How does nano-focus computed tomography impact the quantification of debris within the root canal system?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Brazilian Oral Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0059
Clarissa Teles Rodrigues, Reinhilde Jacobs, Mostafa Ezeldeen, Karla de Faria Vasconcelos, Paul Lambrechts, Mario Tanomaru Filho, Jader Camilo Pinto, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte
{"title":"How does nano-focus computed tomography impact the quantification of debris within the root canal system?","authors":"Clarissa Teles Rodrigues,&nbsp;Reinhilde Jacobs,&nbsp;Mostafa Ezeldeen,&nbsp;Karla de Faria Vasconcelos,&nbsp;Paul Lambrechts,&nbsp;Mario Tanomaru Filho,&nbsp;Jader Camilo Pinto,&nbsp;Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the quantification of hard-tissue debris by using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and nano-focus computed tomography (nano-CT) after root canal instrumentation. Ten mandibular molars containing an isthmus in the mesial root were scanned in a SkyScan 1172 micro-CT device with a voxel size of 12.8 µm and in a NanoTom nano-CT device with 5.5 µm. The mesial root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of saline solution at the orifice level, instrumented with Reciproc R25 files and a second scanning was performed by micro-CT and nano-CT devices for post-instrumentation images. DataViewer software was used for registering the pre- and post-operative micro-CT and nano-CT images. The root canal and the debris were segmented for quantitative analysis of the volume of the canal and volume of debris using CTAn software. Statistical analysis was performed using the T test for comparison between volume of the canal after instrumentation and volume of debris in both image modalities. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Nano-CT images showed higher values of debris when compared with micro-CT (p < 0.05) after root canal instrumentation. No difference was observed between the volume of the root canal after instrumentation in the two imaging methods used (p > 0.05). Nano-CT technology can be recommended as a more precise method for quantitative analysis of hard-tissue debris. Moreover, in Endodontic research it is a promising method, as it is capable of providing higher spatial and contrast resolution, faster scanning and higher image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48942,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the quantification of hard-tissue debris by using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and nano-focus computed tomography (nano-CT) after root canal instrumentation. Ten mandibular molars containing an isthmus in the mesial root were scanned in a SkyScan 1172 micro-CT device with a voxel size of 12.8 µm and in a NanoTom nano-CT device with 5.5 µm. The mesial root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of saline solution at the orifice level, instrumented with Reciproc R25 files and a second scanning was performed by micro-CT and nano-CT devices for post-instrumentation images. DataViewer software was used for registering the pre- and post-operative micro-CT and nano-CT images. The root canal and the debris were segmented for quantitative analysis of the volume of the canal and volume of debris using CTAn software. Statistical analysis was performed using the T test for comparison between volume of the canal after instrumentation and volume of debris in both image modalities. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Nano-CT images showed higher values of debris when compared with micro-CT (p < 0.05) after root canal instrumentation. No difference was observed between the volume of the root canal after instrumentation in the two imaging methods used (p > 0.05). Nano-CT technology can be recommended as a more precise method for quantitative analysis of hard-tissue debris. Moreover, in Endodontic research it is a promising method, as it is capable of providing higher spatial and contrast resolution, faster scanning and higher image quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳米聚焦计算机断层扫描如何影响根管系统内碎片的量化?
本研究的目的是比较根管预备后使用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)和纳米焦点计算机断层扫描(nano-CT)对硬组织碎片的定量。采用体素尺寸为12.8µm的SkyScan 1172微型ct设备和5.5µm的NanoTom纳米ct设备对10颗下颌磨牙进行扫描。在孔位用5ml生理盐水溶液冲洗近中根管,用Reciproc R25锉进行器械检查,并用micro-CT和nano-CT设备进行第二次扫描,以获得器械检查后的图像。应用DataViewer软件对术前、术后微ct和纳米ct图像进行配准。使用CTAn软件对根管和碎片进行分割,定量分析根管体积和碎片体积。使用T检验进行统计分析,比较两种图像模式下预备后的根管体积和碎片体积。p < 0.05为显著性水平。根管预备后,纳米ct图像显示碎片值高于微ct (p < 0.05)。两种成像方法根管内固定后根管体积比较差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。纳米ct技术可以作为一种更精确的硬组织碎片定量分析方法。此外,在牙髓研究中,它具有更高的空间分辨率和对比度分辨率,更快的扫描速度和更高的图像质量,是一种很有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Oral Research
Brazilian Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Virtual learning object about oral ulcerative lesions: controlled educational intervention study. Braz. Oral Res. 2023:37:e118. Comparative study of sex estimates in adult skulls using direct measurement and tomographic image reconstruction. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e064. Association among COVID-19, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and oral health status. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e072. Evaluation of peripheral nerve fibers and mast cells in burning mouth syndrome. Erratum: Evaluation of the expression of nerve fiber markers in healthy and inflamed dental pulp. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e020.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1