{"title":"Prism Adaptation Treatment for Right-Sided and Left-Sided Spatial Neglect: A Retrospective Case-Matched Study","authors":"Timothy J. Rich PhD, OTR/L , Marinos Pylarinos , Devan Parrott PhD , Peii Chen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the effectiveness of prism adaptation treatment (PAT) between patients with right- and left-sided spatial neglect (SN).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective case-matched design.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and facilities.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 118 participants were selected from a clinical dataset of 4256 patients from multiple facilities across the United States. Patients with right-sided SN (median age: 71.0 [63.5-78.5] years; 47.5% female; 84.8% stroke, 10.1% traumatic/nontraumatic brain injury) were matched 1:1 with patients with left-sided SN (median age: 70.0 [63.0-78.0] years; 49.2% female; 86.4% stroke, 11.8% traumatic/nontraumatic brain injury) based on age, neglect severity, overall functional ability at admission, and number of PAT sessions completed during their hospital stay.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Prism adaptation treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Primary outcomes were pre–post change on the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Secondary outcomes were whether the minimal clinically important difference was achieved for pre–post change on the FIM.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found greater KF-NAP gain for patients with right-sided SN than those with left-sided SN (<em>Z</em> = 2.38, <em>P</em>=.018). We found no differences between patients with right-sided and left-sided SN for Total FIM gain (<em>Z</em>=–0.204, <em>P</em>=.838), Motor FIM gain (Z=–0.331, <em>P</em>=.741), or Cognitive FIM gain (Z=–0.191, <em>P</em>=.849).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest PAT is a viable treatment for patients with right-sided SN just as it is for patients with left-sided SN. Therefore, we suggest prioritizing PAT within the inpatient rehabilitation setting as a treatment to improve SN symptoms regardless of brain lesion side.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/99/main.PMC10258371.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
To compare the effectiveness of prism adaptation treatment (PAT) between patients with right- and left-sided spatial neglect (SN).
Design
Retrospective case-matched design.
Setting
Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and facilities.
Participants
A total of 118 participants were selected from a clinical dataset of 4256 patients from multiple facilities across the United States. Patients with right-sided SN (median age: 71.0 [63.5-78.5] years; 47.5% female; 84.8% stroke, 10.1% traumatic/nontraumatic brain injury) were matched 1:1 with patients with left-sided SN (median age: 70.0 [63.0-78.0] years; 49.2% female; 86.4% stroke, 11.8% traumatic/nontraumatic brain injury) based on age, neglect severity, overall functional ability at admission, and number of PAT sessions completed during their hospital stay.
Intervention
Prism adaptation treatment.
Main Outcome Measures
Primary outcomes were pre–post change on the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Secondary outcomes were whether the minimal clinically important difference was achieved for pre–post change on the FIM.
Results
We found greater KF-NAP gain for patients with right-sided SN than those with left-sided SN (Z = 2.38, P=.018). We found no differences between patients with right-sided and left-sided SN for Total FIM gain (Z=–0.204, P=.838), Motor FIM gain (Z=–0.331, P=.741), or Cognitive FIM gain (Z=–0.191, P=.849).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest PAT is a viable treatment for patients with right-sided SN just as it is for patients with left-sided SN. Therefore, we suggest prioritizing PAT within the inpatient rehabilitation setting as a treatment to improve SN symptoms regardless of brain lesion side.