Identifying accurate pro-choice and pro-life identity labels in Spanish: Social media insights and implications for comparative survey research.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1363/psrh.12208
Danny Valdez, Kristen N Jozkowski, María S Montenegro, Brandon L Crawford, Frederica Jackson
{"title":"Identifying accurate pro-choice and pro-life identity labels in Spanish: Social media insights and implications for comparative survey research.","authors":"Danny Valdez,&nbsp;Kristen N Jozkowski,&nbsp;María S Montenegro,&nbsp;Brandon L Crawford,&nbsp;Frederica Jackson","doi":"10.1363/psrh.12208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although debate remains about the saliency and relevance of pro-choice and pro-life labels (as abortion belief indicators), they have been consistently used for decades to broadly designate abortion identity. However, clear labels are less apparent in other languages (e.g., Spanish). Social media, as an exploratory data science tool, can be leveraged to identify the presence and popularity of online abortion identity labels and how they are contextualized online.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to determine how popularly used Spanish-language pro-choice and pro-life identity labels are contextualized online.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic models, an unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) application, to generate themes about Spanish language tweets categorized by Spanish abortion identity labels: (1) proelección (pro-choice); (2) derecho a decidir (right to choose); (3) proaborto (pro-abortion); (4) provida (pro-life); (5) antiaborto (anti-abortion); and (6) derecho a vivir (right to life). We manually reviewed themes for each identity label to assess scope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All six identity labels included in our analysis contained some references to abortion. However, several labels were not exclusive to abortion. Proelección (pro-choice), for example, contained several themes related to ongoing presidential elections.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>No singular Spanish abortion identity label encapsulates abortion beliefs; however, there are several viable options. Just as the debate remains ongoing about pro-choice and pro-life as accurate indicators of abortion beliefs in English, we must also consider that identity is more complex than binary labels in Spanish.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":"54 4","pages":"166-176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/18/PSRH-54-166.PMC10092859.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: Although debate remains about the saliency and relevance of pro-choice and pro-life labels (as abortion belief indicators), they have been consistently used for decades to broadly designate abortion identity. However, clear labels are less apparent in other languages (e.g., Spanish). Social media, as an exploratory data science tool, can be leveraged to identify the presence and popularity of online abortion identity labels and how they are contextualized online.

Purpose: This study aims to determine how popularly used Spanish-language pro-choice and pro-life identity labels are contextualized online.

Method: We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic models, an unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) application, to generate themes about Spanish language tweets categorized by Spanish abortion identity labels: (1) proelección (pro-choice); (2) derecho a decidir (right to choose); (3) proaborto (pro-abortion); (4) provida (pro-life); (5) antiaborto (anti-abortion); and (6) derecho a vivir (right to life). We manually reviewed themes for each identity label to assess scope.

Results: All six identity labels included in our analysis contained some references to abortion. However, several labels were not exclusive to abortion. Proelección (pro-choice), for example, contained several themes related to ongoing presidential elections.

Discussion and conclusion: No singular Spanish abortion identity label encapsulates abortion beliefs; however, there are several viable options. Just as the debate remains ongoing about pro-choice and pro-life as accurate indicators of abortion beliefs in English, we must also consider that identity is more complex than binary labels in Spanish.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别准确的西班牙语支持选择和支持生命的身份标签:社会媒体的见解和对比较调查研究的影响。
导言:尽管关于支持选择和支持生命标签(作为堕胎信仰指标)的显著性和相关性的争论仍然存在,但几十年来,它们一直被广泛地用于广泛地指定堕胎身份。然而,在其他语言(如西班牙语)中,清晰的标签就不那么明显了。社交媒体作为一种探索性的数据科学工具,可以用来识别在线堕胎身份标签的存在和受欢迎程度,以及它们是如何在网上被语境化的。目的:本研究旨在确定流行的西班牙语支持选择和支持生命的身份标签是如何在网上语境化的。方法:我们使用潜狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet Allocation, LDA)主题模型(一种无监督自然语言处理(NLP)应用程序)来生成关于西班牙语推文的主题,这些推文被西班牙堕胎身份标签分类:(1)proelección (pro-choice);(二)取消选择权;(三)赞成堕胎;(四)提供(反堕胎);(5)反堕胎(anti- aborto);(6) derecho a vivir(生命权)。我们手动审查每个身份标签的主题以评估范围。结果:我们分析的6个身份标签都包含一些堕胎的内容。然而,有几个标签并不是堕胎所独有的。例如,Proelección(支持选择)载有与正在进行的总统选举有关的若干主题。讨论与结论:没有单一的西班牙堕胎身份标签可以概括堕胎信仰;然而,有几个可行的选择。就像英语中支持选择和反对堕胎是否能准确反映堕胎信仰的争论仍在继续一样,我们也必须考虑到,身份认同比西班牙语中的二元标签要复杂得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.
期刊最新文献
Sexual choking/strangulation and its association with condom and contraceptive use: Findings from a survey of students at a university in the Midwestern United States. Understanding abortion legality and trimester of abortion care in Ohio, West Virginia and Kentucky, three abortion‐restrictive states Abortion assistance fund staff and volunteers as patient navigators following an abortion ban in Texas. Abortion-related crowdfunding post-Dobbs. Medicaid's role in alleviating some of the financial burden of abortion: Findings from the 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1