Usefulness of a 4-Grade Novel Mouthpiece Device for Increased Mouth Pressure Reproducing Artificial Difficulty in Breathing.

Q4 Medicine Kurume Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-25 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6834008
Akiko Yorita, Yoshihisa Tokunaga, Takashi Kinoshita, Akiyoshi Nakakura, Hanako Oda, Haruki Imaoka, Kazuko Matsunaga, Tatsuyuki Kakuma, Tomoaki Hoshino, Tomotaka Kawayama
{"title":"Usefulness of a 4-Grade Novel Mouthpiece Device for Increased Mouth Pressure Reproducing Artificial Difficulty in Breathing.","authors":"Akiko Yorita,&nbsp;Yoshihisa Tokunaga,&nbsp;Takashi Kinoshita,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Nakakura,&nbsp;Hanako Oda,&nbsp;Haruki Imaoka,&nbsp;Kazuko Matsunaga,&nbsp;Tatsuyuki Kakuma,&nbsp;Tomoaki Hoshino,&nbsp;Tomotaka Kawayama","doi":"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6834008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of a novel 4-grade mouthpiece device to reproduce difficulty in breathing was assessed in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized, crossover-controlled trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the device with increasing mouth pressure. The modified Borg (mBorg) scale values, respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz (R5), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) were assessed while using the device.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>The four grades of breathing difficulty device were tested in 32 healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-grade device linearly worsened the mBorg scale with increasing mouth pressure. The mean R5 (± standard deviation [SD]) with grade I, II, III, and IV devices were 5.6 ± 0.1, 10.3 ± 0.3, 21.5 ± 0.7, and 54.8 ± 2.0 kPa/L/s, respectively. The mean %FEV<sub>1</sub> predicted (± SD) were 83.6 ± 15.9% with grade I, 55.3 ± 11.8% with grade II, 32.0 ± 6.1% with grade III, and 15.3 ± 3.2% with the grade IV device. The mBorg scale was positively correlated with R5 (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001) and negatively with %FEV<sub>1</sub> predicted (r = -0.81, p < 0.0001). No severe adverse events were reported during the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that the novel device could effectively reproduce the semi-quantitative artificial difficulty in breathing safely and easily in healthy individuals. These devices could be helpful to understand the mechanisms of difficulty in breathing.</p>","PeriodicalId":39559,"journal":{"name":"Kurume Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"229-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurume Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6834008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of a novel 4-grade mouthpiece device to reproduce difficulty in breathing was assessed in healthy individuals.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized, crossover-controlled trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the device with increasing mouth pressure. The modified Borg (mBorg) scale values, respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz (R5), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were assessed while using the device.

Materials: The four grades of breathing difficulty device were tested in 32 healthy participants.

Results: The 4-grade device linearly worsened the mBorg scale with increasing mouth pressure. The mean R5 (± standard deviation [SD]) with grade I, II, III, and IV devices were 5.6 ± 0.1, 10.3 ± 0.3, 21.5 ± 0.7, and 54.8 ± 2.0 kPa/L/s, respectively. The mean %FEV1 predicted (± SD) were 83.6 ± 15.9% with grade I, 55.3 ± 11.8% with grade II, 32.0 ± 6.1% with grade III, and 15.3 ± 3.2% with the grade IV device. The mBorg scale was positively correlated with R5 (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001) and negatively with %FEV1 predicted (r = -0.81, p < 0.0001). No severe adverse events were reported during the trial.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that the novel device could effectively reproduce the semi-quantitative artificial difficulty in breathing safely and easily in healthy individuals. These devices could be helpful to understand the mechanisms of difficulty in breathing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种4级新型口腔装置的实用性,用于增加口腔压力,再现人工呼吸困难。
目的:评估一种新型4级牙套装置在健康个体中再现呼吸困难的情况。方法:采用双盲、随机、交叉对照试验,研究该装置对口腔压力升高的疗效和安全性。在使用该装置时,评估改良Borg(mBorg)量表值、5 Hz时的呼吸系统阻力(R5)和1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。材料:在32名健康参与者中测试了四个级别的呼吸困难装置。结果:4级装置随着口腔压力的增加,mBorg量表线性恶化。I、II、III和IV级装置的平均R5(±标准差[SD])分别为5.6±0.1、10.3±0.3、21.5±0.7和54.8±2.0 kPa/L/s。预测的平均FEV1%(±SD)在I级为83.6±15.9%,在II级为55.3±11.8%,在III级为32.0±6.1%,在IV级为15.3±3.2%。mBorg量表与R5呈正相关(r=0.79,p<0.0001),与预测的%FEV1呈负相关(r=-0.81,p<0.001)。试验期间未报告严重不良事件。结论:我们证明了这种新型装置可以有效地再现健康人安全、轻松的半定量人工呼吸困难。这些设备可能有助于理解呼吸困难的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kurume Medical Journal
Kurume Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
A Case of Sarcoid Reaction in Subcarinal Lymph Node in A Postoperative Breast Cancer Diagnosed by Thoracoscopic Biopsy. Comminuted Transverse Femoral Shaft Fractures Are at Risk for Nonunion. High Expression of NDRG1 is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma with Long-Term Observation. Histological Improvement of Hepatic Fibrosis of Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis after Prednisolone and Azathioprine Treatment in a Patient with Autoimmune Hepatitis. Surgical Treatment of Simultaneous Common Femoral and Profunda Femoris Artery Aneurysms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1