Labeling and Describing Discrete Emotions in Early Childhood: A Relational Approach

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Affective science Pub Date : 2023-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s42761-022-00170-1
Jennifer M. Knothe, Eric A. Walle
{"title":"Labeling and Describing Discrete Emotions in Early Childhood: A Relational Approach","authors":"Jennifer M. Knothe,&nbsp;Eric A. Walle","doi":"10.1007/s42761-022-00170-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emotion understanding involves appreciating the significance of the relational context; the “aboutness” of the emotion. This study examined how children labeled emotions and described relational elements of discrete emotion contexts. Preschool children (3.5-year-olds, <i>n</i> = 22; 4.5-year-olds, <i>n</i> = 23) described images of 5 emotion contexts (anger, sadness, disgust, fear, and joy). Researchers assessed children’s (1) correct labeling of discrete emotions, and (2) differential mentioning of the emoter (person displaying the emotion) and the referent (the elicitor of the emotion) across discrete emotions. Children’s pattern of accurately labeling discrete emotions was similar to prior research, with both age groups correctly labeled anger, sadness, and joy more often than disgust or fear. Novel to the present study, we found that older children differentially highlighted emotional elements (i.e., the emoter, the referent) when describing discrete emotion contexts. Specifically, 4.5-year-olds emphasized the emoter more when describing anger, sadness, and joy than fear and disgust contexts, and mentioned the referent more in disgust, fear, and joy than anger and sadness contexts. Differential emphasis of relational elements was not observed for 3.5-year-olds. These findings highlight the importance of examining children’s appreciation of relational contexts and indicate important differences in how children differentially emphasize relational elements when viewing discrete emotion contexts. Potential developmental mechanisms, opportunities for further empirical research, and implications for emotion theory are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"4 2","pages":"307 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-022-00170-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-022-00170-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotion understanding involves appreciating the significance of the relational context; the “aboutness” of the emotion. This study examined how children labeled emotions and described relational elements of discrete emotion contexts. Preschool children (3.5-year-olds, n = 22; 4.5-year-olds, n = 23) described images of 5 emotion contexts (anger, sadness, disgust, fear, and joy). Researchers assessed children’s (1) correct labeling of discrete emotions, and (2) differential mentioning of the emoter (person displaying the emotion) and the referent (the elicitor of the emotion) across discrete emotions. Children’s pattern of accurately labeling discrete emotions was similar to prior research, with both age groups correctly labeled anger, sadness, and joy more often than disgust or fear. Novel to the present study, we found that older children differentially highlighted emotional elements (i.e., the emoter, the referent) when describing discrete emotion contexts. Specifically, 4.5-year-olds emphasized the emoter more when describing anger, sadness, and joy than fear and disgust contexts, and mentioned the referent more in disgust, fear, and joy than anger and sadness contexts. Differential emphasis of relational elements was not observed for 3.5-year-olds. These findings highlight the importance of examining children’s appreciation of relational contexts and indicate important differences in how children differentially emphasize relational elements when viewing discrete emotion contexts. Potential developmental mechanisms, opportunities for further empirical research, and implications for emotion theory are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童早期离散情绪的标记和描述:一种关系方法。
情感理解包括欣赏关系语境的意义;情绪的“左右”。这项研究考察了儿童如何标记情绪并描述离散情绪情境中的关系元素。学龄前儿童(3.5岁,n = 22;4.5岁,n = 23)描述了5种情绪背景(愤怒、悲伤、厌恶、恐惧和喜悦)的图像。研究人员评估了儿童(1)对离散情绪的正确标记,以及(2)在离散情绪中对表情符号(表现情绪的人)和参照物(情绪的激发者)的不同提及。儿童准确标记离散情绪的模式与之前的研究相似,两个年龄组都正确标记了愤怒、悲伤和喜悦,而不是厌恶或恐惧。本研究的新颖之处在于,我们发现年龄较大的儿童在描述离散的情绪情境时,会不同地强调情绪元素(即表情符号、被指对象)。具体而言,4.5岁的儿童在描述愤怒、悲伤和喜悦时比在恐惧和厌恶的上下文中更强调表情符号,在厌恶、恐惧和喜悦中比在愤怒和悲伤的上下文中更多地提到指称。在3.5岁的儿童中没有观察到关系元素的差异强调。这些发现强调了检查儿童对关系情境的欣赏的重要性,并表明儿童在观看离散情绪情境时如何差异强调关系元素存在重要差异。讨论了潜在的发展机制、进一步实证研究的机会以及对情绪理论的启示。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s42761-022-00170-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Special Section Commentaries Affectivism and the Emotional Elephant: How a Componential Approach Can Reconcile Opposing Theories to Serve the Future of Affective Sciences A Developmental Psychobiologist’s Commentary on the Future of Affective Science Emotional Overshadowing: Pleasant and Unpleasant Cues Overshadow Neutral Cues in Human Associative Learning Emphasizing the Social in Social Emotion Regulation: A Call for Integration and Expansion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1