Utilizing pharmacogenetics when treating first episode psychosis.

Abstract

The parents of a 21-year-old man brought him to an emergency psychiatric clinic for disturbed behaviour. He displayed significant hallucinatory behaviour, prominent delusions of persecution involving “special forces” and notable disorganization of speech, and had experienced more than 8 months of sociooccupational dysfunction. Upon admission, neurologic examination was unremarkable and results of routine metabolic, endocrine, liver and renal screening were within normal limits. He met the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, with a first episode of untreated psychosis. He was prescribed 10 mg aripiprazole for 4 days, but quickly developed adverse effects with disabling extrapyramidal rigidity. He then was switched to 2 mg risperidone, but after 1 week, he presented hypersalivation and debilitating daytime sleepiness. Despite ongoing hallucinations and persecutory fears, he refused the options of clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine owing to concerns about weight gain, but he accepted haloperidol. He was put on 5 mg haloperidol, but he soon reported tremors, stiffness and a notable anhedonia. At this stage, we sought a cytochrome P450 (CYP450) genotype assay for 2C19 and 2D6. The patient was found to be a normal (extensive) metaboliser for 2C19 but a poor metaboliser (PM) for CYP2D6. Haloperidol, aripiprazole and risperidone are likely to be degraded too slowly in patients who are CYP2D6 PM, leading to treatment failure, and risperidone is likely to be too slowly converted to its active metabolite, leading to a greater risk of adverse effects. The patient consented to be switched to paliperidone, and a rapid antipsychotic response followed over the next 10 days. The patient was discharged on 6 mg/d paliperidone and had a score of 2 on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale of Severity at 6 months. Most antipsychotics are hepatically metabolized by several CYP450 enzymes, but some, like paliperidone or amisulpride, are less metabolized than others.1 In clinical practice, pharmacogenomic testing of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 is seldom done, likely because many prescribers do not consider genetic factors to be critical for treatment choice, dose titration or adverse effect reduction.2 The prevalence of PMs and ultra-rapid metabolizers (UM) is estimated to be less than 5% in Euro peans (with notable variations across other ethnicities4,5); preventive testing is deemed to have low yield in practice. Thus, the maximum daily doses recommended for antipsychotics are based on a genotype-weighted population equilibrium that ignores the clinical relevance of CYP2C19/CYP2D6 metab olizer categories. Nevertheless, several product labels offer dosing recommendations based on metabolizer status,2 and many commercial tests are now available to assist prescribers.5 Of relevance to the present case is a recent large retrospective observational study confirming the higher frequency of treatment failures in PMs.6 CYP2D6 PMs are 2–3 times more frequent than UMs among Euro peans,3 with a notable dose reduction for aripiprazole and risperidone often reported in PMs.6,7 In patients with a first episode of psych osis, where a good response to pharmacotherapy is expected in most cases, the presence of repeated treatment failures and/or higher sensitivity to adverse effects should incite clinicians to order pharmacogenetic testing. This is particularly true if there are no other factors that explain poor response (e.g., noncompliance, drug abuse) or high sensitivity to adverse effects (e.g., medications interfering with the CYP system, a phenomenon known as “phenoconversion”).8 In clinical practice, pharmacogenetic variations may not explain all of the variance in drug metabolism, and it is important that we consider sex,9 age, concomitant medications, renal/ hepatic status, lifestyle factors such as smoking, and weight when making antipsychotic prescribing decisions. Further, dosing and monitoring drug concentration may be more readily available and directly inform dose adjustments, complementing pharmacogenetic testing. Nevertheless, studies of real-world utility of pharmaco genetic testing indicate that certain subgroups, such as the most severely ill10 or those who are nonadherent to treatment,11 may have substantially greater odds of improvement when prescribing follows pharmacogenetics-based recommend ations. Regarding antipsychotics, prescribing guidelines have been developed only for CYP2D62 and CYP3A4,12 and the evidence for testing other variants13 has not yet been deemed sufficient to make more general recommendations. Increasing prescribers’ use of pharmacogenetic testing in psychosis programs, especially when facing inadequate treatment response, has the potential to improve remission rates and reduce overall adverse effects associated with antipsychotics in clinical practice.