Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Ligation and Catheter Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1007/s00246-023-03199-6
Carl Tabb, Sanjeev Aggarwal, Monika Bajaj, Girija Natarajan
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Ligation and Catheter Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants.","authors":"Carl Tabb, Sanjeev Aggarwal, Monika Bajaj, Girija Natarajan","doi":"10.1007/s00246-023-03199-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the association, if any, between closure modality (surgical ligation SL vs. catheter CC) of a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), after failure of or contraindication to medical therapy, and immediate procedural complications, and post-procedure physiologic status in preterm (gestational age < 32 weeks) infants. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, data were accessed on infants < 32 weeks gestation, who underwent SL or CC of PDA, born from 2019-2021. The choice of modality was determined by parents, after they were provided information on both procedures. Our cohort (n = 112) included 36 (32.1%) infants who underwent SL while 76 (67.9%) underwent CC. The SL group of infants were significantly more immature at birth, younger on admission to the level IV NICU and received more mean (SD) surfactant doses than the CC group. Higher proportions of infants in the SL group had 5-min Apgar scores ≤ 5, seizures, severe intracranial hemorrhage and had received medical therapy for PDA. Both procedures were highly efficacious, with 1 unsuccessful device placement attempt and had low associated adverse events. Two (2.6%) infants had device migration 24 h after CC. SL was associated with a higher rate of immediate postoperative hypothermia whereas, in the CC group, mean airway pressure was significantly lower 48 h after, compared to before the procedure. SL and CC are comparable in short-term efficacy and safety for PDA closure. Long-term outcomes data are needed following both procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03199-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the association, if any, between closure modality (surgical ligation SL vs. catheter CC) of a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), after failure of or contraindication to medical therapy, and immediate procedural complications, and post-procedure physiologic status in preterm (gestational age < 32 weeks) infants. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, data were accessed on infants < 32 weeks gestation, who underwent SL or CC of PDA, born from 2019-2021. The choice of modality was determined by parents, after they were provided information on both procedures. Our cohort (n = 112) included 36 (32.1%) infants who underwent SL while 76 (67.9%) underwent CC. The SL group of infants were significantly more immature at birth, younger on admission to the level IV NICU and received more mean (SD) surfactant doses than the CC group. Higher proportions of infants in the SL group had 5-min Apgar scores ≤ 5, seizures, severe intracranial hemorrhage and had received medical therapy for PDA. Both procedures were highly efficacious, with 1 unsuccessful device placement attempt and had low associated adverse events. Two (2.6%) infants had device migration 24 h after CC. SL was associated with a higher rate of immediate postoperative hypothermia whereas, in the CC group, mean airway pressure was significantly lower 48 h after, compared to before the procedure. SL and CC are comparable in short-term efficacy and safety for PDA closure. Long-term outcomes data are needed following both procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产儿动脉导管未闭手术结扎和导管闭合的疗效比较
目的 评价在药物治疗失败或禁忌症后,对有血流动力学意义的动脉导管未闭(PDA)进行闭合的方式(手术结扎 SL 与导管 CC)与即刻手术并发症和早产儿(胎龄为 6 个月或以上)术后生理状态之间是否存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Four-Dimensional Flow MRI, Two-Dimensional Phase-Contrast MRI and Echocardiography in Transposition of the Great Arteries. A Challenging Interventional Procedure: Transcatheter Closure of Tubular Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Impact of Residual Lesion Severity on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Following Congenital Heart Surgery in Infancy and Childhood. Risk Stratification in Pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White: Practice Variation Among Pediatric Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists. Outcomes of Infant Supraventricular Tachycardia Management Without Medication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1