Decision Making and Cost in Healthcare: The Patient Perspective.

Sarah E Lindsay, Aaron Alokozai, Sara L Eppler, Jeffrey Yao, Arden Morris, Robin N Kamal
{"title":"Decision Making and Cost in Healthcare: The Patient Perspective.","authors":"Sarah E Lindsay,&nbsp;Aaron Alokozai,&nbsp;Sara L Eppler,&nbsp;Jeffrey Yao,&nbsp;Arden Morris,&nbsp;Robin N Kamal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unsustainable spending and unsatisfactory outcomes have prompted a reanalysis of healthcare policy towards value. Several strategies have been proposed as part of this effort including cost sharing plans to shift costs to patients and gain-sharing models to shift risk to health systems. The patient perspective is rarely elicited in policy formation despite efforts to increase patient-centered care. We conducted a prospective study of 118 patients presenting to hand clinic to assess patient perspective of who should constrain treatment options (patient, physician, insurance company, hospital) and be responsible for costs in scenarios of clinical equipoise. We found that patients believed that insurance companies and hospitals should not constrain which treatment options are available to a patient and that physicians and patients should together influence the availability of treatment options. Patients were willing to cost share with insurance companies when choosing more expensive treatments or in the setting of non-life-threatening diseases. In addressing rising healthcare costs, patient perspectives can inform policies designed to increase value. Asking patients to cost share when choosing a more expensive treatment option in the setting of clinical equipoise could be a strategy for health systems to increase value. Level of Evidence: III (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):023-027, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":17143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"32 1","pages":"23-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unsustainable spending and unsatisfactory outcomes have prompted a reanalysis of healthcare policy towards value. Several strategies have been proposed as part of this effort including cost sharing plans to shift costs to patients and gain-sharing models to shift risk to health systems. The patient perspective is rarely elicited in policy formation despite efforts to increase patient-centered care. We conducted a prospective study of 118 patients presenting to hand clinic to assess patient perspective of who should constrain treatment options (patient, physician, insurance company, hospital) and be responsible for costs in scenarios of clinical equipoise. We found that patients believed that insurance companies and hospitals should not constrain which treatment options are available to a patient and that physicians and patients should together influence the availability of treatment options. Patients were willing to cost share with insurance companies when choosing more expensive treatments or in the setting of non-life-threatening diseases. In addressing rising healthcare costs, patient perspectives can inform policies designed to increase value. Asking patients to cost share when choosing a more expensive treatment option in the setting of clinical equipoise could be a strategy for health systems to increase value. Level of Evidence: III (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):023-027, 2023).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健中的决策和成本:患者视角。
不可持续的支出和令人不满意的结果促使人们重新分析医疗保健政策的价值取向。作为这一努力的一部分,已经提出了若干战略,包括将费用转嫁给患者的费用分担计划和将风险转嫁给卫生系统的收益分担模式。尽管努力增加以患者为中心的护理,但在政策形成中很少引起患者的观点。我们对118名患者进行了前瞻性研究,以评估患者的观点,即谁应该限制治疗方案(患者、医生、保险公司、医院),并在临床平衡的情况下负责成本。我们发现,患者认为保险公司和医院不应该限制患者可获得的治疗方案,医生和患者应该共同影响治疗方案的可获得性。患者在选择更昂贵的治疗方法或不危及生命的疾病时,愿意与保险公司分担费用。在解决不断上升的医疗保健成本时,患者的观点可以为旨在增加价值的政策提供信息。在临床平衡的背景下,要求患者在选择更昂贵的治疗方案时分担费用,可能是卫生系统增加价值的一种策略。证据等级:III (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):023- 027,2023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is an Orthopaedic Surgery Resident's Previous Case Experience Associated with Success of Initial Treatment of Pediatric Forearm Fractures? A Barbed Proximal Femoral Nailing System for Isolated Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Operative Outcomes. Rare, Atypical Mycobacterium Infection of the Hand in Immunocompetent Individuals. A Regional Analysis of Hospital Readmissions Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and the Impact of Medicaid Expansion. A Sonography-based Decision Model for Use in Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1