The APISS Questionnaire: A New Tool to Assess the Epidemiology of Systemic Allergic Reactions to Bee Venom in Beekeepers.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2023-0019
Tanja Carli, Mitja Košnik, Lijana Zaletel Kragelj, Genc Burazeri, Andreja Kukec
{"title":"The APISS Questionnaire: A New Tool to Assess the Epidemiology of Systemic Allergic Reactions to Bee Venom in Beekeepers.","authors":"Tanja Carli, Mitja Košnik, Lijana Zaletel Kragelj, Genc Burazeri, Andreja Kukec","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim To develop and validate a comprehensive questionnaire to be used as an instrument in cross-sectional studies among beekeepers. Methods A comprehensive questionnaire in Slovenian was validated by an expert panel (n=13) for content relevance and a rater panel (n=14) for clarity and comprehensibility. The content validity indices (an item-level content validity index and scale-level content validity index based on the average and universal agreement method) and item-level face validity index were calculated in accordance with the recommended number of both the review panels with their implications on the acceptable cut-off scores. Piloting was performed in a sample (n=50) of the target population (N=1.080) using telephone interviews. Results The item-level content validity index and scale-level content validity index based on the average method exhibited excellent content validity (0.97), while the scale-level content validity index based on the universal agreement method reached a value of 0.72. The item-level face validity index of 1.00 indicated that all items were clear and comprehensive. Conclusions The new instrument may be considered valid and feasible for use in nationwide population-based studies among Slovenian beekeepers and eventually in other populations.","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":"62 3","pages":"137-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/3f/sjph-62-3-sjph-2023-0019.PMC10263370.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aim To develop and validate a comprehensive questionnaire to be used as an instrument in cross-sectional studies among beekeepers. Methods A comprehensive questionnaire in Slovenian was validated by an expert panel (n=13) for content relevance and a rater panel (n=14) for clarity and comprehensibility. The content validity indices (an item-level content validity index and scale-level content validity index based on the average and universal agreement method) and item-level face validity index were calculated in accordance with the recommended number of both the review panels with their implications on the acceptable cut-off scores. Piloting was performed in a sample (n=50) of the target population (N=1.080) using telephone interviews. Results The item-level content validity index and scale-level content validity index based on the average method exhibited excellent content validity (0.97), while the scale-level content validity index based on the universal agreement method reached a value of 0.72. The item-level face validity index of 1.00 indicated that all items were clear and comprehensive. Conclusions The new instrument may be considered valid and feasible for use in nationwide population-based studies among Slovenian beekeepers and eventually in other populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
APISS问卷:一种评估养蜂人对蜂毒系统性过敏反应流行病学的新工具。
目的:开发和验证一份全面的调查问卷,作为养蜂人横断面研究的工具。方法:通过专家小组(n=13)对内容相关性进行验证,并通过评比小组(n=14)对清晰度和可理解性进行验证。内容效度指数(基于平均和普遍同意法的项目级内容效度指数和量表级内容效度指数)和项目级面部效度指数根据两个审查小组的推荐数字及其对可接受的截止分数的影响计算。采用电话访谈的方式在目标人群(n= 1.080)的样本(n=50)中进行试点。结果:基于平均法的项目级内容效度指标和量表级内容效度指标均表现出优异的内容效度(0.97),而基于普遍共识法的量表级内容效度指标达到了0.72。项目层面的面效度指数为1.00,表明所有项目都清晰全面。结论:新仪器可能被认为是有效和可行的,可用于斯洛文尼亚养蜂人的全国性种群研究,并最终用于其他种群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cancer Risk Factors Awareness in Slovenian Adolescents. Epidemiology and Risk Factor Analysis of Systemic Allergic Reaction to Bee Venom in the Slovenian Population of Beekeepers. Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices. Factors Associated with Low Back Overuse Injuries in Sports Science Students - A Prospective Study. Patients' Experience with Received Healthcare in Internal Medicine and Surgery Wards of Slovenian Hospitals-A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1