Crossroads of parental decision making: Intersections of hope, communication, relationships, and emotions.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Child Health Care Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-30 DOI:10.1177/13674935211059041
Amie Koch, Tara Albrecht, Arthi S Kozhumam, Heeyeon Son, Debra Brandon, Sharron L Docherty
{"title":"Crossroads of parental decision making: Intersections of hope, communication, relationships, and emotions.","authors":"Amie Koch, Tara Albrecht, Arthi S Kozhumam, Heeyeon Son, Debra Brandon, Sharron L Docherty","doi":"10.1177/13674935211059041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parents of children born with complex life-threatening chronic conditions (CLTCs) experience an uncertain trajectory that requires critical decision making. Along this trajectory, hope plays an influential but largely unexplored role; therefore, this qualitative descriptive study explores how parent and provider hope may influence decision making and care of a child born with CLTCs. A total of 193 interviews from 46 individuals (parents, nurses, physicians, and nurse practitioners) responsible for the care of 11 infants with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD) were analyzed to understand how hope features in experiences related to communication, relationships, and emotions that influence decision making. Overall, parental hope remained strong and played a pivotal role in parental decision making. Parents and professional healthcare providers expressed a range of emotions that appeared to be integrally linked to hope and affected decision making. Providers and parents brought their own judgments, perceptions, and measure of hope to relationships, when there was common ground for expressing, and having, hope, shared decision making was more productive and they developed more effective relationships and communication. Relationships between parents and providers were particularly influenced by and contributory to hope. Communication between parents and providers was also responsible for and responsive to hope.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935211059041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parents of children born with complex life-threatening chronic conditions (CLTCs) experience an uncertain trajectory that requires critical decision making. Along this trajectory, hope plays an influential but largely unexplored role; therefore, this qualitative descriptive study explores how parent and provider hope may influence decision making and care of a child born with CLTCs. A total of 193 interviews from 46 individuals (parents, nurses, physicians, and nurse practitioners) responsible for the care of 11 infants with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD) were analyzed to understand how hope features in experiences related to communication, relationships, and emotions that influence decision making. Overall, parental hope remained strong and played a pivotal role in parental decision making. Parents and professional healthcare providers expressed a range of emotions that appeared to be integrally linked to hope and affected decision making. Providers and parents brought their own judgments, perceptions, and measure of hope to relationships, when there was common ground for expressing, and having, hope, shared decision making was more productive and they developed more effective relationships and communication. Relationships between parents and providers were particularly influenced by and contributory to hope. Communication between parents and providers was also responsible for and responsive to hope.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母决策的十字路口:希望、沟通、关系和情感的交叉点。
出生时患有复杂的危及生命的慢性疾病(CLTC)的儿童的父母会经历一个不确定的轨迹,需要做出关键的决策。因此,本定性描述性研究探讨了家长和医疗服务提供者的希望如何影响决策和对先天性复杂危重慢性病患儿的护理。本研究分析了来自 46 名负责护理 11 名患有复杂先天性心脏病(CCHD)婴儿的个人(父母、护士、医生和执业护士)的 193 个访谈,以了解希望是如何在与沟通、关系和情绪相关的经历中影响决策的。总体而言,家长的希望依然强烈,并在家长的决策过程中发挥了关键作用。家长和专业医疗服务提供者表达了一系列情绪,这些情绪似乎与希望密切相关,并影响着决策。医疗服务提供者和家长在关系中都有自己的判断、看法和对希望的衡量标准,当他们在表达和拥有希望方面有共同点时,共同决策就会更有成效,他们也会建立更有效的关系和沟通。家长与托养者之间的关系尤其受到希望的影响,也是希望的促成因素。家长与托儿所之间的沟通也对希望有影响和促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Why are we still doing sucrose trials for newborns? Experiences of siblings and parents of children with congenital heart disease and exploration of siblings' support needs. Mothers' experience seeking healthcare advice for their unsettled infants in Victoria, Australia. Factors that support children and young people to express their views and to have them heard in healthcare: An inductive qualitative content analysis. Goals of Morbidity and Mortality meetings in paediatric acute care. A qualitative case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1