Emergency department crowding and older patients: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Q3 Medicine Acute Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.52964/AMJA.0938
B Schouten, H Merten, Mnt Kremers, M van Greuningen, C Wagner, Pwb Nanayakkara
{"title":"Emergency department crowding and older patients: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.","authors":"B Schouten,&nbsp;H Merten,&nbsp;Mnt Kremers,&nbsp;M van Greuningen,&nbsp;C Wagner,&nbsp;Pwb Nanayakkara","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem and one of the main causes internationally is an increase in presentations by older patients with complex and chronic care needs. Although there has been a 4,3% reduction in total ED visits from 2016-2019 in the Netherlands, the EDs still experience crowding. National crowding research has not focused on the older group in detail, hence their possible role remains ill defined. The primary aim of this study was to map the trend in ED visits by older patients in the Netherlands. The secondary aim was to identify healthcare utilization 30 days before/after ED visit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study, using longitudinal health insurance claims data (2016-2019). The data encompasses all Dutch patients of 70 years or older who visited the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of older patients who visited the ED followed by admission, increased from 231,223 patients (2016), to 234,817 (2019). The number without admission also increased from 244,814 patients, to 274,984. There were 696,005 total visits by older patients (2016) increasing to 730,358 visits (2019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The slight rise in older patients at the ED is consistent with overall population growth of older people in the Netherlands. These results indicate that Dutch ED crowding cannot be explained by mere numbers of older patients. More research is needed with data on patient level, to study other contributing factors, such as complexity of care needs within the ageing population.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":"22 2","pages":"72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem and one of the main causes internationally is an increase in presentations by older patients with complex and chronic care needs. Although there has been a 4,3% reduction in total ED visits from 2016-2019 in the Netherlands, the EDs still experience crowding. National crowding research has not focused on the older group in detail, hence their possible role remains ill defined. The primary aim of this study was to map the trend in ED visits by older patients in the Netherlands. The secondary aim was to identify healthcare utilization 30 days before/after ED visit.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study, using longitudinal health insurance claims data (2016-2019). The data encompasses all Dutch patients of 70 years or older who visited the ED.

Results: The number of older patients who visited the ED followed by admission, increased from 231,223 patients (2016), to 234,817 (2019). The number without admission also increased from 244,814 patients, to 274,984. There were 696,005 total visits by older patients (2016) increasing to 730,358 visits (2019).

Conclusion: The slight rise in older patients at the ED is consistent with overall population growth of older people in the Netherlands. These results indicate that Dutch ED crowding cannot be explained by mere numbers of older patients. More research is needed with data on patient level, to study other contributing factors, such as complexity of care needs within the ageing population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科拥挤与老年患者:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
目的:急诊科(ED)拥挤是一个世界性的问题,国际上的主要原因之一是有复杂和慢性护理需求的老年患者就诊的增加。尽管2016-2019年荷兰急诊科的总访问量减少了4.3%,但急诊科仍然很拥挤。国家拥挤研究并没有详细关注老年人群体,因此他们可能的作用仍然不明确。本研究的主要目的是绘制荷兰老年患者急诊科就诊趋势图。次要目的是确定急诊科就诊前后30天的医疗保健利用情况。方法:我们进行了一项全国性的回顾性队列研究,使用了2016-2019年的纵向健康保险索赔数据。数据涵盖了所有到急诊室就诊的70岁及以上的荷兰患者。结果:入院后到急诊室就诊的老年患者数量从2016年的231223例增加到2019年的234817例。未住院患者也从24万4814名增加到27万4984名。老年患者的总访问量从2016年的696005次增加到2019年的730358次。结论:老年患者在急诊科的轻微上升与荷兰老年人口的总体增长是一致的。这些结果表明,荷兰ED拥挤不能仅仅用老年患者的数量来解释。需要对患者层面的数据进行更多的研究,以研究其他影响因素,例如老龄化人口中护理需求的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine
Acute Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: These are usually commissioned by the editorial team in accordance with a cycle running over several years. Authors wishing to submit a review relevant to Acute Medicine are advised to contact the editor before writing this. Unsolicited review articles received for consideration may be included if the subject matter is considered of interest to the readership, provided the topic has not already been covered in a recent edition. Review articles are usually 3000-5000 words and may include tables, pictures and other figures as required for the text. Include 3 or 4 ‘key points’ summarising the main teaching messages.
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care ultrasound for the diagnosis of an atypical small bowel obstruction in a cannabis user: a case report. Editorial - Acute Medical Care: "Exit block". Improving Telemetry use in the Acute Assessment Unit. Point of Care Ultrasound Bladder Volume Calculation on the Acute Medical Unit. Evaluating dynamic patterns in mortality before and after reconfiguration of the Danish emergency healthcare system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1