Management of adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in acute pain

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bpa.2023.02.002
Sina Grape (Lecturer) , Kariem El-Boghdadly (Consultant, Honorary Senior Lecturer) , Eric Albrecht (Professor, Program Director of Regional Anaesthesia & Clinical Research)
{"title":"Management of adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in acute pain","authors":"Sina Grape (Lecturer) ,&nbsp;Kariem El-Boghdadly (Consultant, Honorary Senior Lecturer) ,&nbsp;Eric Albrecht (Professor, Program Director of Regional Anaesthesia & Clinical Research)","doi":"10.1016/j.bpa.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intrathecal opioids have been used for several decades in different clinical settings. They are easy to administer and provide many benefits in clinical practice, such as better quality of spinal anaesthesia, prolonged postoperative analgesia, decreased postoperative analgesic requirements and early mobilisation. Several lipophilic and hydrophilic opioids are available for intrathecal administration, either in combination with general anaesthesia or as adjuncts to local anaesthetics. Adverse effects after intrathecal lipophilic opioids administration are predominantly short-lived and benign. In contrast, intrathecal hydrophilic opioids may have potentially serious adverse effects, the most feared of which is respiratory depression. In this review, we will focus on the contemporary evidence regarding intrathecal hydrophilic opioids and present their adverse effects and how to manage them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48541,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","volume":"37 2","pages":"Pages 199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521689623000071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intrathecal opioids have been used for several decades in different clinical settings. They are easy to administer and provide many benefits in clinical practice, such as better quality of spinal anaesthesia, prolonged postoperative analgesia, decreased postoperative analgesic requirements and early mobilisation. Several lipophilic and hydrophilic opioids are available for intrathecal administration, either in combination with general anaesthesia or as adjuncts to local anaesthetics. Adverse effects after intrathecal lipophilic opioids administration are predominantly short-lived and benign. In contrast, intrathecal hydrophilic opioids may have potentially serious adverse effects, the most feared of which is respiratory depression. In this review, we will focus on the contemporary evidence regarding intrathecal hydrophilic opioids and present their adverse effects and how to manage them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞘内阿片类药物在急性疼痛中的不良反应处理
鞘内阿片类药物已经在不同的临床环境中使用了几十年。它们易于管理,并在临床实践中提供了许多好处,如更好的脊麻质量、延长术后镇痛时间、降低术后镇痛需求和早期动员。几种亲脂性和亲水性阿片类药物可用于鞘内给药,可与全身麻醉结合使用,也可作为局部麻醉剂的辅助药物。鞘内注射亲脂性阿片类药物后的不良反应主要是短暂和良性的。相比之下,鞘内注射亲水性阿片类药物可能会产生潜在的严重不良反应,其中最令人担忧的是呼吸抑制。在这篇综述中,我们将重点关注鞘内亲水性阿片类药物的当代证据,并介绍其不良反应以及如何处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Non-neuraxial labour analgesia Preeclampsia and eclampsia: Enhanced detection and treatment for morbidity reduction Initiation and maintenance of neuraxial labour analgesia: A narrative review Epidemiology, trends, and disparities in maternal mortality: A framework for obstetric anesthesiologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1