Derivation and Validation of a Simplified Clinical Prediction Rule for Identifying Children at Increased Risk for Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injuries Following Minor Blunt Head Trauma
{"title":"Derivation and Validation of a Simplified Clinical Prediction Rule for Identifying Children at Increased Risk for Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injuries Following Minor Blunt Head Trauma","authors":"Callum Rowe MD , Kathryn Wiesendanger BS , Conner Polet MD , Nathan Kuppermann MD, MPH , Stephen Aronoff MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop a simplified clinical prediction tool for identifying children with clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBIs) after minor blunt head trauma by applying machine learning to the previously reported Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>The deidentified dataset consisted of 43 399 patients <18 years old who presented with blunt head trauma to 1 of 25 pediatric emergency departments between June 2004 and September 2006. We divided the dataset into derivation (training) and validation (testing) subsets; 4 machine learning algorithms were optimized using the training set. Fitted models used the test set to predict ciTBI and these predictions were compared statistically with the a priori (no information) rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>None of the 4 machine learning models was superior to the no information rate. Children without clinical evidence of a skull fracture and with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15 were at the lowest risk for ciTBIs (0.48%; 95% CI 0.42%-0.55%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Machine learning algorithms were unable to produce a more accurate prediction tool for ciTBI among children with minor blunt head trauma beyond the absence of clinical evidence of skull fractures and having Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36706,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics: X","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100026","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590042020300070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective
To develop a simplified clinical prediction tool for identifying children with clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBIs) after minor blunt head trauma by applying machine learning to the previously reported Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network dataset.
Study design
The deidentified dataset consisted of 43 399 patients <18 years old who presented with blunt head trauma to 1 of 25 pediatric emergency departments between June 2004 and September 2006. We divided the dataset into derivation (training) and validation (testing) subsets; 4 machine learning algorithms were optimized using the training set. Fitted models used the test set to predict ciTBI and these predictions were compared statistically with the a priori (no information) rate.
Results
None of the 4 machine learning models was superior to the no information rate. Children without clinical evidence of a skull fracture and with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15 were at the lowest risk for ciTBIs (0.48%; 95% CI 0.42%-0.55%).
Conclusions
Machine learning algorithms were unable to produce a more accurate prediction tool for ciTBI among children with minor blunt head trauma beyond the absence of clinical evidence of skull fractures and having Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15.
目的通过将机器学习应用于先前报道的儿科急诊应用研究网络数据集,开发一种简化的临床预测工具,用于识别轻度钝性头部外伤后临床重要创伤性脑损伤(ciTBIs)的儿童。研究设计未确定的数据集包括2004年6月至2006年9月期间在25个儿科急诊科中的1个就诊的43 399名18岁的钝性头部创伤患者。我们将数据集分为派生(训练)和验证(测试)子集;利用训练集对4种机器学习算法进行了优化。拟合模型使用测试集来预测ciTBI,并将这些预测与先验(无信息)率进行统计比较。结果4种机器学习模型均优于无信息率。无颅骨骨折临床证据且格拉斯哥昏迷评分为15分的儿童发生ciTBIs的风险最低(0.48%;95% ci 0.42%-0.55%)。结论在没有颅骨骨折的临床证据和格拉斯哥昏迷评分为15分的情况下,机器学习算法无法为轻度钝性头部外伤儿童提供更准确的颅脑损伤预测工具。