Cost-effectiveness and productivity impacts of call-back telephone counselling for smoking cessation.

IF 2.5 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Research & Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.17061/phrp33232306
Paul Crosland, Michelle Scollo, Sarah L White, Nikki McCaffrey
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness and productivity impacts of call-back telephone counselling for smoking cessation.","authors":"Paul Crosland, Michelle Scollo, Sarah L White, Nikki McCaffrey","doi":"10.17061/phrp33232306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Few existing economic evaluations of telephone call-back services for smoking cessation (quitlines) include productivity measures. The Economics of Cancer Collaboration Tobacco Control (ECCTC) model was developed by adopting a societal perspective, including productivity impacts.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Economic simulation modelling Methods: A multi-health state Markov cohort microsimulation model was constructed. The population was the Victorian smoking population in 2018. The effectiveness of the Victorian Quitline was informed by an evaluation and compared with no service. Risks of developing disease for smokers and former smokers were obtained from the literature. The model calculated economic measures, including average and total costs and health effects; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; and net monetary benefit (NMB) for both the healthcare and societal perspective. An extensive uncertainty analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Quitline service is cost-effective and dominant from both healthcare and societal perspectives, reducing costs with greater health benefits compared with no service. The expected incremental NMB was $2912 per person from the healthcare perspective and $7398 from the societal perspective. Total cost savings were $869 035 of healthcare costs, $1.1 million for absenteeism, $21.8 million for lost workforce participation, and $8.4 million for premature mortality, with a total reduction in societal costs of $32.2 million, over the 80 year timeframe of the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a high degree of certainty in these results, and overall conclusions were robust to one-way sensitivity and scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Victorian Quitline service is cost-effective and should be retained and expanded where possible. The ECCTC model can be adapted to analyse the cost-effectiveness of other tobacco cessation interventions, populations and contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp33232306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Few existing economic evaluations of telephone call-back services for smoking cessation (quitlines) include productivity measures. The Economics of Cancer Collaboration Tobacco Control (ECCTC) model was developed by adopting a societal perspective, including productivity impacts.

Study type: Economic simulation modelling Methods: A multi-health state Markov cohort microsimulation model was constructed. The population was the Victorian smoking population in 2018. The effectiveness of the Victorian Quitline was informed by an evaluation and compared with no service. Risks of developing disease for smokers and former smokers were obtained from the literature. The model calculated economic measures, including average and total costs and health effects; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; and net monetary benefit (NMB) for both the healthcare and societal perspective. An extensive uncertainty analysis was conducted.

Results: The Quitline service is cost-effective and dominant from both healthcare and societal perspectives, reducing costs with greater health benefits compared with no service. The expected incremental NMB was $2912 per person from the healthcare perspective and $7398 from the societal perspective. Total cost savings were $869 035 of healthcare costs, $1.1 million for absenteeism, $21.8 million for lost workforce participation, and $8.4 million for premature mortality, with a total reduction in societal costs of $32.2 million, over the 80 year timeframe of the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a high degree of certainty in these results, and overall conclusions were robust to one-way sensitivity and scenario analyses.

Conclusions: The Victorian Quitline service is cost-effective and should be retained and expanded where possible. The ECCTC model can be adapted to analyse the cost-effectiveness of other tobacco cessation interventions, populations and contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回拨电话戒烟辅导对成本效益及生产力的影响。
目的:目前对戒烟电话回拨服务(戒烟热线)的经济评价很少包括生产力措施。通过采用包括生产力影响在内的社会视角,开发了癌症合作烟草控制(ECCTC)模型。研究类型:经济模拟建模方法:构建多健康状态马尔可夫队列微观模拟模型。这是2018年维多利亚州的吸烟人口。维多利亚戒烟热线的有效性是通过评估得出的,并与没有服务的情况进行了比较。吸烟者和已戒烟者的患病风险从文献中获得。该模型计算了经济措施,包括平均和总成本以及健康影响;增量成本效益比;以及医疗保健和社会角度的净货币效益(NMB)。进行了广泛的不确定性分析。结果:从医疗保健和社会的角度来看,戒烟热线服务具有成本效益和优势,与不提供服务相比,降低了成本,带来了更大的健康效益。从医疗保健角度来看,预期增量NMB为每人2912美元,从社会角度来看为7398美元。在该模型的80年时间框架内,总共节省了8.69 035万美元的医疗保健费用、110万美元的旷工费用、2 180万美元的劳动力参与率损失费用和840万美元的过早死亡费用,总共减少了3 220万美元的社会成本。概率敏感性分析表明,这些结果具有高度的确定性,总体结论对单向敏感性和情景分析是稳健的。结论:维多利亚戒烟热线服务具有成本效益,应在可能的情况下保留和扩大。ectc模型可用于分析其他戒烟干预措施、人群和环境的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' Quitline use and the Tackling Indigenous Smoking program. Co-designing policy with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: a protocol. Acceptability of an asymptomatic COVID-19 screening program for schools in Victoria, Australia: a qualitative study with caregivers from priority populations. UV arrows descend from above: lessons from a mass media campaign to improve sun protection behaviours among young adults. Are they the same? Disentangling the concepts of implementation science research and population scale-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1