Enhancing Strategic Learning Through the Implementation of Robust Process Improvement in a Specialized Tertiary Care Hospital.

Alliazer Abdulhamid, Ghiwa El Najjar, Aljohara Alayesh, Arwa Alghanmi
{"title":"Enhancing Strategic Learning Through the Implementation of Robust Process Improvement in a Specialized Tertiary Care Hospital.","authors":"Alliazer Abdulhamid,&nbsp;Ghiwa El Najjar,&nbsp;Aljohara Alayesh,&nbsp;Arwa Alghanmi","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-22-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Performance improvement (PI) in healthcare is essential to improve health, patient experience, and reduce costs. PI projects became low, inconsistent and weakly-sustained in our hospital. The low number and low sustainability were scarcely in alignment with our strategic goal to become a high reliability organization (HRO). This was due to lack of standardized knowledge and ability to initiate and sustain PI projects. Therefore, a structured framework was developed, followed by the building of capacity and capability in the use of robust process improvement (RPI) amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A team of healthcare quality professionals collaborated with Hospital Performance Improvement-Press Ganey for hospital-wide quality improvement project. The team received training on RPI from Press Ganey and created the framework to use . This framework is based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement, Lean, Six Sigma, and FOCUS-PDSA (Find-Organize-Clarify-Understand-Select-Plan-Do-Study-Act). Thereafter, the team of internal coaches organized an RPI training course that consisted of 6 sessions, for clinical and nonclinical staff , using classroom and virtual sessions during the pandemic. This course was increased to eight sessions to avoid information overload. Process measures were collected using a survey to obtain feedback, whereas outcome measures were from the number of completed projects and their effects related to costs, access to care, waiting time, number of harms, and compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participation and submission improved after three PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles. This resulted in an increased number of completed and sustained projects from 50 in 2019 to 94 in 2020 and continued to rise to 109 in 2021. There were 140 and 122 certified RPI coaches in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Although there was a decrease in the number of certified coaches in 2021, the number of completed projects was higher than in 2020. The overall effect of these completed projects by the third quarter of 2021 showed improvement in access to care by 39%, compliance to standards of care by 48%, satisfaction by 8%, and reduction in costs by 47,010 SAR, in waiting time of 170 hours, and in the number of harms by 89.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This quality improvement project led to enhanced capacity of staff as seen in the increased number of certified RPI coaches, thereby increasing the submission and completion of projects in 1 year. Its sustainability during the 2 succeeding years continued to enhance project completion and maintenance, bringing quality improvement benefits to the organization and the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"6 2","pages":"42-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6c/fe/i2589-9449-6-2-42.PMC10275630.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-22-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Performance improvement (PI) in healthcare is essential to improve health, patient experience, and reduce costs. PI projects became low, inconsistent and weakly-sustained in our hospital. The low number and low sustainability were scarcely in alignment with our strategic goal to become a high reliability organization (HRO). This was due to lack of standardized knowledge and ability to initiate and sustain PI projects. Therefore, a structured framework was developed, followed by the building of capacity and capability in the use of robust process improvement (RPI) amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A team of healthcare quality professionals collaborated with Hospital Performance Improvement-Press Ganey for hospital-wide quality improvement project. The team received training on RPI from Press Ganey and created the framework to use . This framework is based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement, Lean, Six Sigma, and FOCUS-PDSA (Find-Organize-Clarify-Understand-Select-Plan-Do-Study-Act). Thereafter, the team of internal coaches organized an RPI training course that consisted of 6 sessions, for clinical and nonclinical staff , using classroom and virtual sessions during the pandemic. This course was increased to eight sessions to avoid information overload. Process measures were collected using a survey to obtain feedback, whereas outcome measures were from the number of completed projects and their effects related to costs, access to care, waiting time, number of harms, and compliance.

Results: Participation and submission improved after three PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles. This resulted in an increased number of completed and sustained projects from 50 in 2019 to 94 in 2020 and continued to rise to 109 in 2021. There were 140 and 122 certified RPI coaches in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Although there was a decrease in the number of certified coaches in 2021, the number of completed projects was higher than in 2020. The overall effect of these completed projects by the third quarter of 2021 showed improvement in access to care by 39%, compliance to standards of care by 48%, satisfaction by 8%, and reduction in costs by 47,010 SAR, in waiting time of 170 hours, and in the number of harms by 89.

Conclusion: This quality improvement project led to enhanced capacity of staff as seen in the increased number of certified RPI coaches, thereby increasing the submission and completion of projects in 1 year. Its sustainability during the 2 succeeding years continued to enhance project completion and maintenance, bringing quality improvement benefits to the organization and the patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过在专科三级医院实施稳健流程改进来加强战略学习。
简介:医疗保健中的绩效改进(PI)对于改善健康、患者体验和降低成本至关重要。我院PI项目低、不一致、持续性弱。低数量和低可持续性几乎不符合我们成为高可靠性组织(HRO)的战略目标。这是由于缺乏标准化的知识和能力来启动和维持PI项目。因此,制定了一个结构化框架,随后进行了在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间使用稳健流程改进(RPI)的能力建设。方法:一组卫生保健质量专业人员与医院绩效改进出版社合作开展全院范围的质量改进项目。该团队接受了Press Ganey的RPI培训,并创建了要使用的框架。该框架基于医疗保健改进研究所改进模型、精益、六西格玛和FOCUS-PDSA(发现-组织-澄清-理解-选择-计划-执行-研究-行动)。此后,内部教练团队在大流行期间利用课堂和虚拟课程,为临床和非临床工作人员组织了一个由6节课组成的RPI培训课程。这个课程增加到8节课,以避免信息超载。过程度量是通过一项调查来收集反馈,而结果度量则来自完成项目的数量及其与成本、获得护理、等待时间、危害数量和依从性相关的影响。结果:经过三个PDSA(计划-做-研究-行动)周期后,参与和提交情况有所改善。这使得已完成和持续的项目数量从2019年的50个增加到2020年的94个,并在2021年继续增加到109个。2020年和2021年分别有140名和122名获得RPI认证的教练。虽然2021年获得认证的教练数量有所减少,但完成的项目数量高于2020年。到2021年第三季度完成的这些项目的总体效果表明,获得护理的机会改善了39%,遵守护理标准的程度提高了48%,满意度提高了8%,等待时间减少了170小时,费用减少了47,010里亚尔,伤害人数减少了89人。结论:这个质量改进项目提高了工作人员的能力,增加了经过认证的RPI教练的数量,从而增加了1年内提交和完成项目的数量。在接下来的两年里,它的可持续性继续提高了项目的完成和维护,为组织和患者带来了质量改善的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Group Antenatal Care Start-Up in the Indian Private Sector: An Implementation Journey to Improve Quality of Care. Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions. Summary of the 5th International Pharmacoeconomics Forum. Community Health Needs Assessment of Primary Healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1