Konsta J Pamilo, Jaason Haapakoski, Tuulikki Sokka-Isler, Ville Remes, Juha Paloneva
{"title":"Decreased burden of revision hip replacements despite substantial rise in prevalence: a register-based analysis in Finland.","authors":"Konsta J Pamilo, Jaason Haapakoski, Tuulikki Sokka-Isler, Ville Remes, Juha Paloneva","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2022.4837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>While the incidence of THR operations has been established, little is known about the prevalence or the ratio of the annual number of revision THRs to the total number of THRs in the general population. By combining data from nationwide registers, we calculated the annual prevalence of THRs and the revision burden caused by THR survivors in Finland.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All primary THRs performed between 1980 and 2020 were identified from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). Patient deaths were extracted from the Finnish Digital and Population Data Services Agency and THR revisions and removals from the FAR and the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. We analyzed annual THR prevalence by dividing the number of THRs by the population aged 40 or older and the revision burden factor (RBF) by dividing the annual number of revisions by the total number of primary and revision THRs in the population. The proportions of bilateral implants and patients with THRs performed more than 10 years earlier (older THRs) were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>THR prevalence in Finland increased rapidly, reaching 3.6% in 2020. Between 2010 and 2020, the number of THRs increased by 50% and the prevalence of THRs by 38%. In 2020, the proportion of bilateral THRs had risen to 29% and the proportion of patients with older THRs to 36%. The RBF decreased between 1996 and 2020 from 3.1% to 1.3% (age- and sex-adjusted proportion ratio PR 0.42 [95% CI 0.39-0.45]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite the decrease in the RBF, the rapidly increasing prevalence of THRs potentially increases the number of revisits and revisions and thus poses a challenge for healthcare in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"93 ","pages":"801-807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/dd/ActaO-93-4837.PMC9555216.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.4837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background and purpose: While the incidence of THR operations has been established, little is known about the prevalence or the ratio of the annual number of revision THRs to the total number of THRs in the general population. By combining data from nationwide registers, we calculated the annual prevalence of THRs and the revision burden caused by THR survivors in Finland.
Patients and methods: All primary THRs performed between 1980 and 2020 were identified from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). Patient deaths were extracted from the Finnish Digital and Population Data Services Agency and THR revisions and removals from the FAR and the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. We analyzed annual THR prevalence by dividing the number of THRs by the population aged 40 or older and the revision burden factor (RBF) by dividing the annual number of revisions by the total number of primary and revision THRs in the population. The proportions of bilateral implants and patients with THRs performed more than 10 years earlier (older THRs) were identified.
Results: THR prevalence in Finland increased rapidly, reaching 3.6% in 2020. Between 2010 and 2020, the number of THRs increased by 50% and the prevalence of THRs by 38%. In 2020, the proportion of bilateral THRs had risen to 29% and the proportion of patients with older THRs to 36%. The RBF decreased between 1996 and 2020 from 3.1% to 1.3% (age- and sex-adjusted proportion ratio PR 0.42 [95% CI 0.39-0.45]).
Interpretation: Despite the decrease in the RBF, the rapidly increasing prevalence of THRs potentially increases the number of revisits and revisions and thus poses a challenge for healthcare in the future.
背景和目的:虽然THR手术的发生率已经确定,但对一般人群中THR手术的患病率或每年翻修THR手术的数量占THR手术总数的比例知之甚少。通过结合全国登记的数据,我们计算了芬兰每年THR的患病率和THR幸存者造成的修订负担。患者和方法:1980年至2020年间进行的所有原发性髋关节置换术均来自芬兰关节置换术登记(FAR)。患者死亡数据摘自芬兰数字和人口数据服务局和THR的修订,并从FAR和芬兰医院出院登记册中删除。我们分析了每年的THR患病率,方法是将THR的数量除以40岁及以上的人群,并将修订负担因子(RBF)除以每年的修订数量除以人群中原发性和修订性THR的总数。确定了双侧植入物的比例和10年以上(较老的thr)进行thr的患者比例。结果:芬兰THR患病率快速上升,2020年达到3.6%。2010年至2020年期间,艾滋病毒感染的数量增加了50%,艾滋病毒感染的患病率增加了38%。到2020年,双侧THRs比例上升到29%,老年THRs比例上升到36%。RBF在1996年至2020年间从3.1%下降到1.3%(年龄和性别调整比例比PR为0.42 [95% CI 0.39-0.45])。解释:尽管RBF下降,但快速增加的thr患病率可能会增加复诊和修订的次数,从而对未来的医疗保健构成挑战。
期刊介绍:
Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.