Comparison of Tertiary Drug Information Resources With the CDC Guideline for Oxycodone Dosing: Are Patients at Risk?

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/87551225231164897
Allyson Ellsworth, Michael A Veronin
{"title":"Comparison of Tertiary Drug Information Resources With the CDC Guideline for Oxycodone Dosing: Are Patients at Risk?","authors":"Allyson Ellsworth,&nbsp;Michael A Veronin","doi":"10.1177/87551225231164897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Inappropriate prescribing of opioids is thought to play a central role in the ongoing opioid health crisis. Tertiary information resources are commonly used by clinicians for obtaining opioid dosing information. To assist health care providers in pain management, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed a guideline for prescribing opioids. <b>Objective:</b> To identify discrepancies for dosing information on oxycodone between commonly used tertiary drug information resources and the CDC Guideline. <b>Methods:</b> Searches of the tertiary drug information resources were conducted in the following order: Facts and Comparisons, Lexicomp, Medscape, and Micromedex. The term \"oxycodone\" was entered in the search box in the tertiary resources' applications. Drug information items retrieved were organized in tabular format. In the Google Chrome version 106.0.5249.119 search box, the term \"CDC guideline for opioid dosing\" was entered to retrieve current information on the CDC Guideline. <b>Results:</b> Searches produced drug information on oxycodone for available formulations, dosing regimens, recommended dosing, and maximum daily dose (MDD). Searches revealed discrepancies in dosing recommendations for oxycodone among tertiary drug resources and between tertiary drug resources and the CDC Guideline. <b>Conclusions:</b> When considering maximum daily dosing information for oxycodone from the selected tertiary drug information resources, the potential exists for patients to be at risk of addiction, overdose, and perhaps death. Improving the way opioids are prescribed through the CDC Clinical Practice Guideline can ensure patients have access to safer, more effective chronic pain treatment while reducing the number of people who misuse or overdose from inappropriate dosing information.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/5b/10.1177_87551225231164897.PMC10268045.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231164897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate prescribing of opioids is thought to play a central role in the ongoing opioid health crisis. Tertiary information resources are commonly used by clinicians for obtaining opioid dosing information. To assist health care providers in pain management, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed a guideline for prescribing opioids. Objective: To identify discrepancies for dosing information on oxycodone between commonly used tertiary drug information resources and the CDC Guideline. Methods: Searches of the tertiary drug information resources were conducted in the following order: Facts and Comparisons, Lexicomp, Medscape, and Micromedex. The term "oxycodone" was entered in the search box in the tertiary resources' applications. Drug information items retrieved were organized in tabular format. In the Google Chrome version 106.0.5249.119 search box, the term "CDC guideline for opioid dosing" was entered to retrieve current information on the CDC Guideline. Results: Searches produced drug information on oxycodone for available formulations, dosing regimens, recommended dosing, and maximum daily dose (MDD). Searches revealed discrepancies in dosing recommendations for oxycodone among tertiary drug resources and between tertiary drug resources and the CDC Guideline. Conclusions: When considering maximum daily dosing information for oxycodone from the selected tertiary drug information resources, the potential exists for patients to be at risk of addiction, overdose, and perhaps death. Improving the way opioids are prescribed through the CDC Clinical Practice Guideline can ensure patients have access to safer, more effective chronic pain treatment while reducing the number of people who misuse or overdose from inappropriate dosing information.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级药物信息资源与CDC羟考酮给药指南的比较:患者是否有风险?
背景:阿片类药物处方不当被认为在持续的阿片类药物健康危机中发挥核心作用。三级信息资源通常被临床医生用于获取阿片类药物给药信息。为了帮助医疗保健提供者进行疼痛管理,疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)制定了阿片类药物处方指南。目的:确定常用三级药物信息资源与CDC指南中羟考酮剂量信息的差异。方法:按照Facts and comparison、Lexicomp、Medscape、Micromedex的顺序进行三级药物信息资源检索。在三级资源应用程序的搜索框中输入“羟考酮”。检索到的药品信息项目以表格形式组织。在Google Chrome版本106.0.5249.119搜索框中,输入“CDC指南阿片类药物剂量”一词,检索CDC指南的当前信息。结果:搜索产生了羟考酮的药物信息,包括可用的配方、给药方案、推荐给药和最大日剂量(MDD)。搜索结果显示,三级药物资源之间以及三级药物资源与CDC指南之间的羟考酮剂量建议存在差异。结论:当考虑从选定的三级药物信息资源中获得的羟考酮的最大日剂量信息时,可能存在患者成瘾、过量用药甚至死亡的风险。通过CDC临床实践指南改进阿片类药物的处方方式,可以确保患者获得更安全、更有效的慢性疼痛治疗,同时减少因不适当的剂量信息而误用或过量使用阿片类药物的人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Implementation and Evaluation of APOTECAchemo in a Community Cancer Center: A Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Manual Antineoplastic Preparation. Implementation of Computerized Prescriber Order Entry Systems: A Review of Impacts, Barriers, and Facilitators. Adverse Effects Associated With Multimodal Analgesic Regimens in Critically Ill, Nonintubated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With Sepsis Before and After Implementation of a Sepsis Care Improvement Initiative at a Community Hospital. Potential Sampling Errors in Stability Studies Due to Dead Volume in Closed System Transfer Devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1