Gain-of-function and origin of Covid19

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Presse Medicale Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lpm.2023.104167
Patrick Berche
{"title":"Gain-of-function and origin of Covid19","authors":"Patrick Berche","doi":"10.1016/j.lpm.2023.104167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>In nature, wild viruses adapted for transmission circulate in many animal species (bats, birds, primates…). Contamination of other animals, including humans, may occur by crossing of the species barrier. Genetic manipulations have been carried out on wild viruses to favor the species jumping and to increase of </span>viral virulence<span>. The aim was to identify the critical genes for pathogenicity. This has been mainly performed on potentially epidemic pathogens, as </span></span><em>Myxovirus influenzae</em><span><span> of avian flu and coronaviruses of SARS and </span>MERS epidemics. These dangerous experiments were subject to a moratorium in the United States (2014–2017). Three years after the emergence of Covid-19, the origin of du SARS-CoV2 remains a mystery. Covid19 appeared in Wuhan, officially in December 2019, but probably during the autumn 2019. The virus was identified in January 2020. It belongs to the genus </span><span><em>Betacoronavirus</em></span> (subgenus <em>Sarbecovirus</em><span><span><span>). It was at once highly contagious. In addition, the primary isolates were genetically very homogeneous, differing only by two nucleotides without evidence for adaptive mutations. In addition, the Spike protein, a major virulence factor, has a </span>furin site, not found in any other known sarbecovirus. Unlike the SARS and MERS epidemics, no intermediate host has been detected so far. Finally, no other outbreaks were reported at the beginning of the pandemic outside of Wuhan, contrary to what happened with the emergence of SARS (2002) and </span>H7N9<span> avian influenza (2013). Today, there are two scenarios to explain the emergence of SARS-CoV2. Proponents of the natural origin argue that the bat virus might have directly infected humans, spreading silently at a low level in humans for years, without eliminating the existence of undetected intermediate hosts. This does not explain the origin in Wuhan, far away from the natural virus reservoirs. The furin site would have arisen spontaneously from other coronaviruses. The alternative scenario is that of a laboratory accident after gain-of-function manipulations from a SARS-like virus, or even the occurrence of a human contamination by a natural CoV virus grown on cells in Wuhan.</span></span></p><p>This article is an update to the Quarterly Medical Review (QMR) devoted to the history of modern pandemics. To access this QMR contents, please go here: <span>https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/la-presse-medicale/vol/51/issue/3</span><svg><path></path></svg></p></div>","PeriodicalId":20530,"journal":{"name":"Presse Medicale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Presse Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0755498223000040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In nature, wild viruses adapted for transmission circulate in many animal species (bats, birds, primates…). Contamination of other animals, including humans, may occur by crossing of the species barrier. Genetic manipulations have been carried out on wild viruses to favor the species jumping and to increase of viral virulence. The aim was to identify the critical genes for pathogenicity. This has been mainly performed on potentially epidemic pathogens, as Myxovirus influenzae of avian flu and coronaviruses of SARS and MERS epidemics. These dangerous experiments were subject to a moratorium in the United States (2014–2017). Three years after the emergence of Covid-19, the origin of du SARS-CoV2 remains a mystery. Covid19 appeared in Wuhan, officially in December 2019, but probably during the autumn 2019. The virus was identified in January 2020. It belongs to the genus Betacoronavirus (subgenus Sarbecovirus). It was at once highly contagious. In addition, the primary isolates were genetically very homogeneous, differing only by two nucleotides without evidence for adaptive mutations. In addition, the Spike protein, a major virulence factor, has a furin site, not found in any other known sarbecovirus. Unlike the SARS and MERS epidemics, no intermediate host has been detected so far. Finally, no other outbreaks were reported at the beginning of the pandemic outside of Wuhan, contrary to what happened with the emergence of SARS (2002) and H7N9 avian influenza (2013). Today, there are two scenarios to explain the emergence of SARS-CoV2. Proponents of the natural origin argue that the bat virus might have directly infected humans, spreading silently at a low level in humans for years, without eliminating the existence of undetected intermediate hosts. This does not explain the origin in Wuhan, far away from the natural virus reservoirs. The furin site would have arisen spontaneously from other coronaviruses. The alternative scenario is that of a laboratory accident after gain-of-function manipulations from a SARS-like virus, or even the occurrence of a human contamination by a natural CoV virus grown on cells in Wuhan.

This article is an update to the Quarterly Medical Review (QMR) devoted to the history of modern pandemics. To access this QMR contents, please go here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/la-presse-medicale/vol/51/issue/3

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid19的功能获得和起源
在自然界中,适应传播的野生病毒在许多动物物种(蝙蝠、鸟类、灵长类动物…)中传播。跨越物种屏障可能会对包括人类在内的其他动物造成污染。已经对野生病毒进行了基因操作,以利于物种跳跃并增加病毒毒力。目的是鉴定致病性的关键基因。这主要针对潜在的流行病病原体,如禽流感的粘液病毒流感嗜血杆菌以及SARS和MERS流行病的冠状病毒。这些危险的实验在美国被暂停(2014-2017)。新冠肺炎出现三年后,du SARS-CoV2的起源仍然是个谜。2019冠状病毒病于2019年12月在武汉正式出现,但可能在2019年秋季。该病毒于2020年1月被发现。它属于Betacoronavirus属(Sarbecovirus亚属)。它的传染性很强。此外,原代分离株在基因上非常同源,仅相差两个核苷酸,没有适应性突变的证据。此外,刺突蛋白是一种主要的毒力因子,它有一个弗林蛋白位点,在任何其他已知的沙贝病毒中都没有发现。与SARS和MERS疫情不同,到目前为止还没有发现中间宿主。最后,与SARS(2002年)和H7N9禽流感(2013年)的出现相反,在疫情开始时,武汉以外没有其他疫情报告。今天,有两种情况可以解释严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的出现。自然起源的支持者认为,蝙蝠病毒可能直接感染了人类,多年来在人类中以低水平无声传播,而没有消除未被发现的中间宿主的存在。这并不能解释起源于远离天然病毒库的武汉。弗林位点可能是由其他冠状病毒自发产生的。另一种情况是,在SARS样病毒获得功能操作后发生实验室事故,甚至是武汉细胞上生长的天然冠状病毒污染人类。本文是《季度医学评论》(QMR)的更新,专门报道现代流行病的历史。要访问此QMR内容,请访问此处:https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/la-presse-medicale/vol/51/issue/3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Presse Medicale
Presse Medicale 医学-医学:内科
自引率
3.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Seule revue médicale "généraliste" de haut niveau, La Presse Médicale est l''équivalent francophone des grandes revues anglosaxonnes de publication et de formation continue. A raison d''un numéro par mois, La Presse Médicale vous offre une double approche éditoriale : - des publications originales (articles originaux, revues systématiques, cas cliniques) soumises à double expertise, portant sur les avancées médicales les plus récentes ; - une partie orientée vers la FMC, vous propose une mise à jour permanente et de haut niveau de vos connaissances, sous forme de dossiers thématiques et de mises au point dans les principales spécialités médicales, pour vous aider à optimiser votre formation.
期刊最新文献
Elderly Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: Insights from the RIETE Registry. Impact of thrombophilia on venous thromboembolism management. Diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism A tribute to Guy Meyer Advancing the management of acute intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism: The enduring legacy of Professor Guy Meyer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1