews with key stakeholders and provider team (“teamlet”) members (n = 64), and EBQI meeting notes, reports, and supporting materials.

Results

Site A's QI project entailed engaging in structured daily huddles using a huddle checklist and developing a protocol clarifying team member roles and responsibilities; Site B initiated weekly virtual team meetings that spanned two practice locations. Respondents from both sites perceived these projects as improving team structure and staffing, team communications, role clarity, staff voice and personhood, accountability, and ultimately, overall team functioning over time.

Conclusion

EBQI enabled local QI teams and other stakeholders to develop and implement innovations to improve PC team processes and characteristics in ways that improved teamlet members’ perceptions of team functioning.

Implications

EBQI's multi-level approach may empower staff and facilitate innovation by and within teams, making it an effective implementation strategy for addressing unique practice-based challenges and supporting improvements in team functioning across varied clinical settings.

Level of evidence

VI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基于证据的质量改进改善初级保健团队的功能:一个比较案例研究
背景提供基于团队的初级保健(PC)与提高护理质量有关,但有限的经验证据指导了如何优化团队运作的实践。我们研究了循证质量改进(EBQI)是如何用于改变PC团队流程的。EBQI活动得到了研究-临床合作伙伴关系的支持,包括多层次的利益相关者参与、外部促进、技术支持、形成性反馈、QI培训、本地QI开发和跨站点合作,以分享经验证的实践。方法我们对2014年至2016年间参与EBQI的两个VA医疗中心(a和B)进行了比较案例研究。我们分析了多个定性数据来源:对关键利益相关者和提供商团队(“teamlet”)成员(n=64)的基线和后续访谈,以及EBQI会议记录、报告和支持材料。结果现场A的QI项目需要使用会议清单进行结构化的日常会议,并制定明确团队成员角色和责任的协议;站点B启动了跨越两个练习地点的每周虚拟团队会议。两个站点的受访者都认为这些项目改善了团队结构和人员配置、团队沟通、角色清晰、员工声音和个性、问责制,并最终改善了团队的整体运作。结论EBQI使当地QI团队和其他利益相关者能够开发和实施创新,以改善PC团队的流程和特征,从而改善小团队成员对团队运作的感知。含义EBQI的多层次方法可以增强员工的能力,促进团队内部和团队内部的创新,使其成为一种有效的实施策略,以应对基于实践的独特挑战,并支持在各种临床环境中改善团队运作。证据级别VI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
期刊最新文献
AI-enabled decision support: The convergence of technology and decision science Corrigendum to "Reading the crystal ball: Primary care implications while awaiting outcomes for multi-cancer early detection tests" [Healthcare 11 (2023) 100705]. The national ambulatory medical care survey (NAMCS) at fifty: Past and future Implementation and adaptation of clinical quality improvement opioid measures Association between patient-reported financial burden and catastrophic health expenditures in cancer survivors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1