Social determinants of health and cancer screening implementation and outcomes in the USA: a systematic review protocol.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2022-06-08 DOI:10.1186/s13643-022-01995-4
Ariella R Korn, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Meagan Pilar, Brittney Sandler, Prema Bhattacharjee, W Todd Moore, Ross C Brownson, Karen M Emmons, April Y Oh
{"title":"Social determinants of health and cancer screening implementation and outcomes in the USA: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Ariella R Korn, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Meagan Pilar, Brittney Sandler, Prema Bhattacharjee, W Todd Moore, Ross C Brownson, Karen M Emmons, April Y Oh","doi":"10.1186/s13643-022-01995-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving the delivery, uptake, and implementation of cancer screening to meet evidence-based recommendations is needed to reduce persistent cancer health disparities in the USA. Current national public health targets emphasize the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) on cancer screening. However, there remains a need to explicate these linkages, toward the goal of identifying and implementing effective interventions that target and address SDOH to reduce inequities in cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will conduct a systematic review of English language peer-reviewed original research articles published between 2010 and 2021 that describe observational (qualitative and quantitative) and intervention studies conducted in the USA. In alignment with Healthy People 2030, we will include studies of breast, cervical, colorectal, and/or lung cancer screening. Guided by multiple SDOH frameworks, we will broadly define SDOH by five domain areas: economic stability, education access and quality, healthcare access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community context. Following systematic literature searches in five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) and piloting of screening procedures, reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts for potential relevance. Reviewer pairs will then screen full text articles for eligibility criteria. We will extract data items from included articles, including study characteristics, cancer screening intervention information, and coding of SDOH constructs. We will assess study quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and synthesize our findings using narrative, descriptive statistics, tables, and figures. Our approach will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By completing this systematic review, we will summarize recent literature on SDOH and cancer screening, identify research gaps for inclusion of SDOH, and propose future opportunities for advancing equity in cancer screening by integrating SDOH as part of the implementation context to promote uptake, sustainability, and scale-up in the implementation of screening guidelines.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42021276582 .</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"11 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01995-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving the delivery, uptake, and implementation of cancer screening to meet evidence-based recommendations is needed to reduce persistent cancer health disparities in the USA. Current national public health targets emphasize the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) on cancer screening. However, there remains a need to explicate these linkages, toward the goal of identifying and implementing effective interventions that target and address SDOH to reduce inequities in cancer screening.

Methods: We will conduct a systematic review of English language peer-reviewed original research articles published between 2010 and 2021 that describe observational (qualitative and quantitative) and intervention studies conducted in the USA. In alignment with Healthy People 2030, we will include studies of breast, cervical, colorectal, and/or lung cancer screening. Guided by multiple SDOH frameworks, we will broadly define SDOH by five domain areas: economic stability, education access and quality, healthcare access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community context. Following systematic literature searches in five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) and piloting of screening procedures, reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts for potential relevance. Reviewer pairs will then screen full text articles for eligibility criteria. We will extract data items from included articles, including study characteristics, cancer screening intervention information, and coding of SDOH constructs. We will assess study quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and synthesize our findings using narrative, descriptive statistics, tables, and figures. Our approach will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations.

Discussion: By completing this systematic review, we will summarize recent literature on SDOH and cancer screening, identify research gaps for inclusion of SDOH, and propose future opportunities for advancing equity in cancer screening by integrating SDOH as part of the implementation context to promote uptake, sustainability, and scale-up in the implementation of screening guidelines.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021276582 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国健康的社会决定因素与癌症筛查的实施和结果:系统性审查协议。
背景:美国需要改进癌症筛查的提供、接受和实施,使其符合循证建议,以减少持续存在的癌症健康差异。当前的国家公共卫生目标强调健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)对癌症筛查的作用。然而,仍有必要阐明这些联系,以确定并实施针对和解决 SDOH 问题的有效干预措施,从而减少癌症筛查中的不公平现象:我们将对 2010 年至 2021 年间发表的英语同行评审原创研究文章进行系统性回顾,这些文章描述了在美国开展的观察性(定性和定量)和干预性研究。为与 "健康2030 "保持一致,我们将纳入有关乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和/或肺癌筛查的研究。在多种 SDOH 框架的指导下,我们将按五个领域广泛定义 SDOH:经济稳定性、教育机会和质量、医疗保健机会和质量、邻里和建筑环境以及社会和社区背景。在对五个数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane Library)进行系统的文献检索并试用筛选程序后,审稿人将独立筛选标题/摘要,以确定潜在的相关性。然后,一对审稿人将根据资格标准筛选全文。我们将从纳入的文章中提取数据项,包括研究特征、癌症筛查干预信息和 SDOH 构建的编码。我们将使用混合方法评估工具(Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool)对研究质量进行评估,并使用叙述、描述性统计、表格和图表对研究结果进行综合。我们的方法将遵循系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)的建议:通过完成本系统综述,我们将总结近期有关SDOH和癌症筛查的文献,确定纳入SDOH的研究缺口,并通过将SDOH作为实施背景的一部分,提出未来促进癌症筛查公平的机会,以促进筛查指南的吸收、可持续性和推广实施:系统综述注册:prospero crd42021276582 .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Study protocol for evaluating automation of systematic review processes with EPPI-Reviewer and Copilot 365 in updating the cataract evidence gap map. The magnitude of multimorbidity in childhood: a global systematic review. Knowledge of reproductive-age women about mother-to-child transmission of HIV and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of interventions for social isolation, loneliness, and social participation in older adults with hearing loss: results from a systematic review. The prevalence of panic disorder in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1