Mainstreamed genetic testing of breast cancer patients: experience from a single surgeon's practice in a large US Academic Center.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Familial Cancer Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-24 DOI:10.1007/s10689-023-00342-3
Teresa S Chai, Kanhua Yin, Mackenzie Wooters, Kristen M Shannon, Kevin S Hughes
{"title":"Mainstreamed genetic testing of breast cancer patients: experience from a single surgeon's practice in a large US Academic Center.","authors":"Teresa S Chai,&nbsp;Kanhua Yin,&nbsp;Mackenzie Wooters,&nbsp;Kristen M Shannon,&nbsp;Kevin S Hughes","doi":"10.1007/s10689-023-00342-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the impact of mainstreamed genetic testing (MGT) on the timing and uptake of testing in an academic breast surgeon's practice. Before September 2019 (pre-MGT phase), a breast surgery practice at Massachusetts General Hospital followed a traditional model of a pre-test consultation with a genetic counselor (GC) following a referral. After September 2019 (post-MGT phase), the same practice offered patients genetic testing in a single clinical encounter with a breast surgeon. We evaluated the waiting time between referral and GC visit in the pre-MGT phase and compared the uptake and positivity rates between both phases. In the pre-MGT phase (204 patients), the median waiting time for GC visit was seven days for patients with a newly diagnosed cancer, 211 days for patients with a personal history of cancer, and 224 days for non-cancer patients who had a family history. A total of 105 (51.5%) patients completed a GC appointment. In the post-MGT phase (202 patients), a significantly higher proportion of patients (88.1%, p < 0.001) consented to genetic testing, while the proportion of patients who tested positive was lower (pathogenic variant: 11.9% vs. 20.0%; variant of uncertain significance: 19.9% vs. 28.0%; p = 0.047). Implementing MGT can reduce the number of clinical visits, significantly shorten patients' wait time to test initiation, and increase the completion of genetic testing. Successful integration of this model relied on the genetic expertise of the breast surgeon involved and the support of the GC team.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"467-474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-023-00342-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of mainstreamed genetic testing (MGT) on the timing and uptake of testing in an academic breast surgeon's practice. Before September 2019 (pre-MGT phase), a breast surgery practice at Massachusetts General Hospital followed a traditional model of a pre-test consultation with a genetic counselor (GC) following a referral. After September 2019 (post-MGT phase), the same practice offered patients genetic testing in a single clinical encounter with a breast surgeon. We evaluated the waiting time between referral and GC visit in the pre-MGT phase and compared the uptake and positivity rates between both phases. In the pre-MGT phase (204 patients), the median waiting time for GC visit was seven days for patients with a newly diagnosed cancer, 211 days for patients with a personal history of cancer, and 224 days for non-cancer patients who had a family history. A total of 105 (51.5%) patients completed a GC appointment. In the post-MGT phase (202 patients), a significantly higher proportion of patients (88.1%, p < 0.001) consented to genetic testing, while the proportion of patients who tested positive was lower (pathogenic variant: 11.9% vs. 20.0%; variant of uncertain significance: 19.9% vs. 28.0%; p = 0.047). Implementing MGT can reduce the number of clinical visits, significantly shorten patients' wait time to test initiation, and increase the completion of genetic testing. Successful integration of this model relied on the genetic expertise of the breast surgeon involved and the support of the GC team.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者的主流基因检测:美国大型学术中心一位外科医生的实践经验。
本研究评估了主流基因检测(MGT)对学术乳腺外科医生实践中检测时间和接受率的影响。在2019年9月之前(MGT前阶段),马萨诸塞州总医院的乳腺外科诊所遵循传统模式,在转诊后与遗传顾问(GC)进行测试前咨询。2019年9月(MGT后阶段)后,同样的做法为患者在与乳腺外科医生的一次临床会面中提供基因检测。我们评估了MGT前阶段转诊和GC就诊之间的等待时间,并比较了两个阶段的吸收率和阳性率。在MGT前阶段(204名患者),新诊断为癌症的患者GC就诊的中位等待时间为7天,有癌症个人病史的患者为211天,有家族史的非癌症患者为224天。共有105名(51.5%)患者完成了GC预约。在MGT后阶段(202名患者),患者比例显著较高(88.1%,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
期刊最新文献
Haplotype analysis detects MLH1 founder variant in Indian Lynch syndrome patient cohort. Bilateral familial retinoblastoma diagnosed via optical coherence tomography following a normal funduscopic exam. Recurrent paraneoplastic nephrotic syndrome; insights from a Lynch syndrome patient with multiple malignancies. Sarcomas arising in MEN1 patients: demonstrating LOH of the MEN1 locus and loss of menin expression. A family-based approach to cascade genetic testing in a pediatric cancer genetics clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1