Identifying individuals at risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma: challenges, existing tools and future steps.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Current Opinion in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000938
Andrew T Kunzmann, Joel H Rubenstein
{"title":"Identifying individuals at risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma: challenges, existing tools and future steps.","authors":"Andrew T Kunzmann,&nbsp;Joel H Rubenstein","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000000938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to discuss some of the clinical and epidemiological challenges of risk prediction models; summarize the evidence supporting existing models; and highlight the translational requirements.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A variety of risk prediction models exist to identify prevalent Barrett's esophagus or predict future esophageal adenocarcinoma. External validation studies have investigated performance of these models in a variety of settings. These models appear to be more predictive than use of symptoms alone, but the added complexity means that implementation challenges may require investigation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Risk prediction models could be useful for identifying individuals at an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, which could assist screening decisions. However, risk prediction models must be implemented with care. Implementation science to assist the translation of existing models into practice may be an important next step.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":"39 4","pages":"320-325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aims to discuss some of the clinical and epidemiological challenges of risk prediction models; summarize the evidence supporting existing models; and highlight the translational requirements.

Recent findings: A variety of risk prediction models exist to identify prevalent Barrett's esophagus or predict future esophageal adenocarcinoma. External validation studies have investigated performance of these models in a variety of settings. These models appear to be more predictive than use of symptoms alone, but the added complexity means that implementation challenges may require investigation.

Summary: Risk prediction models could be useful for identifying individuals at an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, which could assist screening decisions. However, risk prediction models must be implemented with care. Implementation science to assist the translation of existing models into practice may be an important next step.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别有食道腺癌风险的个体:挑战、现有工具和未来步骤。
综述目的:本综述旨在讨论风险预测模型的一些临床和流行病学挑战;总结支持现有模型的证据;并强调翻译要求。最近的发现:存在各种风险预测模型来识别流行的巴雷特食管或预测未来的食管腺癌。外部验证研究已经调查了这些模型在各种环境中的性能。这些模型似乎比单独使用症状更具预测性,但增加的复杂性意味着实施挑战可能需要调查。总结:风险预测模型可用于识别食管腺癌风险增加的个体,这有助于筛查决策。然而,风险预测模型必须谨慎实施。协助将现有模式转化为实践的实施科学可能是重要的下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
New therapies in celiac disease. Assessing patient-reported outcomes in primary sclerosing cholangitis: an update. Current approach to diagnosis and management of low-phospholipid associated cholelithiasis syndrome. The impact of deep response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis - should it be the new clinical standard? Effect of low birth weight and preterm delivery on the development of childhood celiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1