A core competency framework for mental health peer supporters of older adults in a Chinese community: cross-culturally informed Delphi study.

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1192/bjb.2023.45
Edwin Lok Yan Wong, Jessie Ho-Yin Yau, Lesley Cai Yin Sze, Hotinpo Sky Kanagawa, Dara Kiu Yi Leung, Tianyin Liu, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum
{"title":"A core competency framework for mental health peer supporters of older adults in a Chinese community: cross-culturally informed Delphi study.","authors":"Edwin Lok Yan Wong, Jessie Ho-Yin Yau, Lesley Cai Yin Sze, Hotinpo Sky Kanagawa, Dara Kiu Yi Leung, Tianyin Liu, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2023.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>Non-Western literature on the core competencies of mental health peer supporters remains limited. Therefore, we used a three-round Delphi study with peer supporters, service users (i.e. someone using peer support services) and mental health professionals to develop a core competency framework for peer supporters in the Chinese context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final framework included 35 core competencies, the conceptual origins of which were local (14.3%), Western (20%) and both local and Western (65.7%). They were grouped into five categories in ascending peer supporter role specificity: (1) self-care and self-development, (2) general work ethics, (3) work with others, (4) work with service users and (5) peer support knowledge.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A culturally valid mental health peer support competency framework can minimise role confusion and refine training and practice guidelines. In a Chinese context, peer supporters were valued as generic support companions, whereas functions highlighted in the West, such as role modelling, were perceived as less critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"92-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10985733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and method: Non-Western literature on the core competencies of mental health peer supporters remains limited. Therefore, we used a three-round Delphi study with peer supporters, service users (i.e. someone using peer support services) and mental health professionals to develop a core competency framework for peer supporters in the Chinese context.

Results: The final framework included 35 core competencies, the conceptual origins of which were local (14.3%), Western (20%) and both local and Western (65.7%). They were grouped into five categories in ascending peer supporter role specificity: (1) self-care and self-development, (2) general work ethics, (3) work with others, (4) work with service users and (5) peer support knowledge.

Clinical implications: A culturally valid mental health peer support competency framework can minimise role confusion and refine training and practice guidelines. In a Chinese context, peer supporters were valued as generic support companions, whereas functions highlighted in the West, such as role modelling, were perceived as less critical.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国社区老年人心理健康同伴支持者的核心能力框架:跨文化德尔菲研究。
目的和方法:有关心理健康同伴支持者核心能力的非西方文献仍然有限。因此,我们与同伴支持者、服务使用者(即使用同伴支持服务的人)和精神卫生专业人员进行了三轮德尔菲研究,以制定中国背景下同伴支持者的核心能力框架:最终框架包括 35 项核心能力,其概念来源分别为本土(14.3%)、西方(20%)和本土与西方(65.7%)。这些能力按同伴支持者角色的特殊性由高到低分为五类:(1)自我保健和自我发展;(2)一般职业道德;(3)与他人合作;(4)与服务使用者合作;(5)同伴支持知识:临床启示:一个文化上有效的心理健康同伴支持能力框架可以最大限度地减少角色混乱,完善培训和实践指南。在中国背景下,同伴支持者被视为一般的支持伙伴,而西方所强调的功能,如榜样作用,则被认为不那么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Medical obituaries and compulsive reading. Interview with Dr Alastair Santhouse. Increasing research capacity in an academically isolated mental health trust. An investigation into the critical ingredients of Intensive support teams for adults with intellectual disabilities who display challenging behaviour - ADDENDUM. Bridging early life trauma to difficult-to-treat depression: scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1