A simple, bed-side tool to assess evoked pressure pain intensity.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2022-0055
Søren Nicolai Frederiksen Hostrup, Søren Francis Dyhrberg O'Neill, Jesper Bie Larsen, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Kristian Kjær Petersen
{"title":"A simple, bed-side tool to assess evoked pressure pain intensity.","authors":"Søren Nicolai Frederiksen Hostrup,&nbsp;Søren Francis Dyhrberg O'Neill,&nbsp;Jesper Bie Larsen,&nbsp;Lars Arendt-Nielsen,&nbsp;Kristian Kjær Petersen","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2022-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Existing equipment for quantitative sensory testing is generally expensive and not easily applicable in a clinical setting thus simple bed-side devices are warranted. Pressure hyperalgesia is a common finding in patients with musculoskeletal pain and an experimental model is delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS). DOMS is characterised by muscle hyperalgesia and some studies report facilitation of temporal summation of pain. This study aimed to detect DOMS induced muscle hyperalgesia and temporal summation of pain using a newly developed bed-side quantitative sensory testing device to deliver standardised pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two healthy participants participated in two sessions with the second session approximately 48 h after baseline. Pressure pain intensities were assessed from the gastrocnemius muscle with four probes calibrated to apply 2, 4, 6 and 8 kg, respectively. Temporal summation of pain (10 stimuli delivered at 0.5 Hz using the 6 kg probe) intensities were assessed from the same location. DOMS was evoked in the gastrocnemius muscle by an eccentric exercise. Sleepiness and physical activity were measured with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire to investigate if they were associated with the quantitative sensory testing measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pressure pain intensity was significantly increased 48 h after induction of DOMS when compared to baseline for all four probes (p<0.05). Temporal summation of pain was not statistically significant affected by DOMS and sleep quality and physical activity did not associate with any of the measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study introduces a simple, bed-side assessment tool for the assessment of pressure pain intensity and hence hyperalgesia and temporal summation of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2022-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Existing equipment for quantitative sensory testing is generally expensive and not easily applicable in a clinical setting thus simple bed-side devices are warranted. Pressure hyperalgesia is a common finding in patients with musculoskeletal pain and an experimental model is delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS). DOMS is characterised by muscle hyperalgesia and some studies report facilitation of temporal summation of pain. This study aimed to detect DOMS induced muscle hyperalgesia and temporal summation of pain using a newly developed bed-side quantitative sensory testing device to deliver standardised pressure.

Methods: Twenty-two healthy participants participated in two sessions with the second session approximately 48 h after baseline. Pressure pain intensities were assessed from the gastrocnemius muscle with four probes calibrated to apply 2, 4, 6 and 8 kg, respectively. Temporal summation of pain (10 stimuli delivered at 0.5 Hz using the 6 kg probe) intensities were assessed from the same location. DOMS was evoked in the gastrocnemius muscle by an eccentric exercise. Sleepiness and physical activity were measured with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire to investigate if they were associated with the quantitative sensory testing measures.

Results: Pressure pain intensity was significantly increased 48 h after induction of DOMS when compared to baseline for all four probes (p<0.05). Temporal summation of pain was not statistically significant affected by DOMS and sleep quality and physical activity did not associate with any of the measures.

Conclusions: This study introduces a simple, bed-side assessment tool for the assessment of pressure pain intensity and hence hyperalgesia and temporal summation of pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个简单的床边工具来评估诱发压力性疼痛强度。
目的:现有的定量感官检测设备通常价格昂贵,不容易应用于临床环境,因此需要简单的床边设备。压力痛觉过敏是肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的常见发现,实验模型是迟发性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)。迟发性迟发性疼痛的特征是肌肉痛觉过敏,一些研究报告了颞痛的促进。本研究旨在检测DOMS引起的肌肉痛觉过敏和疼痛的时间累积,使用新开发的床边定量感觉测试装置来提供标准化的压力。方法:22名健康参与者参加了两个疗程,第二次疗程在基线后约48小时。从腓肠肌用四个探针分别校准为2、4、6和8 kg,评估压力疼痛强度。从同一位置评估疼痛的时间总和(使用6kg探头以0.5 Hz传递10个刺激)强度。在腓肠肌的迟发性肌肉痉挛是由偏心运动引起的。用Epworth嗜睡量表和全球身体活动问卷来测量嗜睡和身体活动,以调查它们是否与定量感官测试措施有关。结果:与基线相比,所有四种探针在诱导迟发性肌肉酸痛48小时后压痛强度显著增加(结论:本研究引入了一种简单的床边评估工具,用于评估压痛强度,从而评估痛觉过敏和疼痛的时间累积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Neck and shoulder pain and inflammatory biomarkers in plasma among forklift truck operators - A case-control study. A positive scratch collapse test in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome indicates its neuropathic character. Real-world evidence evaluation on consumer experience and prescription journey of diclofenac gel in Sweden. Differences in risk factors for flare-ups in patients with lumbar radicular pain may depend on the definition of flare. The "future" pain clinician: Competencies needed to provide psychologically informed care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1