Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mutual Help Group Participation for Substance Use Problems.

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Alcohol Research : Current Reviews Pub Date : 2021-03-11 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.35946/arcr.v41.1.03
Sarah E Zemore, Paul A Gilbert, Miguel Pinedo, Shiori Tsutsumi, Briana McGeough, Daniel L Dickerson
{"title":"Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mutual Help Group Participation for Substance Use Problems.","authors":"Sarah E Zemore, Paul A Gilbert, Miguel Pinedo, Shiori Tsutsumi, Briana McGeough, Daniel L Dickerson","doi":"10.35946/arcr.v41.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mutual help groups are a ubiquitous component of the substance abuse treatment system in the United States, showing demonstrated effectiveness as a treatment adjunct; so, it is paramount to understand whether they are as appealing to, and as effective for, racial or ethnic minority groups as they are for Whites. Nonetheless, no known comprehensive reviews have examined whether there are racial/ethnic disparities in mutual help group participation. Accordingly, this study comprehensively reviewed the U.S. literature on racial/ethnic disparities in mutual help participation among adults and adolescents with substance use disorder treatment need. The study identified 19 articles comparing mutual help participation across specific racial/ethnic minority groups and Whites, including eight national epidemiological studies and 11 treatment/community studies. Most compared Latinx and/or Black adults to White adults, and all but two analyzed 12-step participation, with others examining \"self-help\" attendance. Across studies, racial/ethnic comparisons yielded mostly null (<i>N</i> = 17) and mixed (<i>N</i> = 9) effects, though some findings were consistent with a racial/ethnic disparity (<i>N</i> = 6) or minority advantage (<i>N</i> = 3). Findings were weakly suggestive of disparities for Latinx populations (especially immigrants, women, and adolescents) as well as for Black women and adolescents. Overall, data were sparse, inconsistent, and dated, highlighting the need for additional studies in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":7736,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol Research : Current Reviews","volume":"41 1","pages":"03"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol Research : Current Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v41.1.03","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mutual help groups are a ubiquitous component of the substance abuse treatment system in the United States, showing demonstrated effectiveness as a treatment adjunct; so, it is paramount to understand whether they are as appealing to, and as effective for, racial or ethnic minority groups as they are for Whites. Nonetheless, no known comprehensive reviews have examined whether there are racial/ethnic disparities in mutual help group participation. Accordingly, this study comprehensively reviewed the U.S. literature on racial/ethnic disparities in mutual help participation among adults and adolescents with substance use disorder treatment need. The study identified 19 articles comparing mutual help participation across specific racial/ethnic minority groups and Whites, including eight national epidemiological studies and 11 treatment/community studies. Most compared Latinx and/or Black adults to White adults, and all but two analyzed 12-step participation, with others examining "self-help" attendance. Across studies, racial/ethnic comparisons yielded mostly null (N = 17) and mixed (N = 9) effects, though some findings were consistent with a racial/ethnic disparity (N = 6) or minority advantage (N = 3). Findings were weakly suggestive of disparities for Latinx populations (especially immigrants, women, and adolescents) as well as for Black women and adolescents. Overall, data were sparse, inconsistent, and dated, highlighting the need for additional studies in this area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物使用问题互助小组参与的种族差异。
互助小组是美国药物滥用治疗系统中无处不在的组成部分,作为一种辅助治疗显示出已证明的有效性;因此,最重要的是要了解它们对少数种族或族裔群体是否像对白人一样有吸引力,是否同样有效。然而,目前还没有一项综合性的研究考察了在互助小组的参与中是否存在种族/民族差异。因此,本研究全面回顾了美国文献中关于有物质使用障碍治疗需要的成年人和青少年在相互帮助参与方面的种族/民族差异。该研究确定了19篇文章,比较了特定种族/少数民族群体和白人的互助参与情况,其中包括8项国家流行病学研究和11项治疗/社区研究。大多数研究将拉丁裔和/或黑人成年人与白人成年人进行了比较,除两人外,其他研究都分析了12步的参与情况,还有一些研究的是“自助”参与情况。在所有研究中,种族/民族比较产生的影响大多为零(N = 17)和混合(N = 9),尽管一些研究结果与种族/民族差异(N = 6)或少数民族优势(N = 3)相一致。研究结果微弱地暗示了拉丁裔人群(特别是移民、妇女和青少年)以及黑人妇女和青少年的差异。总的来说,数据稀疏、不一致、过时,突出了在这一领域进行额外研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
1.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Alcohol Research: Current Reviews (ARCR) is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal published by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) at the National Institutes of Health. Starting from 2020, ARCR follows a continuous, rolling publication model, releasing one virtual issue per yearly volume. The journal offers free online access to its articles without subscription or pay-per-view fees. Readers can explore the content of the current volume, and past volumes are accessible in the journal's archive. ARCR's content, including previous titles, is indexed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Low to Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Narrative Review and Methodological Considerations. Reducing Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and the Incidence of FASD: Is the Past Prologue? Identifying Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Children Affected by It: A Review of Biomarkers and Screening Tools. Simultaneous Alcohol and Marijuana Use Among Young Adults: A Scoping Review of Prevalence, Patterns, Psychosocial Correlates, and Consequences. Alcohol and the Adolescent Brain: What We've Learned and Where the Data Are Taking Us.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1