New Challenges in Scientific Publications: Referencing, Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2023-0015
Igor Švab, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš, Saša Zupanič
{"title":"New Challenges in Scientific Publications: Referencing, Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT.","authors":"Igor Švab,&nbsp;Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš,&nbsp;Saša Zupanič","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in scientific publications, some of which have bypassed the usual peer-review processes, leading to an increase in unsupported claims being referenced. Therefore, the need for references in scientific articles is increasingly being questioned. The practice of relying solely on quantitative measures, such as impact factor, is also considered inadequate by many experts. This can lead to researchers choosing research ideas that are likely to generate favourable metrics instead of interesting and important topics. Evaluating the quality and scientific value of articles requires a rethinking of current approaches, with a move away from purely quantitative methods. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools are making scientific writing easier and less time-consuming, which is likely to further increase the number of scientific publications, potentially leading to higher quality articles. AI tools for searching, analysing, synthesizing, evaluating and writing scientific literature are increasingly being developed. These tools deeply analyse the content of articles, consider their scientific impact, and prioritize the retrieved literature based on this information, presenting it in simple visual graphs. They also help authors to quickly and easily analyse and synthesize knowledge from the literature, prepare summaries of key information, aid in organizing references, and improve manuscript language. The language model ChatGPT has already greatly changed the way people communicate with computers, bringing it closer to human communication. However, while AI tools are helpful, they must be used carefully and ethically. In summary, AI has already changed the way we write articles, and its use in scientific publishing will continue to enhance and streamline the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":"62 3","pages":"109-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/f5/sjph-62-3-sjph-2023-0015.PMC10263368.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in scientific publications, some of which have bypassed the usual peer-review processes, leading to an increase in unsupported claims being referenced. Therefore, the need for references in scientific articles is increasingly being questioned. The practice of relying solely on quantitative measures, such as impact factor, is also considered inadequate by many experts. This can lead to researchers choosing research ideas that are likely to generate favourable metrics instead of interesting and important topics. Evaluating the quality and scientific value of articles requires a rethinking of current approaches, with a move away from purely quantitative methods. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools are making scientific writing easier and less time-consuming, which is likely to further increase the number of scientific publications, potentially leading to higher quality articles. AI tools for searching, analysing, synthesizing, evaluating and writing scientific literature are increasingly being developed. These tools deeply analyse the content of articles, consider their scientific impact, and prioritize the retrieved literature based on this information, presenting it in simple visual graphs. They also help authors to quickly and easily analyse and synthesize knowledge from the literature, prepare summaries of key information, aid in organizing references, and improve manuscript language. The language model ChatGPT has already greatly changed the way people communicate with computers, bringing it closer to human communication. However, while AI tools are helpful, they must be used carefully and ethically. In summary, AI has already changed the way we write articles, and its use in scientific publishing will continue to enhance and streamline the process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学出版物的新挑战:引用、人工智能和ChatGPT。
2019冠状病毒病大流行导致科学出版物激增,其中一些出版物绕过了通常的同行评审程序,导致未经证实的主张被引用的数量增加。因此,科学文章中是否需要参考文献越来越受到质疑。许多专家也认为,仅仅依靠影响因子等定量指标的做法是不够的。这可能导致研究人员选择可能产生有利指标的研究思路,而不是有趣和重要的主题。评估文章的质量和科学价值需要重新思考当前的方法,远离纯粹的定量方法。基于人工智能(AI)的工具正在使科学写作变得更容易、更省时,这可能会进一步增加科学出版物的数量,从而有可能产生更高质量的文章。用于搜索、分析、综合、评估和撰写科学文献的人工智能工具正在日益发展。这些工具深入分析文章的内容,考虑其科学影响,并根据这些信息对检索文献进行优先排序,并以简单的可视化图表呈现。他们还帮助作者快速,轻松地分析和综合文献中的知识,准备关键信息的摘要,帮助组织参考文献,并改善手稿语言。语言模型ChatGPT已经极大地改变了人们与计算机交流的方式,使其更接近人类交流。然而,尽管人工智能工具很有帮助,但它们必须谨慎且合乎道德地使用。总之,人工智能已经改变了我们写文章的方式,它在科学出版中的应用将继续加强和简化这一过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Monitoring the Effect of Vaccination on Mumps Cases Complications in the Czech Republic - Surveillance Data 2013-2022. Smokers' Characteristics Associated with Successful Smoking Cessation Undergoing Pharmacotherapy in Slovenia. Stigmatising Attitudes Towards Mental Health Conditions Among Medical Students In Five South-Eastern European Countries. The Evolution and Challenges of Academic Family Medicine: Insights from the Banja Luka Declaration. The Results of the "My Challenge" Camp in Addressing Childhood Obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1