Early and Effective Diagnosis of Sepsis Using Flow Cytometry.

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Laboratory Physicians Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757722
Pratima Verma, Anurag Singh, Rashmi Kushwaha, Geeta Yadav, Shailendra P Verma, Uma S Singh, Himanshu D Reddy, Avinash Agarwal
{"title":"Early and Effective Diagnosis of Sepsis Using Flow Cytometry.","authors":"Pratima Verma,&nbsp;Anurag Singh,&nbsp;Rashmi Kushwaha,&nbsp;Geeta Yadav,&nbsp;Shailendra P Verma,&nbsp;Uma S Singh,&nbsp;Himanshu D Reddy,&nbsp;Avinash Agarwal","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  Sepsis is a major global health issue due to its high death and morbidity rates. To avoid the negative effects of sepsis and decrease mortality, it is vital to diagnose and treat it as soon as possible. Blood cultures can take up to 2 days to give result, and they are not always reliable. According to recent studies, neutrophil CD64 expression might be a sensitive and specific option for assessing sepsis. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a flow cytometry analysis for the expression of neutrophil CD64 in sepsis and its comparison with other standard tests in a tertiary care center. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Prospective analysis on 40 blood samples from suspected sepsis patients admitted to intensive care units with criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome on presentation was performed for expression of neutrophil CD64, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and complete blood count. Ten healthy volunteers were also enrolled in this prospective study. The laboratory results were compared in different groups. <b>Results</b>  The neutrophil CD64 had the highest diagnostic value to differentiate between patients of sepsis and nonsepsis groups with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.19-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 55.32-86.83%); specificity of 90.00% (95% CI: 59.58-99.49%) and 87.24% (95% CI: 66.69-99.61%); and likelihood ratio of 10.00 and 7.84, respectively. <b>Conclusion</b>  The neutrophil CD64 expression provides a more sensitive, specific, and novel marker for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","volume":"15 2","pages":"230-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/40/10-1055-s-0042-1757722.PMC10264123.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective  Sepsis is a major global health issue due to its high death and morbidity rates. To avoid the negative effects of sepsis and decrease mortality, it is vital to diagnose and treat it as soon as possible. Blood cultures can take up to 2 days to give result, and they are not always reliable. According to recent studies, neutrophil CD64 expression might be a sensitive and specific option for assessing sepsis. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a flow cytometry analysis for the expression of neutrophil CD64 in sepsis and its comparison with other standard tests in a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods  Prospective analysis on 40 blood samples from suspected sepsis patients admitted to intensive care units with criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome on presentation was performed for expression of neutrophil CD64, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and complete blood count. Ten healthy volunteers were also enrolled in this prospective study. The laboratory results were compared in different groups. Results  The neutrophil CD64 had the highest diagnostic value to differentiate between patients of sepsis and nonsepsis groups with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.19-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 55.32-86.83%); specificity of 90.00% (95% CI: 59.58-99.49%) and 87.24% (95% CI: 66.69-99.61%); and likelihood ratio of 10.00 and 7.84, respectively. Conclusion  The neutrophil CD64 expression provides a more sensitive, specific, and novel marker for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流式细胞术早期有效诊断脓毒症。
目的脓毒症因其高死亡率和发病率而成为全球主要的健康问题。为了避免败血症的负面影响,降低死亡率,尽早诊断和治疗至关重要。血培养可能需要2天才能得出结果,而且它们并不总是可靠的。根据最近的研究,中性粒细胞CD64表达可能是评估脓毒症的敏感和特异性选择。本研究旨在评估流式细胞术分析中性粒细胞CD64在脓毒症中的表达的诊断性能,并将其与三级保健中心的其他标准测试进行比较。材料与方法对重症监护病房收治的40例疑似脓毒症患者的血液样本进行前瞻性分析,检测中性粒细胞CD64、c反应蛋白、降钙素原和全血细胞计数的表达。10名健康志愿者也参加了这项前瞻性研究。比较各组实验结果。结果中性粒细胞CD64对脓毒症和非脓毒症患者的诊断价值最高,敏感性分别为100%(95%可信区间[CI]: 77.19-100%)和100% (95% CI: 55.32-86.83%);特异性分别为90.00% (95% CI: 59.58-99.49%)和87.24% (95% CI: 66.69-99.61%);和似然比分别为10.00和7.84。结论中性粒细胞CD64的表达为危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测提供了一种更加敏感、特异的新型标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Journal of Laboratory Physicians MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short term antibiotic effects on gut microbiome in Indian preschoolers: A 16S rRNA analysis Burkholderia vietnamiensis Causing Bacteremia in Patients Suffering from B-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Case Series and Review of Literature Predicting Outcome in Organophosphorus Poisoning Using RBC Cholinesterase and Serum Cholinesterase Values: A Hospital-based Longitudinal Study Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Critical Result Notification Protocol of Biochemistry Laboratory at a Tertiary Care Hospital In response to the article; “Salivary IgA as a Surrogate Biomarker for Microbial Infections in Postoperative Patients Receiving Chemo-Radio-Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer. J Lab Physicians. 2023;15(2):264-268”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1