Mental health service use and costs associated with complex emotional needs and a diagnosis of personality disorder: analysis of routine data.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1192/bjb.2023.41
Joseph Botham, Alan Simpson, Paul McCrone
{"title":"Mental health service use and costs associated with complex emotional needs and a diagnosis of personality disorder: analysis of routine data.","authors":"Joseph Botham, Alan Simpson, Paul McCrone","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2023.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>We aimed to estimate the costs of care for people with a personality disorder diagnosis and compare service use and costs for those receiving specialist input and those receiving generic care. Service use data were obtained from records and costs calculated. Comparisons were made between those who received care from specialist personality disorder teams and those who did not. Demographic and clinical predictors of costs were identified with regression modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean total costs before diagnosis were £10 156 for the specialist group and £11 531 for the non-specialist group. Post-diagnosis costs were £24 017 and £22 266 respectively. Costs were associated with specialist care, comorbid conditions and living outside of London.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Receiving increased support from a specialist service may reduce the need for in-patient care. This may be clinically appropriate and results in a distribution of costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10985721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and method: We aimed to estimate the costs of care for people with a personality disorder diagnosis and compare service use and costs for those receiving specialist input and those receiving generic care. Service use data were obtained from records and costs calculated. Comparisons were made between those who received care from specialist personality disorder teams and those who did not. Demographic and clinical predictors of costs were identified with regression modelling.

Results: Mean total costs before diagnosis were £10 156 for the specialist group and £11 531 for the non-specialist group. Post-diagnosis costs were £24 017 and £22 266 respectively. Costs were associated with specialist care, comorbid conditions and living outside of London.

Clinical implications: Receiving increased support from a specialist service may reduce the need for in-patient care. This may be clinically appropriate and results in a distribution of costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与复杂情感需求和人格障碍诊断相关的精神健康服务使用情况和成本:常规数据分析。
目的和方法:我们旨在估算人格障碍患者的治疗成本,并比较接受专科治疗和普通治疗的患者的服务使用情况和成本。我们从记录中获取了服务使用数据并计算了成本。对接受了人格障碍专科团队治疗的患者和未接受治疗的患者进行了比较。通过回归模型确定了费用的人口统计学和临床预测因素:专科组诊断前的平均总费用为 10 156 英镑,非专科组为 11 531 英镑。诊断后的费用分别为 24 017 英镑和 22 266 英镑。费用与专科护理、合并症和居住地不在伦敦有关:临床意义:从专科服务中获得更多支持可能会减少住院治疗的需求。临床意义:接受专科服务的更多支持可能会减少对住院治疗的需求,这在临床上可能是合适的,并能分配成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Why regulation hurts: balancing the need to maintain standards with the mental health impact on public sector professionals. Workplace bullying of psychiatric trainees: systematic review. Determining unmet need: clinical relevance of suspected neurodivergence in first-episode psychosis. Barriers to accessing perinatal mental health services and suggestions for improvement: qualitative study of women of Black and south Asian backgrounds. Clinical characteristics and suicidal ideation as predictors of suicide: prospective study of 1000 referrals to general adult psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1