Is Fluoroquinolone Exposure after Primary Tendon Repair Associated with Higher Rates of Reoperations? A Matched Cohort Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2023-02-21 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.67914
Timothy L Waters, Bailey J Ross, J Heath Wilder, Matthew W Cole, Lacee K Collins, William F Sherman
{"title":"Is Fluoroquinolone Exposure after Primary Tendon Repair Associated with Higher Rates of Reoperations? A Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Timothy L Waters, Bailey J Ross, J Heath Wilder, Matthew W Cole, Lacee K Collins, William F Sherman","doi":"10.52965/001c.67914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between tendon damage and fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics has been well documented. However, there is limited data evaluating the impact of postoperative FQ use on outcomes of primary tendon repairs. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of reoperation for patients with FQ exposure after primary tendon repair versus controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. All patients who underwent primary repair of distal biceps ruptures, Achilles tendon ruptures, and rotator cuff tears were identified. For each tendon, patients who were prescribed FQs within 90 days postoperatively were propensity score matched at a 1:3 ratio with controls without postoperative FQ prescriptions across age, sex, and several comorbidities. Rates of reoperation were compared at two years postoperatively with multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 124,322 patients who underwent primary tendon procedures were identified, including 3,982 (3.2%) patients with FQ prescriptions within 90 days postoperatively: 448 with distal biceps repair, 2,538 with rotator cuff repair, and 996 with Achilles tendon repair. These cohorts were matched with 1,344, 7,614, and 2,988 controls, respectively. Patients with postoperative FQ prescriptions exhibited significantly higher rates of revision surgery after primary repair of distal biceps ruptures (3.6% vs. 1.7%; OR 2.13; 95% CI, 1.09-4.04), rotator cuff tears (7.1% vs. 4.1%; OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.48-2.15), and Achilles tendon ruptures (3.8% vs. 1.8%; OR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.40-3.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with FQ prescriptions within 90 days after primary tendon repair demonstrated significantly higher rates of reoperations for distal biceps, rotator cuff, and Achilles tendon repair at two years postoperatively. To achieve optimal outcomes and avoid complications in patients following primary tendon repair procedures, physicians should consider prescribing alternative non-FQ antibiotics and counsel patients on the risk of reoperation associated with postoperative FQ use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"15 ","pages":"67914"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9946796/pdf/orthopedicreviews_2023_15_67914.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.67914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between tendon damage and fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics has been well documented. However, there is limited data evaluating the impact of postoperative FQ use on outcomes of primary tendon repairs. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of reoperation for patients with FQ exposure after primary tendon repair versus controls.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. All patients who underwent primary repair of distal biceps ruptures, Achilles tendon ruptures, and rotator cuff tears were identified. For each tendon, patients who were prescribed FQs within 90 days postoperatively were propensity score matched at a 1:3 ratio with controls without postoperative FQ prescriptions across age, sex, and several comorbidities. Rates of reoperation were compared at two years postoperatively with multivariable logistic regression.

Results: A total of 124,322 patients who underwent primary tendon procedures were identified, including 3,982 (3.2%) patients with FQ prescriptions within 90 days postoperatively: 448 with distal biceps repair, 2,538 with rotator cuff repair, and 996 with Achilles tendon repair. These cohorts were matched with 1,344, 7,614, and 2,988 controls, respectively. Patients with postoperative FQ prescriptions exhibited significantly higher rates of revision surgery after primary repair of distal biceps ruptures (3.6% vs. 1.7%; OR 2.13; 95% CI, 1.09-4.04), rotator cuff tears (7.1% vs. 4.1%; OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.48-2.15), and Achilles tendon ruptures (3.8% vs. 1.8%; OR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.40-3.27).

Conclusion: Patients with FQ prescriptions within 90 days after primary tendon repair demonstrated significantly higher rates of reoperations for distal biceps, rotator cuff, and Achilles tendon repair at two years postoperatively. To achieve optimal outcomes and avoid complications in patients following primary tendon repair procedures, physicians should consider prescribing alternative non-FQ antibiotics and counsel patients on the risk of reoperation associated with postoperative FQ use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性肌腱修复术后氟喹诺酮类药物暴露与较高的再手术率有关吗?一项匹配队列研究。
背景:肌腱损伤与氟喹诺酮类(FQ)抗生素之间的关系已被充分证明。然而,评估术后使用氟喹诺酮对初级肌腱修复术结果的影响的数据却很有限。本研究旨在比较初次肌腱修复术后接触过 FQ 的患者与对照组的再次手术率:方法:使用 PearlDiver 数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。确定了所有接受肱二头肌远端断裂、跟腱断裂和肩袖撕裂初次修复的患者。针对每种肌腱,将术后 90 天内开具 FQs 处方的患者与未开具术后 FQ 处方的对照组按年龄、性别和几种合并症以 1:3 的比例进行倾向评分匹配。通过多变量逻辑回归比较了术后两年的再手术率:共有 124,322 名患者接受了初级肌腱手术,其中 3,982 人(3.2%)在术后 90 天内服用了 FQ:其中 448 人接受了远端二头肌修复术,2538 人接受了肩袖修复术,996 人接受了跟腱修复术。这些组群分别与 1,344 例、7,614 例和 2,988 例对照组进行了配对。术后服用FQ处方的患者在肱二头肌远端断裂(3.6% vs. 1.7%;OR 2.13;95% CI,1.09-4.04)、肩袖撕裂(7.1% vs. 4.1%;OR 1.77;95% CI,1.48-2.15)和跟腱断裂(3.8% vs. 1.8%;OR 2.15;95% CI,1.40-3.27)的初次修复后进行翻修手术的比例明显更高:结论:初次肌腱修复术后90天内使用FQ处方的患者,术后两年内再次进行肱二头肌远端、肩袖和跟腱修复手术的比例明显更高。为了达到最佳治疗效果并避免患者在接受初级肌腱修复术后出现并发症,医生应考虑开具非 FQ 抗生素的替代处方,并向患者说明术后使用 FQ 会导致再次手术的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Haemodynamics, side effects and safety of the combination of continuous femoral nerve block and intravenous parecoxib for pain management after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A pilot study. Practice Patterns of Physicians who Perform Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections. Lateral ligament reconstruction and additive medial ligament reconstruction in chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study. Anesthetic Management of a Patient with Renal Cell Carcinoma-Associated Venous Thrombosis and Massive Transfusion. Comparative assessment of bone cement implantation syndrome in cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty: impact in patients with and without preexisting heart disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1