Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach.

Maya Illipse, Kamila Czene, Per Hall, Keith Humphreys
{"title":"Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach.","authors":"Maya Illipse, Kamila Czene, Per Hall, Keith Humphreys","doi":"10.1186/s13058-023-01667-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Researchers have suggested that longitudinal trajectories of mammographic breast density (MD) can be used to understand changes in breast cancer (BC) risk over a woman's lifetime. Some have suggested, based on biological arguments, that the cumulative trajectory of MD encapsulates the risk of BC across time. Others have tried to connect changes in MD to the risk of BC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To summarize the MD-BC association, we jointly model longitudinal trajectories of MD and time to diagnosis using data from a large ([Formula: see text]) mammography cohort of Swedish women aged 40-80 years. Five hundred eighteen women were diagnosed with BC during follow-up. We fitted three joint models (JMs) with different association structures; Cumulative, current value and slope, and current value association structures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models showed evidence of an association between MD trajectory and BC risk ([Formula: see text] for current value of MD, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for current value and slope of MD respectively, and [Formula: see text] for cumulative value of MD). Models with cumulative association structure and with current value and slope association structure had better goodness of fit than a model based only on current value. The JM with current value and slope structure suggested that a decrease in MD may be associated with an increased (instantaneous) BC risk. It is possible that this is because of increased screening sensitivity rather than being related to biology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We argue that a JM with a cumulative association structure may be the most appropriate/biologically relevant model in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":9283,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research : BCR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257295/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research : BCR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01667-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Researchers have suggested that longitudinal trajectories of mammographic breast density (MD) can be used to understand changes in breast cancer (BC) risk over a woman's lifetime. Some have suggested, based on biological arguments, that the cumulative trajectory of MD encapsulates the risk of BC across time. Others have tried to connect changes in MD to the risk of BC.

Methods: To summarize the MD-BC association, we jointly model longitudinal trajectories of MD and time to diagnosis using data from a large ([Formula: see text]) mammography cohort of Swedish women aged 40-80 years. Five hundred eighteen women were diagnosed with BC during follow-up. We fitted three joint models (JMs) with different association structures; Cumulative, current value and slope, and current value association structures.

Results: All models showed evidence of an association between MD trajectory and BC risk ([Formula: see text] for current value of MD, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for current value and slope of MD respectively, and [Formula: see text] for cumulative value of MD). Models with cumulative association structure and with current value and slope association structure had better goodness of fit than a model based only on current value. The JM with current value and slope structure suggested that a decrease in MD may be associated with an increased (instantaneous) BC risk. It is possible that this is because of increased screening sensitivity rather than being related to biology.

Conclusion: We argue that a JM with a cumulative association structure may be the most appropriate/biologically relevant model in this context.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究纵向乳房x线摄影密度测量与乳腺癌风险之间的关系:联合建模方法。
背景:研究人员认为,乳房x线摄影乳腺密度(MD)的纵向轨迹可以用来了解女性一生中乳腺癌(BC)风险的变化。一些人根据生物学观点认为,MD的累积轨迹包含了随时间变化的BC风险。其他人试图将MD的变化与BC的风险联系起来。方法:为了总结MD- bc之间的关系,我们联合建模MD的纵向轨迹和诊断时间,使用来自40-80岁瑞典女性的大型(公式:见文本)乳房x光检查队列数据。在随访期间,518名妇女被诊断为BC。我们拟合了三个具有不同关联结构的联合模型(JMs);累积,现值和斜率,以及现值关联结构。结果:所有模型都显示MD轨迹与BC风险之间存在关联(MD的现值[公式:见文],MD的现值和斜率分别[公式:见文]和[公式:见文],MD的累积值[公式:见文])。具有累积关联结构、当前值和斜率关联结构的模型比仅基于当前值的模型具有更好的拟合优度。具有电流值和斜率结构的JM表明,MD的降低可能与(瞬时)BC风险的增加有关。这可能是因为筛查灵敏度的提高,而不是与生物学有关。结论:我们认为,在这种情况下,具有累积关联结构的JM可能是最合适的/生物学相关的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
siRNA treatment targeting integrin α11 overexpressed via EZH2-driven axis inhibits drug-resistant breast cancer progression. Quantitative characterization of breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue using compartmentalized diffusion-weighted model: comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion and restriction spectrum imaging AMD1 promotes breast cancer aggressiveness via a spermidine-eIF5A hypusination-TCF4 axis NSABP FB-10: a phase Ib/II trial evaluating ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with neratinib in women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer Receptor conversion and survival in breast cancer liver metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1