Consistency of the results of neurophysiological examinations with clinical diagnosis formed by the referring physician in ambulatory medical care.

Jan P Bembenek, Anna Sobańska, Tomasz Litwin
{"title":"Consistency of the results of neurophysiological examinations with clinical diagnosis formed by the referring physician in ambulatory medical care.","authors":"Jan P Bembenek,&nbsp;Anna Sobańska,&nbsp;Tomasz Litwin","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2023.127234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Access to electroneurographic/electromyographic (ENG/EMG) examinations and the number of patients referred for electrodiagnostic (EDX) examination are increasing. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the initial clinical diagnosis made by outpatient medical care physicians who referred patients to the EMG laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed referrals and EDX results of all patients who visited EMG laboratory of the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw in 2021. Examinations were performed in accordance with the standards and norms adopted in our laboratory by EMG-certified neurologists, regarding the initial diagnosis stated by referring physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 454 EDX results from 412 patients were analyzed. Most of patients (54.6%) were referred with diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), followed by single nerves damage (18.7%), polyneuropathy (18.1%), tetany (7.0%), myasthenia gravis (1.3%) or myopathy (0.2%). The result of the ENG/EMG examination was: diagnosis confirmation (61.9%), a new clinically significant diagnosis or additional asymptomatic nerve damage (32.4%), and normal examination result (25.1%) of patients. Electrophysiological examination most often confirmed the referral diagnosis in patients with suspected CTS (75.4%), followed by single nerves damage (51.8%), polyneuropathy (48.8%), tetany (31.3%) and the least for myasthenia gravis and myopathy (0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed frequent inconsistency of the EDX results with the clinical diagnosis formed by the referring physician. A high percentage of normal test results was noted. Initial diagnosis and the scope of EDX examination should be determined by detailed interview and physical examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":74481,"journal":{"name":"Postepy psychiatrii neurologii","volume":"32 1","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/e4/PPN-32-50651.PMC10243291.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy psychiatrii neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2023.127234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Access to electroneurographic/electromyographic (ENG/EMG) examinations and the number of patients referred for electrodiagnostic (EDX) examination are increasing. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the initial clinical diagnosis made by outpatient medical care physicians who referred patients to the EMG laboratory.

Methods: We analyzed referrals and EDX results of all patients who visited EMG laboratory of the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw in 2021. Examinations were performed in accordance with the standards and norms adopted in our laboratory by EMG-certified neurologists, regarding the initial diagnosis stated by referring physicians.

Results: A total of 454 EDX results from 412 patients were analyzed. Most of patients (54.6%) were referred with diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), followed by single nerves damage (18.7%), polyneuropathy (18.1%), tetany (7.0%), myasthenia gravis (1.3%) or myopathy (0.2%). The result of the ENG/EMG examination was: diagnosis confirmation (61.9%), a new clinically significant diagnosis or additional asymptomatic nerve damage (32.4%), and normal examination result (25.1%) of patients. Electrophysiological examination most often confirmed the referral diagnosis in patients with suspected CTS (75.4%), followed by single nerves damage (51.8%), polyneuropathy (48.8%), tetany (31.3%) and the least for myasthenia gravis and myopathy (0%).

Conclusions: Our study showed frequent inconsistency of the EDX results with the clinical diagnosis formed by the referring physician. A high percentage of normal test results was noted. Initial diagnosis and the scope of EDX examination should be determined by detailed interview and physical examination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经生理检查结果与门诊医师所作临床诊断的一致性。
目的:获得神经电图/肌电图(ENG/EMG)检查和转介进行电诊断(EDX)检查的患者数量正在增加。我们的目的是确定门诊医生将患者转介到肌电图实验室进行初步临床诊断的准确性。方法:分析2021年华沙精神病学和神经病学研究所临床神经生理学系EMG实验室所有患者的转诊和EDX结果。检查按照经肌电图认证的神经科医生在我们实验室采用的标准和规范进行,并根据转诊医生的初步诊断进行。结果:共分析了412例患者的454例EDX结果。大多数患者(54.6%)被诊断为腕管综合征(CTS),其次是单侧神经损伤(18.7%)、多发性神经病变(18.1%)、手足颤(7.0%)、重症肌无力(1.3%)或肌病(0.2%)。患者的ENG/EMG检查结果为:确诊(61.9%),新诊断或附加无症状神经损伤(32.4%),检查结果正常(25.1%)。疑似CTS患者的转诊诊断以电生理检查最多(75.4%),其次为单侧神经损伤(51.8%)、多发性神经病变(48.8%)、手足颤(31.3%),重症肌无力和肌病的转诊诊断最少(0%)。结论:我们的研究显示EDX结果与转诊医生的临床诊断经常不一致。注意到正常测试结果的高百分比。初步诊断和EDX检查范围应通过详细的访谈和体格检查确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pathology and treatment methods in pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration. Secretome - the role of extracellular vesicles in the pathogenesis and therapy of neurodegenerative diseases. Severe headache as the first presentation of post-COVID-19 brain and spinal cord injury resembling neurosarcoidosis. The effect of denosumab vs. zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events, including pain-related bone metastasis: a systematic review. Communication issues in co-occurring ADHD and autism spectrum disorders. Evaluative approaches and targeted interventions: mini review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1