Self-care management among children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus in Malaysia.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Child Health Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-08 DOI:10.1177/13674935231168911
Noor Shafina Mohd Nor, Azriyanti Anuar Zaini, Muhammad Yazid Jalaludin
{"title":"Self-care management among children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus in Malaysia.","authors":"Noor Shafina Mohd Nor, Azriyanti Anuar Zaini, Muhammad Yazid Jalaludin","doi":"10.1177/13674935231168911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to evaluate diabetes self-care among diabetic children and adolescents and compare with glycaemic control. Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) questionnaire was distributed to patients aged 10-18 years with types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) at paediatric diabetes clinics in Malaysia. Haemoglobin A1c levels were measured after questionnaire completion. A total of 106 patients completed the questionnaire with a mean age of 13.91 (± SD 2.48) years. Mean haemoglobin A1c and SDSCA score were 9.78 (± SD 2.43)% and 19.09 (± SD 5.81), respectively. Type 1 DM patients had significantly higher haemoglobin A1c (10.11 95% CI [9.62, 10.59] vs 8.38 95% CI [7.13, 9.62]). Total score was higher in type 1 DM although not statistically significant (19.32 95% CI [18.21, 20.43] vs 18.08 95% CI [14.28, 21.87]). Blood glucose testing score was significantly higher in type 1 DM (5.24 95% CI [4.82, 5.66] vs 3.50 95% CI [2.23, 4.77]). There was statistically significant negative correlation between score in diet subcategory and haemoglobin A1c. In conclusion, self-care activities among diabetic children and adolescents are still suboptimal. Self-care activities on blood glucose testing are significantly better in type 1 DM. Diet section correlated well with glycaemic control necessitating further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"804-814"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935231168911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate diabetes self-care among diabetic children and adolescents and compare with glycaemic control. Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) questionnaire was distributed to patients aged 10-18 years with types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) at paediatric diabetes clinics in Malaysia. Haemoglobin A1c levels were measured after questionnaire completion. A total of 106 patients completed the questionnaire with a mean age of 13.91 (± SD 2.48) years. Mean haemoglobin A1c and SDSCA score were 9.78 (± SD 2.43)% and 19.09 (± SD 5.81), respectively. Type 1 DM patients had significantly higher haemoglobin A1c (10.11 95% CI [9.62, 10.59] vs 8.38 95% CI [7.13, 9.62]). Total score was higher in type 1 DM although not statistically significant (19.32 95% CI [18.21, 20.43] vs 18.08 95% CI [14.28, 21.87]). Blood glucose testing score was significantly higher in type 1 DM (5.24 95% CI [4.82, 5.66] vs 3.50 95% CI [2.23, 4.77]). There was statistically significant negative correlation between score in diet subcategory and haemoglobin A1c. In conclusion, self-care activities among diabetic children and adolescents are still suboptimal. Self-care activities on blood glucose testing are significantly better in type 1 DM. Diet section correlated well with glycaemic control necessitating further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚儿童和青少年糖尿病患者的自我保健管理。
本研究旨在评估糖尿病儿童和青少年的糖尿病自我护理,并与血糖控制进行比较。糖尿病自我护理活动摘要(SDSCA)问卷在马来西亚儿科糖尿病诊所分发给10-18岁的1型和2型糖尿病(DM)患者。完成问卷调查后测量血红蛋白A1c水平。106例患者完成问卷调查,平均年龄13.91(±SD 2.48)岁。平均血红蛋白A1c和SDSCA评分分别为9.78(±SD 2.43)%和19.09(±SD 5.81) %。1型糖尿病患者的血红蛋白A1c显著升高(10.11 95% CI [9.62, 10.59] vs 8.38 95% CI[7.13, 9.62])。1型糖尿病患者的总得分较高,但无统计学意义(19.32 95% CI [18.21, 20.43] vs 18.08 95% CI[14.28, 21.87])。1型糖尿病患者血糖测试得分显著高于对照组(5.24 95% CI [4.82, 5.66] vs 3.50 95% CI[2.23, 4.77])。饮食亚类评分与糖化血红蛋白呈显著负相关。总之,糖尿病儿童和青少年的自我保健活动仍然不够理想。1型糖尿病患者的血糖自我护理活动明显改善,饮食部分与血糖控制有良好的相关性,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Interventions for improving treatment adherence in young people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): A systematic review of behaviour change theory and behaviour change techniques. "When I gave him the insulin injection, I felt the pain in my heart": Experiences of parents of young children with type 1 diabetes in an Arab country. Factors associated with transition readiness among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida in South Korea. Association between maternal socioeconomic status and breastfeeding: Results from the Japan environment and children's study. Pain assessment and treatment in hospitalized infants, children, and young people.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1