Evaluating the clinical effects of a dynamic shoulder orthosis.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000245
Claudia J W Haarman, Edsko E G Hekman, Herman van der Kooij, Johan S Rietman
{"title":"Evaluating the clinical effects of a dynamic shoulder orthosis.","authors":"Claudia J W Haarman, Edsko E G Hekman, Herman van der Kooij, Johan S Rietman","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder orthoses reduce the gravitational pull on the shoulder by providing an upward force to the arm, which can decrease shoulder pain caused by stress on the glenohumeral structures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this interventional study, the clinical effects of a recently developed dynamic shoulder orthosis were assessed in 10 patients with chronic shoulder pain. The shoulder orthosis provides an upward force to the arm with 2 elastic bands. These bands are arranged to statically balance the arm, such that the supportive force is always directed toward the glenohumeral joint and shoulder movements are not impeded.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Clinical effect study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population was provided with a dynamic shoulder orthosis for 2 weeks. In the week before the orthosis fitting, the participants had no intervention. The primary outcome measures were the mean shoulder pain scores before and during the intervention, and the distance between the humeral head and the acromion without and with orthosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultrasound evaluation showed that the shoulder orthosis resulted in a reduction of the distance between the acromion and humeral head at different levels of arm support. In addition, it was demonstrated that the mean shoulder pain scores (range 0-10) decreased from 3.6 to 3 (in rest) and from 5.3 to 4.2 (during activities) after 2 weeks of orthosis use. In general, patients were satisfied with the weight, safety, ease in adjusting, and effectiveness of the orthosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study show that the orthosis has the potential to reduce shoulder complaints in patients with chronic shoulder pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shoulder orthoses reduce the gravitational pull on the shoulder by providing an upward force to the arm, which can decrease shoulder pain caused by stress on the glenohumeral structures.

Objective: In this interventional study, the clinical effects of a recently developed dynamic shoulder orthosis were assessed in 10 patients with chronic shoulder pain. The shoulder orthosis provides an upward force to the arm with 2 elastic bands. These bands are arranged to statically balance the arm, such that the supportive force is always directed toward the glenohumeral joint and shoulder movements are not impeded.

Study design: Clinical effect study.

Methods: The study population was provided with a dynamic shoulder orthosis for 2 weeks. In the week before the orthosis fitting, the participants had no intervention. The primary outcome measures were the mean shoulder pain scores before and during the intervention, and the distance between the humeral head and the acromion without and with orthosis.

Results: Ultrasound evaluation showed that the shoulder orthosis resulted in a reduction of the distance between the acromion and humeral head at different levels of arm support. In addition, it was demonstrated that the mean shoulder pain scores (range 0-10) decreased from 3.6 to 3 (in rest) and from 5.3 to 4.2 (during activities) after 2 weeks of orthosis use. In general, patients were satisfied with the weight, safety, ease in adjusting, and effectiveness of the orthosis.

Conclusions: The results of this study show that the orthosis has the potential to reduce shoulder complaints in patients with chronic shoulder pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估动态肩部矫形器的临床效果。
背景:肩部矫形器通过向手臂提供向上的力量来减少肩部的重力牵拉,从而减轻因盂盂肱骨结构受力而引起的肩部疼痛:在这项干预性研究中,我们评估了最近开发的动态肩部矫形器对 10 名慢性肩痛患者的临床效果。肩部矫形器通过两条弹力带为手臂提供向上的力量。这些弹力带的布置可使手臂保持静态平衡,从而使支撑力始终指向盂肱关节,不妨碍肩部运动:研究设计:临床效果研究:方法:为研究对象提供为期两周的动态肩部矫形器。在安装矫形器前一周,参与者未接受任何干预。主要结果指标为干预前和干预期间的平均肩部疼痛评分,以及未佩戴和佩戴矫形器时肱骨头与肩峰之间的距离:结果:超声波评估显示,肩部矫形器可在不同的手臂支撑水平下减少肩峰与肱骨头之间的距离。此外,使用矫形器两周后,肩部疼痛的平均评分(0-10 分)从 3.6 分降至 3 分(休息时),从 5.3 分降至 4.2 分(活动时)。总体而言,患者对矫形器的重量、安全性、易调整性和有效性均表示满意:本研究结果表明,矫形器有可能减轻慢性肩痛患者的肩部不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
An environmental scan of limb loss rehabilitation centers across Canada. Design of a custom metamaterial insert for improved pressure distribution within transtibial prosthetic sockets. Effects of a low-cost prosthetic knee on amputee gait over uneven and even terrains. Time to successful outcome vs. treatment duration in cranial remolding orthosis treatment. Is biomechanical loading reduced in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation during fast-paced walking when using different ankle/foot prostheses? A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1