Exploring technology-based interventions to improve oral contraceptive pill adherence: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/13625187.2023.2191763
Anne Flynn, Rachel Galvao, Isabella Joslin, Arden McAllister, Nathanael C Koelper, Sarita Sonalkar
{"title":"Exploring technology-based interventions to improve oral contraceptive pill adherence: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Anne Flynn,&nbsp;Rachel Galvao,&nbsp;Isabella Joslin,&nbsp;Arden McAllister,&nbsp;Nathanael C Koelper,&nbsp;Sarita Sonalkar","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2023.2191763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the resources that oral contraceptive pill (OCP) users currently use and wish to use after missing pills.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>People 18-44 years old with a OCP prescription were emailed a cross-sectional survey to assess how they obtain information about managing missed pills, what information they would prefer to access, and whether they would use additional information if it were available. We performed a logistic regression and a dominance analysis to compare independent predictors of desire for a technological resource at the time of missed pills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 166 completed surveys. Nearly half of participants (47%, <i>n</i> = 76, 95% CI 39.0-54.4%) did not seek information about managing their missed pills. When missing a pill, more patients preferred non-technology-based information (57.1%, <i>n</i> = 93, 95% CI 49.3-64.5%) over technology-based information (43%, <i>n</i> = 70, 95% CI 35.5-50.7%). Most reported they would appreciate more information at the time of missed pills (76%, <i>n</i> = 124, 95% CI 68.9-82.0%). The strongest predictors for desire for technology-based information were: current use of technology, lower parity, white race, and higher educational attainment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that most OCP users would utilise additional information at the time of a missed pill if they had access to it and that they desire information in varying formats.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2023.2191763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the resources that oral contraceptive pill (OCP) users currently use and wish to use after missing pills.

Materials and methods: People 18-44 years old with a OCP prescription were emailed a cross-sectional survey to assess how they obtain information about managing missed pills, what information they would prefer to access, and whether they would use additional information if it were available. We performed a logistic regression and a dominance analysis to compare independent predictors of desire for a technological resource at the time of missed pills.

Results: We received 166 completed surveys. Nearly half of participants (47%, n = 76, 95% CI 39.0-54.4%) did not seek information about managing their missed pills. When missing a pill, more patients preferred non-technology-based information (57.1%, n = 93, 95% CI 49.3-64.5%) over technology-based information (43%, n = 70, 95% CI 35.5-50.7%). Most reported they would appreciate more information at the time of missed pills (76%, n = 124, 95% CI 68.9-82.0%). The strongest predictors for desire for technology-based information were: current use of technology, lower parity, white race, and higher educational attainment.

Conclusions: This study indicates that most OCP users would utilise additional information at the time of a missed pill if they had access to it and that they desire information in varying formats.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索基于技术的干预措施,以提高口服避孕药的依从性:一项横断面调查。
目的:评估口服避孕药(OCP)使用者目前使用和丢失避孕药后希望使用的资源。材料和方法:18-44岁有OCP处方的人通过电子邮件进行了一项横断面调查,以评估他们如何获得有关管理漏药的信息,他们希望获得哪些信息,以及如果有额外的信息,他们是否会使用这些信息。我们进行了逻辑回归和优势分析,以比较在漏药时对技术资源的渴望的独立预测因子。结果:共收到166份问卷。近一半的参与者(47%,n = 76, 95% CI 39.0-54.4%)没有寻求关于如何处理漏服药的信息。当丢失药丸时,更多的患者选择非技术信息(57.1%,n = 93, 95% CI 49.3-64.5%)而不是技术信息(43%,n = 70, 95% CI 35.5-50.7%)。大多数人报告说,他们希望在漏药时获得更多的信息(76%,n = 124, 95% CI 68.9-82.0%)。对基于技术的信息的渴望的最强预测因子是:当前技术的使用,较低的平等,白人种族和较高的教育程度。结论:这项研究表明,大多数OCP使用者会利用额外的信息,在漏药的时候,如果他们有机会获得它,他们希望在不同的格式的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
期刊最新文献
A randomised double-blind trial to determine the bleeding profile of the prolonged-release contraceptive dienogest 2 mg/ethinylestradiol 0.02 mg versus an immediate-release formulation of drospirenone 3 mg/ethinylestradiol 0.02 mg. Medical termination of pregnancy: people's expectations and experiences in the Netherlands. Neighbourhood environment and early menarche among adolescent girls of five countries. Postpartum contraception provision across Europe: preliminary findings from a multi country survey. Response to Daungsupawong and Wiwanitkit's Letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1