Exploring Chronic Pain and Pain Management Perspectives: Qualitative Pilot Analysis of Web-Based Health Community Posts.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.2196/41672
Claire Harter, Marina Ness, Aleah Goldin, Christine Lee, Christine Merenda, Anne Riberdy, Anindita Saha, Richardae Araojo, Michelle Tarver
{"title":"Exploring Chronic Pain and Pain Management Perspectives: Qualitative Pilot Analysis of Web-Based Health Community Posts.","authors":"Claire Harter,&nbsp;Marina Ness,&nbsp;Aleah Goldin,&nbsp;Christine Lee,&nbsp;Christine Merenda,&nbsp;Anne Riberdy,&nbsp;Anindita Saha,&nbsp;Richardae Araojo,&nbsp;Michelle Tarver","doi":"10.2196/41672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient perspectives are central to the US Food and Drug Administration's benefit-risk decision-making process in the evaluation of medical products. Traditional channels of communication may not be feasible for all patients and consumers. Social media websites have increasingly been recognized by researchers as a means to gain insights into patients' views about treatment and diagnostic options, the health care system, and their experiences living with their conditions. Consideration of multiple patient perspective data sources offers the Food and Drug Administration the opportunity to capture diverse patient voices and experiences with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study explores posts from a web-based patient platform to gain insights into the key challenges and barriers to treatment faced by patients with chronic pain and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research compiles and analyzes unstructured patient data to draw out the key themes. To extract relevant posts for this study, predefined keywords were identified. Harvested posts were published between January 1, 2017, and October 22, 2019, and had to include #ChronicPain and at least one other relevant disease tag, a relevant chronic pain management tag, or a chronic pain management tag for a treatment or activity specific to chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common topics discussed among persons living with chronic pain were related to disease burden, the need for support, advocacy, and proper diagnosis. Patients' discussions focused on the negative impact chronic pain had on their emotions, playing sports, or exercising, work and school, sleep, social life, and other activities of daily life. The 2 most frequently discussed treatments were opioids or narcotics and devices such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation machines and spinal cord stimulators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social listening data may provide valuable insights into patients' and caregivers' perspectives, preferences, and unmet needs, especially when conditions may be highly stigmatized.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/41672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient perspectives are central to the US Food and Drug Administration's benefit-risk decision-making process in the evaluation of medical products. Traditional channels of communication may not be feasible for all patients and consumers. Social media websites have increasingly been recognized by researchers as a means to gain insights into patients' views about treatment and diagnostic options, the health care system, and their experiences living with their conditions. Consideration of multiple patient perspective data sources offers the Food and Drug Administration the opportunity to capture diverse patient voices and experiences with chronic pain.

Objective: This pilot study explores posts from a web-based patient platform to gain insights into the key challenges and barriers to treatment faced by patients with chronic pain and their caregivers.

Methods: This research compiles and analyzes unstructured patient data to draw out the key themes. To extract relevant posts for this study, predefined keywords were identified. Harvested posts were published between January 1, 2017, and October 22, 2019, and had to include #ChronicPain and at least one other relevant disease tag, a relevant chronic pain management tag, or a chronic pain management tag for a treatment or activity specific to chronic pain.

Results: The most common topics discussed among persons living with chronic pain were related to disease burden, the need for support, advocacy, and proper diagnosis. Patients' discussions focused on the negative impact chronic pain had on their emotions, playing sports, or exercising, work and school, sleep, social life, and other activities of daily life. The 2 most frequently discussed treatments were opioids or narcotics and devices such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation machines and spinal cord stimulators.

Conclusions: Social listening data may provide valuable insights into patients' and caregivers' perspectives, preferences, and unmet needs, especially when conditions may be highly stigmatized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索慢性疼痛和疼痛管理的观点:基于网络的健康社区帖子的定性试点分析。
背景:患者 的观点是 美国食品和药物管理局在医疗产品评估中的利益-风险决策过程的核心。传统的沟通渠道可能并不适用于所有患者和消费者。研究人员越来越多地认识到,社交媒体网站是一种了解患者对治疗和诊断方案、医疗保健系统以及他们的生活经历的看法的手段。考虑到多种患者视角的数据来源,食品和药物管理局有机会捕捉不同的慢性疼痛患者的声音和经验。目的:本试点研究探讨了基于网络的患者平台上的帖子,以深入了解慢性疼痛患者及其护理人员面临的主要挑战和治疗障碍。方法:本研究对非结构化患者数据进行整理和分析,得出关键主题。为了提取与本研究相关的文章,我们识别了预定义的关键词。收集的帖子发布于2017年1月1日至2019年10月22日之间,并且必须包括#慢性疼痛和至少一个其他相关疾病标签,相关的慢性疼痛管理标签,或针对慢性疼痛的治疗或活动的慢性疼痛管理标签。结果:慢性疼痛患者最常讨论的话题是疾病负担、支持需求、倡导和正确诊断。患者讨论的重点是慢性疼痛对他们的情绪、运动或锻炼、工作和学习、睡眠、社交生活和其他日常生活活动的负面影响。最常讨论的两种治疗方法是阿片类药物或麻醉剂,以及经皮神经电刺激机和脊髓刺激器等设备。结论:社会倾听数据可以为患者和护理人员的观点、偏好和未满足的需求提供有价值的见解,特别是当病情可能高度污名化时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Natural Language Processing Methods in Reddit to Investigate Opioid Use: Scoping Review. Effects of COVID-19 Illness and Vaccination Infodemic Through Mobile Health, Social Media, and Electronic Media on the Attitudes of Caregivers and Health Care Providers in Pakistan: Qualitative Exploratory Study. Descriptions of Scientific Evidence and Uncertainty of Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in US News: Content Analysis Study. Ethical Considerations in Infodemic Management: Systematic Scoping Review. Large Language Models Can Enable Inductive Thematic Analysis of a Social Media Corpus in a Single Prompt: Human Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1