Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia may underestimate task-specific fear of movement in people with and without low back pain.

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pain Reports Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001081
Liam-Pierre Mathieu Tissot, David William Evans, Edward Kirby, Bernard Xian Wei Liew
{"title":"Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia may underestimate task-specific fear of movement in people with and without low back pain.","authors":"Liam-Pierre Mathieu Tissot,&nbsp;David William Evans,&nbsp;Edward Kirby,&nbsp;Bernard Xian Wei Liew","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) is commonly used to assess fear of movement (FoM) in people with low back pain (LBP). However, the TSK does not provide a task-specific measure of FoM, whereas image-based or video-based methods may do so.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the magnitude of FoM when assessed using 3 methods (TSK-11, image of lifting, video of lifting) in 3 groups of people: current LBP (LBP), recovered LBP (rLBP), and asymptomatic controls (control).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one participants completed the TSK-11 and rated their FoM when viewing images and videos depicting people lifting objects. Low back pain and rLBP participants also completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Linear mixed models were used to estimate the effects of methods (TSK-11, image, video) and group (control, LBP, rLBP). Linear regression models were used to assess associations between the methods on ODI after adjusting for group. Finally, a linear mixed model was used to understand the effects of method (image, video) and load (light, heavy) on fear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all groups, viewing images (<i>P</i> = 0.009) and videos (<i>P</i> = 0.038) elicited greater FoM than that captured by the TSK-11. Only the TSK-11 was significantly associated with the ODI (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Finally, there was a significant main effect of load on fear (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fear of specific movements (eg, lifting) may be better measured using task-specific measures, such as images and videos, than by task-generic questionnaires, such as the TSK-11. Being more strongly associated with the ODI, the TSK-11 still plays an important role in understanding the impact of FoM on disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 4","pages":"e1081"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) is commonly used to assess fear of movement (FoM) in people with low back pain (LBP). However, the TSK does not provide a task-specific measure of FoM, whereas image-based or video-based methods may do so.

Objectives: To compare the magnitude of FoM when assessed using 3 methods (TSK-11, image of lifting, video of lifting) in 3 groups of people: current LBP (LBP), recovered LBP (rLBP), and asymptomatic controls (control).

Methods: Fifty-one participants completed the TSK-11 and rated their FoM when viewing images and videos depicting people lifting objects. Low back pain and rLBP participants also completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Linear mixed models were used to estimate the effects of methods (TSK-11, image, video) and group (control, LBP, rLBP). Linear regression models were used to assess associations between the methods on ODI after adjusting for group. Finally, a linear mixed model was used to understand the effects of method (image, video) and load (light, heavy) on fear.

Results: In all groups, viewing images (P = 0.009) and videos (P = 0.038) elicited greater FoM than that captured by the TSK-11. Only the TSK-11 was significantly associated with the ODI (P < 0.001). Finally, there was a significant main effect of load on fear (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Fear of specific movements (eg, lifting) may be better measured using task-specific measures, such as images and videos, than by task-generic questionnaires, such as the TSK-11. Being more strongly associated with the ODI, the TSK-11 still plays an important role in understanding the impact of FoM on disability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坦帕运动恐惧症量表可能低估了有或没有腰痛的人对运动的特定恐惧。
坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK)通常用于评估腰痛(LBP)患者的运动恐惧(FoM)。然而,TSK不提供特定于任务的FoM度量,而基于图像或基于视频的方法可以这样做。目的:比较3组患者(当前LBP (LBP)、恢复LBP (rLBP)和无症状对照组(control))使用3种方法(TSK-11、举重图像、举重视频)评估FoM的程度。方法:51名参与者完成了TSK-11,并对他们在观看描绘人们举起物体的图像和视频时的FoM进行了评分。腰痛和rLBP参与者还完成了Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)。采用线性混合模型估计方法(TSK-11、图像、视频)和组(对照组、LBP、rLBP)的效果。采用线性回归模型评估各组调整后各方法对ODI的相关性。最后,采用线性混合模型来了解方法(图像、视频)和负荷(轻、重)对恐惧的影响。结果:在所有组中,观看图像(P = 0.009)和视频(P = 0.038)比TSK-11捕获的FoM更大。只有TSK-11与ODI显著相关(P < 0.001)。最后,负荷对恐惧有显著的主效应(P < 0.001)。结论:使用特定任务的测量方法(如图像和视频)可能比使用任务通用问卷(如TSK-11)更好地测量特定动作(如举起)的恐惧。由于TSK-11与ODI的相关性更强,因此在理解FoM对残疾的影响方面仍发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bone metabolism in complex regional pain syndrome. Differences in multidimensional phenotype of 2 joint pain models link early weight-bearing deficit to late depressive-like behavior in male mice. Dry needling for orofacial pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Incidence and treatment of complex regional pain syndrome after surgery: analysis of claims data from Germany. Pregabalin produces analgesia in males but not females in an animal model of chronic widespread muscle pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1