Impact of the coronavirus pandemic on financial returns of smallholder coffee plantations in Lao PDR

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s10457-023-00808-4
Somvang Phimmavong, Tek Narayan Maraseni, Rodney J. Keenan, Chanhsamone Phongoudome, Boonthavy Douangphosy
{"title":"Impact of the coronavirus pandemic on financial returns of smallholder coffee plantations in Lao PDR","authors":"Somvang Phimmavong,&nbsp;Tek Narayan Maraseni,&nbsp;Rodney J. Keenan,&nbsp;Chanhsamone Phongoudome,&nbsp;Boonthavy Douangphosy","doi":"10.1007/s10457-023-00808-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laos is among the top twenty coffee producing country in the world—producing about 39,000 tonnes per year—and most of its production is currently exported to over 26 countries, contributing about 1.1% of the total export value or US$64.3 million in 2019 to Laos’ national economy. COVID-19 restrictions on trade and movement of people have largely impacted on coffee markets and production. As a strategic crop in Laos, it is supported by a range of policies and programs to generate greater benefits to both independent smallholder farmers and those involved in cooperatives, including support for agroforestry production models involving coffee and tree crops. However, studies of the profitability of different coffee agroforestry models are limited. This study compares financial returns from four most popular coffee agroforestry models in two coffee production provinces of Laos, before and during COVID-19 pandemic. The data were gathered from 20 farmers, five coffee traders and an integrated coffee processing company. These data were then triangulated with, and supplemented by, interviews with coffee exporters (<i>n</i> = 3) and key informants (<i>n</i> = 4). Financial indicators suggest that all four agroforestry models were profitable before COVID, but profits for cooperative growers were higher than for smallholders due to higher crop productivity and lower costs. Despite higher prices due to COVID restrictions, other factors reduced profitability of all four models and one smallholder model became unprofitable. The reasons for such differences and related policy implications are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"97 4","pages":"533 - 548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-023-00808-4.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-023-00808-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Laos is among the top twenty coffee producing country in the world—producing about 39,000 tonnes per year—and most of its production is currently exported to over 26 countries, contributing about 1.1% of the total export value or US$64.3 million in 2019 to Laos’ national economy. COVID-19 restrictions on trade and movement of people have largely impacted on coffee markets and production. As a strategic crop in Laos, it is supported by a range of policies and programs to generate greater benefits to both independent smallholder farmers and those involved in cooperatives, including support for agroforestry production models involving coffee and tree crops. However, studies of the profitability of different coffee agroforestry models are limited. This study compares financial returns from four most popular coffee agroforestry models in two coffee production provinces of Laos, before and during COVID-19 pandemic. The data were gathered from 20 farmers, five coffee traders and an integrated coffee processing company. These data were then triangulated with, and supplemented by, interviews with coffee exporters (n = 3) and key informants (n = 4). Financial indicators suggest that all four agroforestry models were profitable before COVID, but profits for cooperative growers were higher than for smallholders due to higher crop productivity and lower costs. Despite higher prices due to COVID restrictions, other factors reduced profitability of all four models and one smallholder model became unprofitable. The reasons for such differences and related policy implications are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状病毒疫情对老挝小农户咖啡种植园财务回报的影响
老挝是世界前二十大咖啡生产国之一,每年生产约39000吨咖啡,目前其大部分产品出口到26多个国家,约占出口总额的1.1%,2019年为老挝国民经济贡献了6430万美元。新冠肺炎对贸易和人员流动的限制在很大程度上影响了咖啡市场和生产。作为老挝的一种战略作物,它得到了一系列政策和计划的支持,为独立的小农户和合作社参与者带来了更大的利益,包括支持涉及咖啡和树木作物的农林生产模式。然而,对不同咖啡农林模式的盈利能力的研究有限。这项研究比较了新冠肺炎大流行之前和期间老挝两个咖啡生产省份四种最受欢迎的咖啡农林模式的财务回报。这些数据来自20名农民、5名咖啡贸易商和一家综合咖啡加工公司。然后对这些数据进行三角测量,并辅以对咖啡出口商的采访(n = 3) 以及关键线人(n = 4) 。财务指标表明,在新冠肺炎疫情之前,所有四种农林模式都是盈利的,但由于作物生产率较高和成本较低,合作种植者的利润高于小农户。尽管新冠疫情限制导致价格上涨,但其他因素降低了所有四种模式的盈利能力,一种小农户模式变得无利可图。讨论了产生这种差异的原因以及相关的政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Current trends in silvopastoral systems Correction: Botanical composition gradients in silvopastoral systems on temperate native grasslands of Uruguay Correction: Silvopastoral transitions in Latin America: toward diverse perennial systems Designing silvopastoral systems: a simulation model approach Silvopastoral systems as a strategy to attenuate the negative effects of heat stress on productivity of beef cows grazing natural grassland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1