Sexual Assault Experiences in the Active-Component Army: Variation by Year, Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Installation Risk Level.

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2023-06-01
Avery Calkins, Matthew Cefalu, Terry L Schell, Linda Cottrell, Sarah O Meadows, Rebecca L Collins
{"title":"Sexual Assault Experiences in the Active-Component Army: Variation by Year, Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Installation Risk Level.","authors":"Avery Calkins,&nbsp;Matthew Cefalu,&nbsp;Terry L Schell,&nbsp;Linda Cottrell,&nbsp;Sarah O Meadows,&nbsp;Rebecca L Collins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better understand the circumstances surrounding sexual assault in the Army, RAND Arroyo Center researchers created descriptions of active-component soldiers' most serious sexual assault experiences using data from the 2016 and 2018 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members. In this study, researchers describe the most common types of behaviors that occurred, characteristics of alleged perpetrators, and times and places in which the experiences occurred. They also explore differences by gender, sexual orientation, and installation risk level. Nearly 90 percent of victims believed that the assault was committed for a sexual reason, and more than half indicated that the assault was meant to be abusive or humiliating. The typical perpetrator of victims' most serious sexual assault experiences was a male enlisted member of the military acting alone. Perpetrators were most often a military peer of the victim; perpetrators who were strangers to the victim were uncommon; and assaults by spouses, significant others, or family members were comparatively rare. Approximately two-thirds of victims' most serious experience of sexual assault occurred at a military installation. The authors found substantial differences by gender, especially in terms of the types of sexual assault behaviors victims experienced and in terms of the setting in which victims were sexually assaulted. The authors also found some evidence suggesting that sexual minorities-that is, individuals who identify with a sexual orientation other than heterosexual-may experience more-violent sexual assaults and more assaults that are meant to abuse, humiliate, haze, or bully, especially among men.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"10 3","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To better understand the circumstances surrounding sexual assault in the Army, RAND Arroyo Center researchers created descriptions of active-component soldiers' most serious sexual assault experiences using data from the 2016 and 2018 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members. In this study, researchers describe the most common types of behaviors that occurred, characteristics of alleged perpetrators, and times and places in which the experiences occurred. They also explore differences by gender, sexual orientation, and installation risk level. Nearly 90 percent of victims believed that the assault was committed for a sexual reason, and more than half indicated that the assault was meant to be abusive or humiliating. The typical perpetrator of victims' most serious sexual assault experiences was a male enlisted member of the military acting alone. Perpetrators were most often a military peer of the victim; perpetrators who were strangers to the victim were uncommon; and assaults by spouses, significant others, or family members were comparatively rare. Approximately two-thirds of victims' most serious experience of sexual assault occurred at a military installation. The authors found substantial differences by gender, especially in terms of the types of sexual assault behaviors victims experienced and in terms of the setting in which victims were sexually assaulted. The authors also found some evidence suggesting that sexual minorities-that is, individuals who identify with a sexual orientation other than heterosexual-may experience more-violent sexual assaults and more assaults that are meant to abuse, humiliate, haze, or bully, especially among men.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现役军人的性侵犯经历:不同年份、性别、性取向和安装风险等级的变化。
为了更好地了解陆军性侵犯的情况,兰德阿罗约中心的研究人员利用2016年和2018年现役军人工作场所和性别关系调查的数据,对现役士兵最严重的性侵犯经历进行了描述。在这项研究中,研究人员描述了发生的最常见的行为类型,被指控的肇事者的特征,以及发生这些经历的时间和地点。他们还探讨了性别、性取向和安装风险级别的差异。近90%的受害者认为性侵犯是出于性原因,超过一半的人表示性侵犯是为了虐待或羞辱。对受害者造成最严重性侵犯的典型犯罪者是一名单独行动的男性士兵。施暴者通常是受害者的战友;行凶者与受害者素不相识的人并不多见;配偶、重要他人或家庭成员的攻击相对较少。大约三分之二的受害者最严重的性侵犯经历发生在军事设施。作者发现,性别差异很大,特别是在受害者所经历的性侵犯行为类型和受害者遭受性侵犯的环境方面。作者还发现了一些证据,表明性少数群体——即认同非异性恋性取向的个体——可能会经历更暴力的性侵犯,以及更多意在虐待、羞辱、迷惑或欺凌的性侵犯,尤其是在男性中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Society Needs to Know How We Feel": Understanding Anti-Asian Hate Experiences and Service Barriers Among Chinese Older Adults in Los Angeles County, California. Assessing Readiness in Service Members Who Receive Private-Sector Behavioral Health Care. Cost Trade-Offs Between Accessing and Retaining Uniformed Mental Health Providers. Estimating the Effects of Further Expanding Health Insurance Coverage to Noncitizen Populations in Connecticut. Evaluating the U.S. Military's Progress Toward an Integrated Primary Prevention Workforce: Five-Year Process Evaluation Plan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1