Evaluation of Executive Functions With Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Euthymic Bipolar and Borderline Personality Disorders.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.29399/npa.28274
Güney Zeybek Dalyan, Serkan Uslu, Özmen Metin, Tunca Nüzket, Buket Cinemre, Murat Canpolat, Özge Doğanavşargil Baysal
{"title":"Evaluation of Executive Functions With Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Euthymic Bipolar and Borderline Personality Disorders.","authors":"Güney Zeybek Dalyan,&nbsp;Serkan Uslu,&nbsp;Özmen Metin,&nbsp;Tunca Nüzket,&nbsp;Buket Cinemre,&nbsp;Murat Canpolat,&nbsp;Özge Doğanavşargil Baysal","doi":"10.29399/npa.28274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bipolar disorder (BD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are often indistinguishable, given both the key features of impulsivity and emotional dysregulation. This indicates widespread comorbidity and potential misdiagnosis in both groups. Therefore, this study aimed to differentiate BD and BPD by using alterations of brain hemodynamics under the influence of executive tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with the euthymic phase of BD and 20 patients with BPD, and 20 healthy control subjects were included in this study. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) hemodynamic responses were evaluated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during the Stroop Test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activation was significantly decreased in BPD during both tests. On the other hand, the BD group showed medial PFC hypoactivation during both tests, and this finding is distinct from BPD (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that brain hemodynamics during the executive test can highlight differences between BP and BPD. While medial PFC hypoactivation was more prominent in the BP group, DLPFC hypoactivation was more pronounced in the BPD group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51142,"journal":{"name":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242290/pdf/archneuro-60-110.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.28274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar disorder (BD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are often indistinguishable, given both the key features of impulsivity and emotional dysregulation. This indicates widespread comorbidity and potential misdiagnosis in both groups. Therefore, this study aimed to differentiate BD and BPD by using alterations of brain hemodynamics under the influence of executive tests.

Methods: Twenty patients with the euthymic phase of BD and 20 patients with BPD, and 20 healthy control subjects were included in this study. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) hemodynamic responses were evaluated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during the Stroop Test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST).

Results: Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activation was significantly decreased in BPD during both tests. On the other hand, the BD group showed medial PFC hypoactivation during both tests, and this finding is distinct from BPD (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that brain hemodynamics during the executive test can highlight differences between BP and BPD. While medial PFC hypoactivation was more prominent in the BP group, DLPFC hypoactivation was more pronounced in the BPD group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用功能近红外光谱评价良性双相和边缘型人格障碍患者的执行功能。
导读:双相情感障碍(BD)和边缘型人格障碍(BPD)通常难以区分,因为两者都具有冲动性和情绪失调的关键特征。这表明在两组中普遍存在合并症和潜在的误诊。因此,本研究旨在通过执行测试影响下脑血流动力学的改变来区分BD和BPD。方法:选取20例双相心境期患者和20例双相心境期患者以及20例健康对照。采用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)评价Stroop测验和威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)时前额叶皮层(PFC)血流动力学反应。结果:在两种测试中,BPD患者的左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)激活均显著降低。另一方面,BD组在两项测试中均表现出内侧PFC低激活,这一发现与BPD不同(结论:我们的研究结果表明,执行测试期间的脑血流动力学可以突出BP和BPD之间的差异。内侧PFC失活在BP组更为突出,而DLPFC失活在BPD组更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Neuropsychiatry (Arch Neuropsychiatry) is the official journal of the Turkish Neuropsychiatric Society. It is published quarterly, and four editions annually constitute a volume. Archives of Neuropsychiatry is a peer reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles on psychiatry, neurology, and behavioural sciences. Both clinical and basic science contributions are welcomed. Submissions that address topics in the interface of neurology and psychiatry are encouraged. The content covers original research articles, reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Are the Symptom Dimensions in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Related to Thought-Action Fusion, Magical Thinking, and Schizotypal Personality Traits? Evaluation of the Correlation Between Peripheral Inflammatory Markers and Suicide Risk in Drug-Naive First-Episode Schizophrenia. Gene Expression Levels Related to Histone Acetylation are Altered in Parkinson Disease Patients. Evaluation of Clinical Effects of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccines on Myasthenia Gravis. Comparing Serum AMH, InhB, Testosterone Levels and Finger Length Ratio (2D/4D) of Male Children with Specific Learning Disorder and Controls.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1