Policy Decisionmaking in Long-Term Care: Lessons from Infection Control During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2023-06-01
Lori Frank, Thomas W Concannon, Jordan M Harrison, Sarah Zelazny
{"title":"Policy Decisionmaking in Long-Term Care: Lessons from Infection Control During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Lori Frank,&nbsp;Thomas W Concannon,&nbsp;Jordan M Harrison,&nbsp;Sarah Zelazny","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic focused attention on long-term care facilities' need for infection-control policies that balanced community safety and individual well-being. Infection-control policies were often developed, implemented, and mandated without the input or involvement of those who are most affected: residents and their family members, administrators, and staff. This failure led to declines in residents' physical and mental health. The pandemic exposed an opportunity-and an imperative-to reimagine long-term care in a way that is centered on the needs and preferences of those who receive care, their family members, and those who provide care. This study lays the groundwork for cultural change and a move toward inclusive policy decisionmaking in long-term care through a review of infection-control policy decisions and action items proposed in guided discussions with a diversity of stakeholders-long-term care residents, direct care staff, and consumer advocates to facility administrators, clinicians, researchers, and industry organizations. Transforming the culture of long-term care to elevate the needs of residents will require attention to facility leadership, along with steps to increase inclusiveness, transparency, and accountability in decisionmaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"10 3","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic focused attention on long-term care facilities' need for infection-control policies that balanced community safety and individual well-being. Infection-control policies were often developed, implemented, and mandated without the input or involvement of those who are most affected: residents and their family members, administrators, and staff. This failure led to declines in residents' physical and mental health. The pandemic exposed an opportunity-and an imperative-to reimagine long-term care in a way that is centered on the needs and preferences of those who receive care, their family members, and those who provide care. This study lays the groundwork for cultural change and a move toward inclusive policy decisionmaking in long-term care through a review of infection-control policy decisions and action items proposed in guided discussions with a diversity of stakeholders-long-term care residents, direct care staff, and consumer advocates to facility administrators, clinicians, researchers, and industry organizations. Transforming the culture of long-term care to elevate the needs of residents will require attention to facility leadership, along with steps to increase inclusiveness, transparency, and accountability in decisionmaking.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期护理中的政策决策:COVID-19大流行期间感染控制的经验教训。
COVID-19大流行将注意力集中在长期护理机构对平衡社区安全和个人福祉的感染控制政策的需求上。感染控制政策的制定、实施和授权往往没有受影响最严重的人群(居民及其家庭成员、管理人员和工作人员)的投入或参与。这一失败导致居民身心健康状况下降。这次大流行为重新构想长期护理提供了机会——也是势在必行——以接受护理者、其家庭成员和提供护理者的需求和偏好为中心。本研究通过对感染控制政策决策和行动项目的回顾,为文化变革奠定了基础,并在长期护理中朝着包容性政策决策的方向发展,这些政策决策和行动项目是在与各种利益相关者(长期护理居民、直接护理人员、消费者权益倡导者、设施管理者、临床医生、研究人员和行业组织的指导讨论中提出的。改变长期护理文化以提高居民的需求将需要关注机构领导,同时采取措施增加决策的包容性、透明度和问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Annual Trends Among the Unsheltered in Three Los Angeles Neighborhoods: The Los Angeles Longitudinal Enumeration and Demographic Survey (LA LEADS) 2023 Annual Report. America's Military and Veteran Caregivers: Hidden Heroes Emerging from the Shadows. Health and Social Services During Heat Events: Demand for Services in Los Angeles County. Perspectives of America's Military and Veteran Caregivers: A Qualitative Exploration. Process Evaluation of the Los Angeles County Rapid Diversion Program: A Pretrial Mental Health Diversion Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1