Zohaib Ahmed, Mona Hassan, Syeda Faiza Arif, Muhammad Aziz, Umair Iqbal, Ahmad Nawaz, Umer Farooq, Wade Lee Smith, Joyce Badal, Anas Renno, Toseef Javaid, Ali Nawras, Sammy Saab
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Treatment Options for the Prevention of Post-TIPS Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zohaib Ahmed, Mona Hassan, Syeda Faiza Arif, Muhammad Aziz, Umair Iqbal, Ahmad Nawaz, Umer Farooq, Wade Lee Smith, Joyce Badal, Anas Renno, Toseef Javaid, Ali Nawras, Sammy Saab","doi":"10.15403/jgld-4508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is often used in patients with cirrhosis to manage portal hypertension-related complications. Unfortunately, 35-50% of patients develop overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after TIPS. However, data on lactulose and rifaximin to prevent post-TIPS HE is limited. Therefore, we aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of multiple pharmacological regimens in the prevention of post-TIPS HE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy to identify reports of studies of rifaximin use on post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy was constructed using truncated keywords, phrases, and subject headings developed in Embase. This strategy was translated to MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection, with all searches performed on 10 February 2022. No publication date or language limits were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 72 studies, and 56 studies were screened after removing duplicates. Five studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three retrospective studies, met our inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. A total of 840 patients were included, with 65% male. Our meta- analysis did not find a statistically significant difference between lactulose vs placebo/no prophylaxis, nor rifaximin vs placebo/no prophylaxis, nor rifaximin plus lactulose vs placebo/no prophylaxis in the reduction of post-TIPS HE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rifaximin alone, lactulose alone, and rifaximin plus lactulose did not significantly reduce the development of post-TIPS HE. Based on the P-scores of the three treatment groups, the combination of rifaximin plus lactulose showed the most promising trend towards preventing post-TIPS HE. More studies, especially large RCTs, are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases","volume":"32 1","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-4508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is often used in patients with cirrhosis to manage portal hypertension-related complications. Unfortunately, 35-50% of patients develop overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after TIPS. However, data on lactulose and rifaximin to prevent post-TIPS HE is limited. Therefore, we aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of multiple pharmacological regimens in the prevention of post-TIPS HE.
Methods: A comprehensive search strategy to identify reports of studies of rifaximin use on post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy was constructed using truncated keywords, phrases, and subject headings developed in Embase. This strategy was translated to MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection, with all searches performed on 10 February 2022. No publication date or language limits were used.
Results: The initial search identified 72 studies, and 56 studies were screened after removing duplicates. Five studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three retrospective studies, met our inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. A total of 840 patients were included, with 65% male. Our meta- analysis did not find a statistically significant difference between lactulose vs placebo/no prophylaxis, nor rifaximin vs placebo/no prophylaxis, nor rifaximin plus lactulose vs placebo/no prophylaxis in the reduction of post-TIPS HE.
Conclusions: Rifaximin alone, lactulose alone, and rifaximin plus lactulose did not significantly reduce the development of post-TIPS HE. Based on the P-scores of the three treatment groups, the combination of rifaximin plus lactulose showed the most promising trend towards preventing post-TIPS HE. More studies, especially large RCTs, are warranted.
背景和目的:经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS)常用于肝硬化患者治疗门静脉高压相关并发症。不幸的是,35-50%的患者在TIPS后发展为显性肝性脑病(HE)。然而,关于乳果糖和利福昔明预防tips后HE的数据有限。因此,我们旨在进行一项网络荟萃分析,以调查多种药物方案在预防tips后HE中的功效。方法:利用Embase中开发的截断关键词、短语和主题标题,构建了一个综合搜索策略,以确定利福昔明用于tips后肝性脑病的研究报告。该策略被翻译到MEDLINE、Cochrane中央对照试验登记册和Web of Science核心集合,所有搜索于2022年2月10日进行。没有使用出版日期或语言限制。结果:最初的检索确定了72项研究,在删除重复项后筛选了56项研究。5项研究,2项随机对照试验(rct)和3项回顾性研究,符合我们的纳入标准,并被纳入最终分析。共纳入840例患者,其中65%为男性。我们的荟萃分析没有发现乳果糖与安慰剂/无预防、利福昔明与安慰剂/无预防、利福昔明加乳果糖与安慰剂/无预防在减少tips后HE方面有统计学上的显著差异。结论:利福昔明单用、乳果糖单用、利福昔明加乳果糖均不能显著降低tips后HE的发生。根据三个治疗组的p值,利福昔明加乳果糖联合治疗在预防tips后HE方面显示出最有希望的趋势。需要进行更多的研究,特别是大型随机对照试验。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases (formerly Romanian Journal of Gastroenterology) publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research, which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The field comprises prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal also publishes reviews, editorials and short communications on those specific topics. Case reports will be accepted if of great interest and well investigated.